Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 638.040 (2026)

Salary of members; per diem allowance and travel expenses of members and employees; payment of salaries and expenses

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NRS 638.040 Salary of members; per diem allowance and travel expenses of members and employees; payment of salaries and expenses.

1. Members of the Board are entitled to receive:

(a) A salary of not more than $150 per day, as fixed by the Board, while engaged in the business of the Board; and

(b) A per diem allowance and travel expenses at a rate fixed by the Board, while engaged in the business of the Board. The rate must not exceed the rate provided for state officers and employees generally.

2. While engaged in the business of the Board, each employee of the Board is entitled to receive a per diem allowance and travel expenses at a rate fixed by the Board. The rate must not exceed the rate provided for state officers and employees generally.

3. Salaries and expenses may be paid only to the extent that sufficient money is received from licensees.

[Part 7:17:1919; 1919 RL p. 3205; NCL § 7796]—(NRS A 1963, 155; 1975, 305, 1150; 1981, 1993; 1989, 1701; 2007, 2951)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2004–2004 · leading case: Gilman v. Nevada State Bd. of Veterinary Med. Examiners, 89 P.3d 1000 (Nev. 2004).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Gilman v. Nevada State Bd. of Veterinary Med. Examiners, 89 P.3d 1000 (Nev. 2004). · cites it 2× “They are entitled to a salary and per diem as set forth in NRS 638.040, NRS 281.160 and the regulations adopted by the State Board of Examiners.”

— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 638.040(2) — 1 case

Gilman v. Nevada State Bd. of Veterinary Med. Examiners, 89 P.3d 1000 (Nev. 2004). “They are entitled to a salary and per diem as set forth in NRS 638.040, NRS 281.160 and the regulations adopted by the State Board of Examiners.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.