New Mexico Statutes
N.M. Stat. § 1-4-22 (2026)
Cancellation of registration; petition to district court.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NM-LEGnmonesource.com
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A. At any time not less than one hundred twenty days prior to and following a statewide
election, the secretary of state may file and present to the district court a verified petition
alleging, on information and belief, that certain persons registered, named in the petition, are not
qualified electors in the precincts named in the petition. The petition shall contain a brief
statement of the facts upon which such allegation is made.
B. Upon filing and presentation of the petition, the court shall by order fix a day for hearing
thereon, which date shall be not less than fourteen days nor more than twenty-one days after
such order. The court shall direct the county clerk to use the address on the certificates of
registration to forthwith notify the persons named in the petition whose registration is sought to
be canceled of the date and purpose of the hearing and that each person should contact the
county clerk no later than the close of business the day before the hearing or be present at the
hearing if the person desires to oppose the cancellation.
C. If, after hearing, the court finds that the registration of any of the persons named in the
petition should be canceled, it shall by order direct the county clerk to cancel the registrations.
D. Within thirty days following a hearing held pursuant to this section, the secretary of state
shall report the results of the hearing to the United States election assistance commission and
to the voting section of the civil rights division of the United States department of justice. The
report required by this subsection shall be posted on the secretary of state's website for one
year following the hearing.
History: 1953 Comp., § 3-4-20, enacted by Laws 1969, ch. 240, § 78; 1975, ch. 255, § 43;
1995, ch. 124, § 4; 2011, ch. 137, § 34; 2019, ch. 212, § 52.
ANNOTATIONS
Cross references. — For person listed on purge list as ground for challenge, see 1-12-20
NMSA 1978.
The 2019 amendment, effective April 3, 2019, revised the deadline for the secretary of state to
petition the district court to cancel certain registrations, and required the secretary of state to
report the results of the hearing on the petition; in Subsection A, after "not less than", deleted
"ninety" and added "one hundred twenty", after "prior to", added "and following"; and added
Subsection D.
The 2011 amendment, effective July 1, 2011, changed the time the secretary of state may file a
petition from forty-two days to ninety days before an election; changed the time a court must
hear a petition from five days to fourteen days; and eliminated the liability of county chairmen
and groups of petitioners to pay the costs of the proceeding.
The 1995 amendment, effective January 1, 1996, substituted "any major political party" for
"either of the two major political parties" in Subsection A and made minor stylistic changes in
Subsections B and D.
Court without jurisdiction to entertain motion to dismiss purge petition. — District court
acted without jurisdiction in entertaining demurrer (now motion to dismiss, see Rules 1-007B
and 1-007C NMRA) to petition to purge registration list of county under Laws 1927, ch. 41 (now
repealed), it being unknown to the provisions of the act, and it being the duty of the district court
to hear the proofs and find the facts upon the allegations of the petition. Hannah v. District Court
of Fourth Judicial Dist., 1928-NMSC-053, 33 N.M. 533, 271 P. 469 (decided under former law).
Sufficient notice and hearing provided for purge petition. — Laws 1927, ch. 41 (now
repealed), which provided for petition to purge county registration list, sufficiently provided for
notice and hearing. Hannah v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist., 1928-NMSC-053, 33 N.M.
533, 271 P. 469 (decided under former law).
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 25 Am. Jur. 2d Elections § 184.
29 C.J.S. Elections § 48.Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2006–2010 · leading case: Repub. Party of N.M. v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Dep't, 2010 NMCA 80 (N.M. Ct. App. 2010).
Repub. Party of N.M. v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Dep't, 2010 NMCA 80 (N.M. Ct. App. 2010). “, to challenge voter eligibility pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 1-4-22 (1995), Plaintiffs would be required to disclose or publish the personal driver’s information they receive.”
Calkins v. Stearley, 149 P.3d 118 (N.M. Ct. App. 2006). “Under NMSA 1978, § 3-8-31(A)(1) (1999), candidates may appoint challengers for polling places in a municipal election.”
S Sederwall v. R Virden (N.M. Ct. App. 2009). “Section 1-1-4 and Section 1-4-22, governing the process by which voters 18 can challenge a citizen’s voter registration, requires factual allegations to show that 19 the voter does not meet the constitutional requirements for voter eligibility.”
Repub. Party of NM v. NM TAXATION, 242 P.3d 444 (N.M. Ct. App. 2010). “, to challenge voter eligibility pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 1-4-22 (1995), Plaintiffs would be required to disclose or publish the personal driver's information they receive.”
— N.M. Stat. § 1-4-22(A) — 4 cases
Calkins v. Stearley, 149 P.3d 118 (N.M. Ct. App. 2006). “Under NMSA 1978, § 3-8-31(A)(1) (1999), candidates may appoint challengers for polling places in a municipal election.”
Repub. Party of N.M. v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Dep't, 2010 NMCA 80 (N.M. Ct. App. 2010). “, to challenge voter eligibility pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 1-4-22 (1995), Plaintiffs would be required to disclose or publish the personal driver’s information they receive.”
S Sederwall v. R Virden (N.M. Ct. App. 2009). “Section 1-1-4 and Section 1-4-22, governing the process by which voters 18 can challenge a citizen’s voter registration, requires factual allegations to show that 19 the voter does not meet the constitutional requirements for voter eligibility.”
Repub. Party of NM v. NM TAXATION, 242 P.3d 444 (N.M. Ct. App. 2010). “, to challenge voter eligibility pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 1-4-22 (1995), Plaintiffs would be required to disclose or publish the personal driver's information they receive.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.