New Mexico Statutes
N.M. Stat. § 13-4-10 (2026)
Short title.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NM-LEGnmonesource.com
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sections 13-4-10 through 13-4-17 NMSA 1978 may be cited as the "Public Works
Minimum Wage Act".
History: 1953 Comp., § 6-6-10.1, enacted by Laws 1963, ch. 304, § 1; 2009, ch. 206, §
1.
ANNOTATIONS
The 2009 amendment, effective July 1, 2009, changed the reference of the act to
Sections 13-4-10 through 13-4-17 NMSA 1978.
Law reviews. — For 1984-88 survey of New Mexico administrative law, 19 N.M.L. Rev.
575 (1990).Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1986–2023 · leading case: Mem'l Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Tatsch Constr., Inc., 12 P.3d 431 (N.M. 2000).
Mem'l Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Tatsch Constr., Inc., 12 P.3d 431 (N.M. 2000). “{1} Appellant Memorial Medical Center Incorporated (MMCI), a private corporation, challenges the district court’s holding that it is subject to the Public Works Minimum Wage Act (PWMWA), NMSA 1978, §§ 13-4-10 to -17 (1963, as amended through 1999), and the Procurement Code (PC),…”
Cates v. Mosher Enter., Inc., 2017 NMCA 63 (N.M. Ct. App. 2017). “{1} Plaintiffs William Shawn Cates and Bobby Cheresposy, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, appeal, contending that the district court erred in determining that it did not have jurisdiction to entertain their private action under the Public Works Minimum…”
Garcia v. Bd. of Regents, 2014 NMCA 83 (N.M. Ct. App. 2014). “See NMSA 1978, §§ 13-4-10 to -17 (1937, as amended through 2011) (the PWMWA).”
Garcia v. UNM Bd. of Regents, 2014 NMCA 083 (N.M. Ct. App. 2014). “SeeNMSA 1978, §§ 13-4-10 to -17 (1937, as amended through 2011) (the PWMW A).”
Garcia v. UNM Bd. of Regents, 2016 NMCA 052 (N.M. Ct. App. 2016). “They sued Defendants for statutory minimum wage violations, including violation of the Public Works Minimum Wage Act (PWMWA), NMSA 1978, §§ 13-4-10 to -17 (1937, as amended through 2011).”
Grauerholtz v. New Mexico Labor & Indus. Comm'n, 726 P.2d 351 (N.M. 1986). “The Labor Commissioner, after a routine examination of payrolls submitted by Grauerholtz pursuant to the Public Works Minimum Wage Act (Act), NMSA 1978, Sections 13-4-10 to -17 (Repl.Pamp.1985), became aware that Grauerholtz was employing apprentices (also referred to as…”
Grauerholtz v. Nm Labor & Indus. Com'n, 726 P.2d 351 (N.M. 1986). “The Labor Commissioner, after a routine examination of payrolls submitted by Grauerholtz pursuant to the Public Works Minimum Wage Act (Act), NMSA 1978, Sections 13-4-10 to -17 (Repl.Pamp.1985), became aware that Grauerholtz was employing apprentices (also referred to as…”
Cates v. Mosher Enter., Inc. (N.M. Ct. App. 2017). “3 {1} Plaintiffs William Shawn Cates and Bobby Cheresposy, on behalf of 4 themselves and all others similarly situated, appeal, contending that the district court 5 erred in determining that it did not have jurisdiction to entertain their private action 6 under the Public Works…”
Murphy v. Lash (N.M. Ct. App. 2023). “, our Supreme Court answered what standard must 19 be met before an entity may be considered a “political subdivision” or “local public 20 body,” under the Public Works Minimum Wage Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 13-4-10 to -17 10 1 (1963, as amended through 2022), and the Procurement Code,…”
Cisneros v. EP Wrap-It Insulation, LLC (D.N.M. 2019). “§§ 50-4-19 to -30 (“MWA”), and Public Works Minimum Wage Act, N.M. Stat. Ann. §§ 13-4-10 to -17 (“PWMWA”).”
Murphy v. Lash (N.M. Ct. App. 2023). “, our Supreme Court answered what standard must be met before an entity may be considered a “political subdivision” or “local public body,” under the Public Works Minimum Wage Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 13-4-10 to -17 (1963, as amended through 2022), and the Procurement Code, NMSA 1978,…”
Garcia v. UNM Bd. of Regents, 2016 NMCA 52 (N.M. Ct. App. 2016). “They sued Defendants for statutory minimum wage violations, including violation of the Public Works Minimum Wage Act (PWMWA), NMSA 1978, §§ 13-4-10 to -17 (1937, as amended through 2011).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.