N.M. Stat. » N.M. Stat. / Chapter 21 / Article 10
New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 21-10-3 (2026)

Contracts with other institutions.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar 
New Mexico state university shall contract with other institutions of higher education,
located within this state, as needed for required services pursuant to the provisions and
purposes of this act [21-10-1 to 21-10-3 NMSA 1978]. Qualified Indian students who are
residents of New Mexico and who are majoring in agricultural, engineering and
associated management sciences at any institution of higher education located within
this state shall be eligible for the services provided by the funds appropriated for such
development program in this act.

History: 1953 Comp., § 73-26-39, enacted by Laws 1977, ch. 280, § 3.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases, 1973–1977 · leading case: Vaca v. Whitaker, 519 P.2d 315 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Vaca v. Whitaker, 519 P.2d 315 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974). · cites it 6× “Defendant sought, and this Court granted, an interlocutory appeal on the basis of § 21-10-3, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 4, Supp.”
Peralta v. Martinez, 564 P.2d 194 (N.M. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 2× “On February 15, 1971, Drs. Martinez and Jordan performed a spinal fusion on Peralta's back.”
Miller v. City of Albuquerque, 540 P.2d 254 (N.M. Ct. App. 1975). · cites it 2× “This order does not contain the requisite finding on which to base an application for an interlocutory appeal under § 21-10-3, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 4, Supp.”
In Re Doe, 516 P.2d 201 (N.M. Ct. App. 1973). · cites it 3× “Section 21-10-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl. Vol.”
Harrison v. Lucero, 525 P.2d 941 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974). · cites it 2× “This is an interlocutory appeal brought pursuant to Section 21-10-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 4, Supp.”
United Nuclear Corp. v. Gen. Atomic Co., 570 P.2d 305 (N.M. 1977). “We granted Detroit an interlocutory appeal pursuant to § 21-10-3, N.M.S.A., 1953 (Supp.1975). We have previously set forth New Mexico’s position on the issue of long-arm jurisdiction and the minimum contacts necessary to meet constitutional standards.”
Ridley v. First Nat'l Bank in Albuquerque, 531 P.2d 607 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974). · cites it 2× “This is an interlocutory appeal from an order of the district court pursuant to § 21-10-3, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 4, Supp.”
State Ex Rel. Norvell v. Arizona Pub. Serv. Co., 510 P.2d 98 (N.M. 1973). “Defendants filed an application for an order allowing appeal pursuant to § 21-10-3, N.M.S.A.1953. This court granted the application.”
Williams v. Arcoa Int'l, Inc., 523 P.2d 23 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974). · cites it 2× “Section 21-10-3, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol.”
Syroid Ex Rel. Syroid v. Albuquerque Gravel Prods. Co., 522 P.2d 570 (N.M. 1974). · cites it 2× “The trial court denied the motions of plaintiff, but, pursuant to the provisions of § 21-10-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 4, 1970, Supp.”
In Re Adoption of Doe, 531 P.2d 1226 (N.M. Ct. App. 1975). “We granted petitioners' application for an interlocutory appeal pursuant to § 21-10-3, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 4, 1970, Supp.”
City of Albuquerque v. Campos, 525 P.2d 848 (N.M. 1974). “Pursuant to the last three paragraphs above quoted from the interlocutory order of August 2, the City filed in this Court an Application for Order Allowing an Interlocutory Appeal as provided in § 21-10-3, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol. 4, 1970, Supp.”
Show all 16 citing cases →
— N.M. Stat. § 21-10-3(A) — 1 case
Vaca v. Whitaker, 519 P.2d 315 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974). “Defendant sought, and this Court granted, an interlocutory appeal on the basis of § 21-10-3, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 4, Supp.”
— N.M. Stat. § 21-10-3(B) — 1 case
Vaca v. Whitaker, 519 P.2d 315 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974). “Defendant sought, and this Court granted, an interlocutory appeal on the basis of § 21-10-3, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 4, Supp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.