Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 62D - PROCEDURE IN JUVENILE PROCEEDINGS

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62D.500

Appeals

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 62D.500  Appeals.

      1.  Appeals from the orders of the juvenile court may be taken to the appellate court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to the rules fixed by the Supreme Court pursuant to Section 4 of Article 6 of the Nevada Constitution in the same manner as appeals in civil cases are taken.

      2.  For the purposes of this section, a decision to deny certification of a child for criminal proceedings as an adult is a final judgment from which an appeal may be taken.

      (Added to NRS by 2003, 1060; A 2003, 1512; 2013, 1745)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2007–2019 · leading case: State v. Eric A. L.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Eric A. L. (2007) nev · cites it 10× “Juvenile speedy trial right Under NRS 62D.500, the State may appeal from a juvenile court order denying a petition to certify a child for criminal proceedings as an adult.”
A.J. VS. DIST. CT. (STATE) (2017) nev · cites it 2× “Under NRS 62D.500(1), juvenile court orders are expressly appealable in an appellate court of competent jurisdiction, and this court has specifically stated that a minor generally has "a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the form of an appeal from any judgment adjudicating…”
In Re: W.A.F. (2019) nev “Even assuming that this is a civil appeal and the rules applicable to civil appeals apply, see NRS 62D.500(1) (appeals from juvenile court orders may be taken "in the same manner as appeals in civil cases are taken), the challenged oral ruling is not appealable.”
A.J. VS. DIST. CT. (STATE) (2017) nev “Under NRS 62D.500(1), juvenile court orders are expressly appealable in an appellate court of competent jurisdiction, and this court has specifically stated that a minor generally has "a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the form of an appeal from any judgment adjudicating…”
Feazeal (Travis) Vs. State (2019) nev “See NRS 62D.500(2); see also Castillo v. State, 106 Nev.”
Natalie M. v. Dist. Ct. (State) (2015) nev “NRS 62D.500(1); NRAP 3A(b)(1); Consol. Generator-Nevada, Inc.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62D.500(1) — 4 cases
A.J. VS. DIST. CT. (STATE) (2017) nev “Under NRS 62D.500(1), juvenile court orders are expressly appealable in an appellate court of competent jurisdiction, and this court has specifically stated that a minor generally has "a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the form of an appeal from any judgment adjudicating…”
In Re: W.A.F. (2019) nev “Even assuming that this is a civil appeal and the rules applicable to civil appeals apply, see NRS 62D.500(1) (appeals from juvenile court orders may be taken "in the same manner as appeals in civil cases are taken), the challenged oral ruling is not appealable.”
A.J. VS. DIST. CT. (STATE) (2017) nev “Under NRS 62D.500(1), juvenile court orders are expressly appealable in an appellate court of competent jurisdiction, and this court has specifically stated that a minor generally has "a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the form of an appeal from any judgment adjudicating…”
Natalie M. v. Dist. Ct. (State) (2015) nev “NRS 62D.500(1); NRAP 3A(b)(1); Consol. Generator-Nevada, Inc.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62D.500(2) — 2 cases
State v. Eric A. L. (2007) nev “Juvenile speedy trial right Under NRS 62D.500, the State may appeal from a juvenile court order denying a petition to certify a child for criminal proceedings as an adult.”
Feazeal (Travis) Vs. State (2019) nev “See NRS 62D.500(2); see also Castillo v. State, 106 Nev.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.