New Hampshire Revised Statutes

N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 357-C:4 (2026)

Delivery and Preparation Obligations

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NH-GCgc.nh.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

357-C:4 Delivery and Preparation Obligations. – Every manufacturer shall specify to the dealer, the delivery and preparation obligations of its motor vehicle dealers prior to delivery of new motor vehicles to retail buyers. A copy of the delivery and preparation obligations of its motor vehicle dealers and a schedule of the compensation to be paid by it to its motor vehicle dealers for the work and services they shall be required to perform in connection with such delivery and preparation obligations shall be filed with the New Hampshire motor vehicle industry board by every motor vehicle manufacturer. The compensation as set forth on such schedule shall be reasonable in the same manner as provided in RSA 357-C:5, II(b). No dealer shall charge any purchaser for work or services paid for by the manufacturer.

Source. 1981, 477:2. 1996, 263:2, eff. July 10, 1996.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2014–2015 · leading case: Deere & Co. v. State, 130 A.3d 1197 (N.H. 2015).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Deere & Co. v. State, 130 A.3d 1197 (N.H. 2015). “See RSA 357-C:4 (2009), :5, :7 (Supp. 2015). RSA chapter 357-C also defines unfair methods of competition and deceptive practices.”

Autofair 1477, L.P. v. Am. Honda Motor Co., Inc., 166 N.H. 599 (N.H. 2014). “Even though AHM had neither debited Autofair’s account nor held any disputed funds in escrow, Autofair specifically requested a “finding and ruling that the warranty audit charge backs and the [proposed] escrow violate RSA 357-C:4 and RSA 357-C:5, that the audit charge backs be…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.