Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 613.400 (2026)
Preferential treatment of certain persons on account of imbalance in existing number or percentage of those persons employed not required
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 613.400 Preferential treatment of certain persons on account of
imbalance in existing number or percentage of those persons employed not
required. Nothing contained in NRS 613.310 to 613.435, inclusive, or 613.4383 requires any employer, employment
agency, labor organization or joint labor-management committee subject to NRS 613.310 to 613.435, inclusive, and 613.4383 to grant preferential treatment
to any person or to any group because of the race, color, religion, sex, sexual
orientation, gender identity or expression, age, disability or national origin
of the individual or group on account of an imbalance which exists with respect
to the total number or percentage of persons of any race, color, religion, sex,
sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, disability or national
origin employed by any employer, referred or classified for employment by any
employment agency or labor organization, admitted to membership or classified
by any labor organization, or admitted to, or employed in, any apprenticeship
or other training program, in comparison with the total number or percentage of
persons of that race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity
or expression, age, disability or national origin in any community, section or
other area, or in the available workforce in any community, section or other
area.
(Added to NRS by 1965, 694; A 1967, 110; 1973, 984; 1975, 1458; 1991, 1027; 1999, 1941; 2011, 499)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2021–2021 · leading case: Tulipat v. Lombardo (D. Nev. 2021).
Tulipat v. Lombardo (D. Nev. 2021). “The 13 14 Court dismisses Tulipat’s claims for violations of (1) NRS 613.400; (2) NRS 613.412; and (3) 613.”
Tulipat v. Lombardo (D. Nev. 2021). “The Court recommends 16 that Tulipat’s claims for (1) NRS 613.400; (2) NRS 613.412; and (3) 613.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.