NRS
62C.230 Court referral for informal supervision or court supervision
pursuant to supervision and consent decree; effect of successful completion of
supervision and consent decree.
1. If the district attorney files a
petition with the juvenile court, the juvenile court may:
(a) Dismiss the petition without prejudice and
refer the child to the probation officer for informal supervision pursuant to NRS 62C.200; or
(b) Place the child under the supervision of the
juvenile court pursuant to a supervision and consent decree, without a formal
adjudication of delinquency, if the juvenile court receives:
(1) The recommendation of the probation
officer;
(2) The written approval of the district attorney;
and
(3) The written consent and approval of
the child and the parent or guardian of the child.
2. If a child is placed under the
supervision of the juvenile court pursuant to a supervision and consent decree,
the juvenile court may dismiss the petition if the child successfully completes
the terms and conditions of the supervision and consent decree.
3. If the petition is dismissed pursuant
to subsection 2:
(a) The child may respond to any inquiry
concerning the proceedings and events which brought about the proceedings as if
they had not occurred; and
(b) The records concerning a supervision and
consent decree may be considered in a subsequent proceeding before the juvenile
court regarding that child.
(Added to NRS by 2003,
1052)
Notes of Decisions
State v. Steven Daniel P., 309 P.3d 1041 (Nev. 2013).
· cites it 25× “Thus, NRS 62C.230 addresses the availability of informal supervision.”
State of Iowa v. Iowa Dist. Court for Warren Cnty., 828 N.W.2d 607 (Iowa 2013).
· cites it 2× “Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62C.230(b) (2011). In Wyoming, the juvenile court may “place a delinquent child under the supervision of a probation officer,” and such “placement of the child is subject to the terms, conditions and stipulations agreed to by the parties affected.”
In re I.S., 140 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 18 (Nev. 2024).
· cites it 16× “200(1)(b)'s requirement of prosecutorial consent before a juvenile court may dismiss a petition and send a juvenile to informal supervision under NRS 62C.230 unconstitutionally violated the separation of powers between the executive and judicial branches of government.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62C.230(1) — 1 case
In re I.S., 140 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 18 (Nev. 2024).
“200(1)(b)'s requirement of prosecutorial consent before a juvenile court may dismiss a petition and send a juvenile to informal supervision under NRS 62C.230 unconstitutionally violated the separation of powers between the executive and judicial branches of government.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62C.230(1)(a) — 2 cases
State v. Steven Daniel P., 309 P.3d 1041 (Nev. 2013).
“Thus, NRS 62C.230 addresses the availability of informal supervision.”
In re I.S., 140 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 18 (Nev. 2024).
“200(1)(b)'s requirement of prosecutorial consent before a juvenile court may dismiss a petition and send a juvenile to informal supervision under NRS 62C.230 unconstitutionally violated the separation of powers between the executive and judicial branches of government.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62C.230(1)(b) — 1 case
State v. Steven Daniel P., 309 P.3d 1041 (Nev. 2013).
“Thus, NRS 62C.230 addresses the availability of informal supervision.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62C.230(b) — 1 case
State of Iowa v. Iowa Dist. Court for Warren Cnty., 828 N.W.2d 607 (Iowa 2013).
“Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62C.230(b) (2011). In Wyoming, the juvenile court may “place a delinquent child under the supervision of a probation officer,” and such “placement of the child is subject to the terms, conditions and stipulations agreed to by the parties affected.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.