Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 696B - DELINQUENT INSURERS: CONSERVATION, REHABILITATION AND LIQUIDATION
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 696B.280 (2026)

Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act and Insurer Receivership Model Act: Composition; severability; interpretation

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 696B.280  Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act and Insurer Receivership Model Act: Composition; severability; interpretation.

      1.  This section, NRS 696B.030 to 696B.180, inclusive, (definitions) and NRS 696B.290 to 696B.340, inclusive, comprise the Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act and the Insurer Receivership Model Act.

      2.  If any provision of the NAIC Acts or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the NAIC Acts which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of the NAIC Acts are declared to be severable.

      3.  The NAIC Acts shall be so interpreted as to effectuate the general purpose to make uniform the laws of those states which enact the Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act or the Insurer Receivership Model Act. To the extent that the provisions of the NAIC Acts, when applicable, conflict with other provisions of this Code, the provisions of the NAIC Acts shall control.

      4.  As used in this section, “NAIC Acts” means this section, NRS 696B.030 to 696B.180, inclusive, and NRS 696B.290 to 696B.340, inclusive.

      (Added to NRS by 1971, 1891; A 2019, 1725)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1989–2025 · leading case: Integrity Ins. v. Martin, 769 P.2d 69 (Nev. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Integrity Ins. v. Martin, 769 P.2d 69 (Nev. 1989). · cites it 2× “Specifically, Integrity contends that once the order of liquidation was issued Martin’s action was stayed and his exclusive remedy was to file a claim in the domiciliary state because no ancillary receiver had been appointed in Nevada.”
Prot. Ins. Co. v. State, Comm'r of Ins., 562 P.3d 215 (Nev. 2025). “Indeed, NRS 696B.280(3) instructs Nevada courts, in interpreting NRS Chapter 696B, to effectuate the general purpose to make uniform the laws of those states which enact the Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act or the Insurer Receivership Model Act.”
In the Matter of the Liquidation of Scottish RE (U.S.) Inc. (Del. Ch. 2025). · cites it 7× “1198 ; Nev. Rev. Stat. § 696B.280 (providing that Nevada’s version of the Uniform Act “shall be so interpreted as to effectuate the general purpose to make uniform the laws of those states which enact the Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act or the Insurer Receivership Model Act.”
Frontier Ins. Serv., Inc. v. State ex rel. Gates, 849 P.2d 328 (Nev. 1993). · cites it 2× “See NRS 696B.280. The general purpose of the UILA is “to make uniform the laws of those states which enact it.”
Frontier Ins. Serv. v. STATE, COM'R INS., 849 P.2d 328 (Nev. 1993). · cites it 2× “See NRS 696B.280. The general purpose of the UILA is "to make uniform the laws of those states which enact it.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 696B.280(3) — 3 cases
Prot. Ins. Co. v. State, Comm'r of Ins., 562 P.3d 215 (Nev. 2025). “Indeed, NRS 696B.280(3) instructs Nevada courts, in interpreting NRS Chapter 696B, to effectuate the general purpose to make uniform the laws of those states which enact the Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act or the Insurer Receivership Model Act.”
Integrity Ins. v. Martin, 769 P.2d 69 (Nev. 1989). “Specifically, Integrity contends that once the order of liquidation was issued Martin’s action was stayed and his exclusive remedy was to file a claim in the domiciliary state because no ancillary receiver had been appointed in Nevada.”
In the Matter of the Liquidation of Scottish RE (U.S.) Inc. (Del. Ch. 2025). “1198 ; Nev. Rev. Stat. § 696B.280 (providing that Nevada’s version of the Uniform Act “shall be so interpreted as to effectuate the general purpose to make uniform the laws of those states which enact the Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act or the Insurer Receivership Model Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.