Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 92A.180 (2026)

Merger of subsidiary into parent or parent into subsidiary

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 92A.180  Merger of subsidiary into parent or parent into subsidiary.

      1.  A parent domestic corporation, whether or not for profit, parent domestic limited-liability company, unless otherwise provided in the articles of organization or operating agreement, or parent domestic limited partnership owning at least 90 percent of the outstanding shares of each class of a subsidiary corporation entitled to vote on a merger, 90 percent of the percentage or other interest in the capital and profits of a subsidiary limited-liability company then owned by each class of members entitled to vote on a merger or 90 percent of the percentage or other interest in the capital and profits of a subsidiary limited partnership then owned by both the general partners and each class of limited partners entitled to vote on a merger may merge the subsidiary into itself without approval of the owners of the owner’s interests of the parent domestic corporation, parent domestic limited-liability company or parent domestic limited partnership or the owners of the owner’s interests of the subsidiary domestic corporation, subsidiary domestic limited-liability company or subsidiary domestic limited partnership.

      2.  A parent domestic corporation, whether or not for profit, parent domestic limited-liability company, unless otherwise provided in the articles of organization or operating agreement, or parent domestic limited partnership owning at least 90 percent of the outstanding shares of each class of a subsidiary corporation entitled to vote on a merger, 90 percent of the percentage or other interest in the capital and profits of a subsidiary limited-liability company then owned by each class of members entitled to vote on a merger, or 90 percent of the percentage or other interest in the capital and profits of a subsidiary limited partnership then owned by both the general partners and each class of limited partners entitled to vote on a merger may merge with and into the subsidiary without approval of the owners of the owner’s interests of the subsidiary domestic corporation, subsidiary domestic limited-liability company or subsidiary domestic limited partnership.

      3.  The board of directors of a parent corporation, the managers of a parent limited-liability company with managers unless otherwise provided in the operating agreement, all members of a parent limited-liability company without managers unless otherwise provided in the operating agreement, or all general partners of a parent limited partnership shall adopt a plan of merger that sets forth:

      (a) The names of the parent and subsidiary; and

      (b) The manner and basis of converting the owner’s interests of the disappearing entity into the owner’s interests, obligations or other securities of the surviving or any other entity or into cash or other property in whole or in part.

      4.  The surviving entity shall mail a copy or summary of the plan of merger to each owner of the subsidiary who does not waive the mailing requirement in writing.

      5.  Articles of merger under this section may not contain amendments to the constituent documents of the surviving entity except that the name of the surviving entity may be changed.

      6.  The articles of incorporation of a domestic corporation, the articles of organization of a domestic limited-liability company, the certificate of limited partnership of a domestic limited partnership or the certificate of trust of a domestic business trust may forbid that entity from entering into a merger pursuant to this section.

      (Added to NRS by 1995, 2083; A 1997, 727; 1999, 1627; 2001, 1410, 3199; 2005, 2203; 2009, 1717; 2015, 3242)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2003–2018 · leading case: Cohen v. Mirage Resorts, Inc., 62 P.3d 720 (Nev. 2003).
Cohen v. Mirage Resorts, Inc., 62 P.3d 720 (Nev. 2003). · cites it 2× “160, inclusive, or the articles of incorporation and he is entitled to vote on the merger; or (2) If the domestic corporation is a subsidiary and is merged with its parent under NRS 92A.180. (b) Consummation of a plan of exchange to which the domestic corporation is a party as…”
Liana Carrier Ltd. v. Pure Biofuels Corp., 672 F. App'x 85 (2d Cir. 2016). “Nev. Rev. Stat. § 92A.180(2). Liana Ltd. and Rimon allege that PBC Acquisition was a vehicle jointly controlled by FDS and Plainfield, used to hold their shares in Pure Biofuels and thereby effect the Short-Form Merger.”
Smith v. Kisorin USA, Inc., 254 P.3d 636 (Nev. 2011). · cites it 2× “, in accordance with NRS 92A.180 (governing short-form mergers, which may occur when one of the merging companies owns at least 90 percent of the other company’s shares).”
Peddie v. Spot Devices, Inc. (Nev. 2018). “160, inclusive, or the articles of incorporation, regardless of whether the stockholder is entitled to vote on the plan of merger; or (2) If the domestic corporation is a subsidiary and is merged with its parent pursuant to NRS 92A.180. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 4 (0) 1947A 2.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 92A.180(2) — 1 case
Liana Carrier Ltd. v. Pure Biofuels Corp., 672 F. App'x 85 (2d Cir. 2016). “Nev. Rev. Stat. § 92A.180(2). Liana Ltd. and Rimon allege that PBC Acquisition was a vehicle jointly controlled by FDS and Plainfield, used to hold their shares in Pure Biofuels and thereby effect the Short-Form Merger.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.