Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 63.030 (2026)

“Facility” defined

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 63.030  “Facility” defined.

      1.  “Facility” means a state facility for the detention or commitment of children which is administered by the State of Nevada.

      2.  The term includes, but is not limited to, the Nevada Youth Training Center and the Caliente Youth Center.

      (Added to NRS by 2003, 1095)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2017–2017 · leading case: A.J. Vs. Dist. Ct. (state), 2017 NV 28 (Nev. 2017).
A.J. Vs. Dist. Ct. (state), 2017 NV 28 (Nev. 2017). · cites it 2× “1981) (specifically mentioning the training center located in Caliente, Nevada, and determining that "[t]raining centers are meant to house delinquents and delinquents only," and holding "that nondelinquent children coming within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court may not be…”
A.J. Vs. Dist. Ct. (state), 2017 NV 28 (Nev. 2017). “1981) (specifically mentioning the training center located in Caliente, Nevada, and determining that "[t]raining centers are meant to house delinquents and delinquents only," and holding "that nondelinquent children coming within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court may not be…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 63.030(1) — 2 cases
A.J. Vs. Dist. Ct. (state), 2017 NV 28 (Nev. 2017). “1981) (specifically mentioning the training center located in Caliente, Nevada, and determining that "[t]raining centers are meant to house delinquents and delinquents only," and holding "that nondelinquent children coming within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court may not be…”
A.J. Vs. Dist. Ct. (state), 2017 NV 28 (Nev. 2017). “1981) (specifically mentioning the training center located in Caliente, Nevada, and determining that "[t]raining centers are meant to house delinquents and delinquents only," and holding "that nondelinquent children coming within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court may not be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.