NRS
62A.360 Legislative declaration. The
Legislature hereby declares that:
1. This title must be liberally construed
to the end that:
(a) Each child who is subject to the jurisdiction
of the juvenile court must receive such care, guidance and control, preferably
in the child’s own home, as will be conducive to the child’s welfare and the
best interests of this State; and
(b) When a child is removed from the control of
the parent or guardian of the child, the juvenile court shall secure for the
child a level of care which is equivalent as nearly as possible to the care
that should have been given to the child by the parent or guardian.
2. One of the purposes of this title is to
promote the establishment, supervision and implementation of preventive
programs that are designed to prevent a child from becoming subject to the
jurisdiction of the juvenile court.
(Added to NRS by 2003,
1026)
Notes of Decisions
State v. Steven Daniel P. (2013)
nev · cites it 2×
“NRS 62A.360(1) declares that the title should be construed liberally to ensure all juveniles receive appropriate care and guidance.”
State v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct. (Logan D.) (2013)
nev · cites it 2×
“See NRS 62A.360(1)(a); In re Seven Minors, <a href="/opinion/8085020/thomas-r-v-juvenile-division/#432" aria-description="Citation for case: Thomas R.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62A.360(1) — 1 case
State v. Steven Daniel P. (2013)
nev
“NRS 62A.360(1) declares that the title should be construed liberally to ensure all juveniles receive appropriate care and guidance.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62A.360(1)(a) — 1 case
State v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct. (Logan D.) (2013)
nev
“See NRS 62A.360(1)(a); In re Seven Minors, <a href="/opinion/8085020/thomas-r-v-juvenile-division/#432" aria-description="Citation for case: Thomas R.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62A.360(2) — 1 case
State v. Steven Daniel P. (2013)
nev
“NRS 62A.360(1) declares that the title should be construed liberally to ensure all juveniles receive appropriate care and guidance.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62A.360(l)(a) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.