Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 62H - RECORDS RELATED TO CHILDREN

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62H.300

Legislative findings and declarations

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 62H.300  Legislative findings and declarations.  The Legislature hereby finds and declares that:

      1.  A significant number of offenders in Nevada have been convicted of sexual offenses. Many of these offenders have been convicted of sexual offenses on more than one occasion, and many of these offenders began committing sexual offenses as juveniles.

      2.  There is a great need for a continuing statistical analysis regarding the recidivism of juvenile sex offenders so that the most appropriate punishment and treatment may be identified to prevent these juvenile sex offenders, as juveniles, from committing further acts that, if committed by adults, would be sexual offenses or, later as adults, from committing sexual offenses.

      (Added to NRS by 2009, 1841)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2013–2013 · leading case: State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clark
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clark (2013) nev “html; see also NRS 62H.300(2) (recognizing the need for greater statistical analysis regarding recidivism rates of juvenile sex offenders).”
State v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct. (Logan D.) (2013) nev “html; see also NRS 62H.300(2) (recognizing the need for greater statistical analysis regarding recidivism rates of juvenile sex offenders).”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62H.300(2) — 2 cases
State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clark (2013) nev “html; see also NRS 62H.300(2) (recognizing the need for greater statistical analysis regarding recidivism rates of juvenile sex offenders).”
State v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct. (Logan D.) (2013) nev “html; see also NRS 62H.300(2) (recognizing the need for greater statistical analysis regarding recidivism rates of juvenile sex offenders).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.