N.M. Stat. » N.M. Stat. / Chapter 21 / Article 2
New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1 (2026)

Short title.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar 
Chapter 21, Article 2 NMSA 1978 may be cited as the "Post-Secondary Educational
Planning Act".

History: 1953 Comp., § 73-44-1, enacted by Laws 1973, ch. 233, § 1; 1986, ch. 24, § 7.

                                     ANNOTATIONS

Cross references. — For additional duties of higher education department, see 21-1-
26.11 NMSA 1978.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 366 cases, 1955–2004 · leading case: Lujan v. Gonzales, 501 P.2d 673 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lujan v. Gonzales, 501 P.2d 673 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972). · cites it 10× “On this basis, Lujan asks that we assess additional damages against Allstate pursuant to § 21-2-1 (17)(3), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol.”
Montgomery v. Cook, 413 P.2d 477 (N.M. 1966). · cites it 16× “Section 21-2-1(12) (2), N.M.S.A., 1953 Comp.”
State v. Vallejos, 519 P.2d 135 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974). · cites it 8× “Section 21-2-1(17) (1), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.”
Trujillo v. Tanuz, 508 P.2d 1332 (N.M. Ct. App. 1973). · cites it 9× “Plaintiff Violated Section 21-2-1(15) (16)(b)(c)(e), N.M.S.A.”
Terrel v. Duke City Lumber Co., Inc., 524 P.2d 1021 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974). · cites it 6× “Section 21-2-1 (16) (1), (2), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.”
Ortiz v. Ortiz & Torres Dri-Wall Co., 493 P.2d 418 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972). · cites it 8× “See § 21-2-1(15) (16), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol.”
State v. Gruender, 491 P.2d 1082 (N.M. Ct. App. 1971). · cites it 8× “Section 21-2-1(20) (2), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.”
Deats v. State, 503 P.2d 1183 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972). · cites it 8× “Section 21-2-1(15) (16) (a) provides that the statement of proceedings “shall include a concise statement showing date notice of appeal was filed and the date on which time for appeal commenced to run under Rule 5.”
State v. Lauderdale, 509 P.2d 1352 (N.M. Ct. App. 1973). · cites it 14× “Under § 21-2-1(1) (4), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 4), defendant requested oral argument pro se in this court.”
Jewell v. Seidenberg, 477 P.2d 296 (N.M. 1970). · cites it 4× “1 is reversible error? We find nothing in our rules, nor in the order adopting the U.”
Mabrey v. Mobil Oil Corp., 502 P.2d 297 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972). · cites it 7× “Relief cannot be sought under Rule 16(4) [§ 21-2-1(16) (4), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol.”
State v. Tijerina, 504 P.2d 642 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972). · cites it 7× “Section 21-2-1 (15)(14), N.M.S.A., 1953 Compilation (Repl.”
Show all 366 citing cases →
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(1) — 1 case
State v. Lauderdale, 509 P.2d 1352 (N.M. Ct. App. 1973). “Under § 21-2-1(1) (4), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 4), defendant requested oral argument pro se in this court.”
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(1)(4) — 1 case
State v. Lauderdale, 509 P.2d 1352 (N.M. Ct. App. 1973). “Under § 21-2-1(1) (4), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 4), defendant requested oral argument pro se in this court.”
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(1)(8) — 1 case
State v. Lauderdale, 509 P.2d 1352 (N.M. Ct. App. 1973). “Under § 21-2-1(1) (4), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 4), defendant requested oral argument pro se in this court.”
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(10) — 1 case
Williams v. City of Gallup, 421 P.2d 804 (N.M. 1966).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(12) — 10 cases
Montgomery v. Cook, 413 P.2d 477 (N.M. 1966). “Section 21-2-1(12) (2), N.M.S.A., 1953 Comp.”
State v. Romero, 526 P.2d 816 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974).
Porter v. Robert Porter & Sons, Inc., 359 P.2d 134 (N.M. 1961).
Robinson v. Black, 385 P.2d 971 (N.M. 1963).
Mine Supply, Inc. v. Elayer Co., 411 P.2d 354 (N.M. 1966).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(12)(1) — 1 case
Barelas Cmty. Ditch Corp. v. City of Albuquerque, 297 P.2d 1051 (N.M. 1956).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(13) — 8 cases
State v. Franklin, 428 P.2d 982 (N.M. 1967).
Com. Warehouse Co. v. Hyder Bros., Inc., 411 P.2d 978 (N.M. 1966).
Reger Ex Rel. Reger v. Preston, 420 P.2d 779 (N.M. 1966).
Porter v. Robert Porter & Sons, Inc., 359 P.2d 134 (N.M. 1961).
State v. Chavez, 501 P.2d 691 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(13)(7) — 1 case
Barelas Cmty. Ditch Corp. v. City of Albuquerque, 297 P.2d 1051 (N.M. 1956).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(14) — 13 cases
Westland Dev. Co. v. Saavedra, 459 P.2d 141 (N.M. 1969).
State Ex Rel. State High. Comm'n v. Sherman, 481 P.2d 104 (N.M. 1971).
Wilson v. Albuquerque Bd. of Realtors, 472 P.2d 371 (N.M. 1970).
Richardson Ford Sales v. Cummins, 393 P.2d 11 (N.M. 1964).
Foreman v. Myers, 444 P.2d 589 (N.M. 1968).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(15) — 58 cases
Trujillo v. Tanuz, 508 P.2d 1332 (N.M. Ct. App. 1973). “Plaintiff Violated Section 21-2-1(15) (16)(b)(c)(e), N.M.S.A.”
Ortiz v. Ortiz & Torres Dri-Wall Co., 493 P.2d 418 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972). “See § 21-2-1(15) (16), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol.”
Irwin v. Lámar, 399 P.2d 400 (N.M. 1964).
Novak v. Dow, 474 P.2d 712 (N.M. Ct. App. 1970).
Anderson v. Jenkins Constr. Co., 487 P.2d 1352 (N.M. Ct. App. 1971).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(15)(14) — 1 case
State v. Montoya, 520 P.2d 275 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(15)(14)(d) — 1 case
Las Luminarias of the New Mexico Council of the Blind v. Isengard, 587 P.2d 444 (N.M. Ct. App. 1978).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(15)(16) — 1 case
Otero v. Burgess, 505 P.2d 1251 (N.M. Ct. App. 1973).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(15)(16)(a) — 1 case
Deats v. State, 503 P.2d 1183 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972). “Section 21-2-1(15) (16) (a) provides that the statement of proceedings “shall include a concise statement showing date notice of appeal was filed and the date on which time for appeal commenced to run under Rule 5.”
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(15)(16)(b) — 2 cases
Trujillo v. Tanuz, 508 P.2d 1332 (N.M. Ct. App. 1973). “Plaintiff Violated Section 21-2-1(15) (16)(b)(c)(e), N.M.S.A.”
Beckwith v. Cactus Drilling Corp., 505 P.2d 1241 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(15)(16)(b)(c) — 1 case
Trujillo v. Tanuz, 508 P.2d 1332 (N.M. Ct. App. 1973). “Plaintiff Violated Section 21-2-1(15) (16)(b)(c)(e), N.M.S.A.”
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(15)(6) — 4 cases
Trujillo v. Tanuz, 508 P.2d 1332 (N.M. Ct. App. 1973). “Plaintiff Violated Section 21-2-1(15) (16)(b)(c)(e), N.M.S.A.”
Morris v. Dodge Country, Inc., 513 P.2d 1273 (N.M. Ct. App. 1973).
Gen. Servs. Corp. v. Bd. of Commissioners, 408 P.2d 51 (N.M. 1965).
Romero v. Sanchez, 519 P.2d 291 (N.M. 1974).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(16) — 6 cases
State v. Lauderdale, 509 P.2d 1352 (N.M. Ct. App. 1973). “Under § 21-2-1(1) (4), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 4), defendant requested oral argument pro se in this court.”
Mabrey v. Mobil Oil Corp., 502 P.2d 297 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972). “Relief cannot be sought under Rule 16(4) [§ 21-2-1(16) (4), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol.”
Barelas Cmty. Ditch Corp. v. City of Albuquerque, 297 P.2d 1051 (N.M. 1956).
Baca v. Ceballos, 469 P.2d 516 (N.M. Ct. App. 1970).
Garcia v. Universal Constructors, Inc., 472 P.2d 668 (N.M. Ct. App. 1970).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(16)(1) — 1 case
Terrel v. Duke City Lumber Co., Inc., 524 P.2d 1021 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974). “Section 21-2-1 (16) (1), (2), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.”
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(16)(3) — 1 case
State v. Lauderdale, 509 P.2d 1352 (N.M. Ct. App. 1973). “Under § 21-2-1(1) (4), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 4), defendant requested oral argument pro se in this court.”
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(16)(4) — 2 cases
Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. Ogden, 870 P.2d 143 (N.M. Ct. App. 1994).
State v. Lauderdale, 509 P.2d 1352 (N.M. Ct. App. 1973). “Under § 21-2-1(1) (4), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 4), defendant requested oral argument pro se in this court.”
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(17) — 56 cases
Jewell v. Seidenberg, 477 P.2d 296 (N.M. 1970). “1 is reversible error? We find nothing in our rules, nor in the order adopting the U.”
State v. Valdez, 495 P.2d 1079 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972).
Ortiz v. Ortiz & Torres Dri-Wall Co., 493 P.2d 418 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972). “See § 21-2-1(15) (16), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol.”
State v. Vallejos, 519 P.2d 135 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974). “Section 21-2-1(17) (1), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.”
Terrel v. Duke City Lumber Co., Inc., 524 P.2d 1021 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974). “Section 21-2-1 (16) (1), (2), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.”
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(17)(1) — 2 cases
State v. Vallejos, 519 P.2d 135 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974). “Section 21-2-1(17) (1), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.”
Morris Ex Rel. Morris v. Fitzgerald, 385 P.2d 574 (N.M. 1963).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(17)(10) — 3 cases
Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. Ogden, 870 P.2d 143 (N.M. Ct. App. 1994).
Phillips v. Smith, 528 P.2d 663 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974).
Maxwell Ex Rel. Maxwell v. Santa Fe Pub. Schs., 534 P.2d 307 (N.M. Ct. App. 1975).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(17)(2) — 1 case
Great Am. Ins. Co. v. Brown, 524 P.2d 199 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(17)(3) — 1 case
Miller v. Connecticut Gen. Life Ins. Co., 502 P.2d 1011 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(18) — 2 cases
Woodson v. Lee, 392 P.2d 419 (N.M. 1964).
Sproul Constr. Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins., 392 P.2d 339 (N.M. 1964).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(20) — 62 cases
State v. Gruender, 491 P.2d 1082 (N.M. Ct. App. 1971). “Section 21-2-1(20) (2), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.”
State v. Austin, 461 P.2d 230 (N.M. Ct. App. 1969).
Barnett v. Cal M, Inc., 445 P.2d 974 (N.M. 1968).
State v. Everitt, 450 P.2d 927 (N.M. Ct. App. 1969).
State v. Tijerina, 504 P.2d 642 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972). “Section 21-2-1 (15)(14), N.M.S.A., 1953 Compilation (Repl.”
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(20)(1) — 2 cases
Keeth Gas Co., Inc. v. Jackson Creek Cattle Co., 570 P.2d 918 (N.M. 1977).
Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. New Mexico State Corp. Comm'n, 516 P.2d 689 (N.M. 1973).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(22) — 2 cases
Davis v. Severson, 379 P.2d 774 (N.M. 1963).
Royal Indem. Co. v. Bottone, 343 P.2d 1042 (N.M. 1959).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(24) — 5 cases
Roberson v. Bd. of Educ. of City of Santa Fe, 430 P.2d 868 (N.M. 1967).
State v. Zinn, 460 P.2d 240 (N.M. 1969).
State Racing Comm'n v. McManus, 476 P.2d 767 (N.M. 1970).
Baca v. Burks, 467 P.2d 392 (N.M. 1970).
Albuquerque Nat'l Bank v. Second Jud. Dist. Court, 426 P.2d 204 (N.M. 1967).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(26) — 1 case
In Re Removal of Thaxton, 437 P.2d 129 (N.M. 1968).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(29) — 4 cases
Deats v. State, 451 P.2d 981 (N.M. 1969).
Roberson v. Bd. of Educ. of City of Santa Fe, 430 P.2d 868 (N.M. 1967).
Gulf Oil Corp. v. Rota-Cone Field Operating Co., 515 P.2d 640 (N.M. 1973).
State Ex Rel. Townsend v. Court of Appeals, 428 P.2d 473 (N.M. 1967).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(3) — 12 cases
Matter of D'Angelo, 733 P.2d 360 (N.M. 1986).
In Re Patton, 519 P.2d 288 (N.M. 1974).
In Re Nelson, 450 P.2d 188 (N.M. 1969).
In Re Morris, 397 P.2d 475 (N.M. 1964).
In Re Sedillo, 498 P.2d 1353 (N.M. 1972).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(31) — 1 case
In Re Will of Callaway, 500 P.2d 410 (N.M. 1972).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(32) — 3 cases
State v. Vallejos, 519 P.2d 135 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974). “Section 21-2-1(17) (1), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.”
State Ex Rel. Norvell v. Credit Bureau of Albuquerque, Inc., 514 P.2d 40 (N.M. 1973).
State v. Aguilar, 536 P.2d 263 (N.M. Ct. App. 1975).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(5) — 92 cases
Lujan v. Gonzales, 501 P.2d 673 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972). “On this basis, Lujan asks that we assess additional damages against Allstate pursuant to § 21-2-1 (17)(3), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol.”
State v. Garcia, 680 P.2d 613 (N.M. Ct. App. 1984).
Valley Bank of Com. v. Hilburn, 105 P.3d 294 (N.M. Ct. App. 2004).
Ammerman v. Hubbard Broad., Inc., 551 P.2d 1354 (N.M. 1976).
Trujillo v. Beaty Elec. Co., Inc., 577 P.2d 431 (N.M. Ct. App. 1978).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(5)(1) — 2 cases
Deats v. State, 503 P.2d 1183 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972). “Section 21-2-1(15) (16) (a) provides that the statement of proceedings “shall include a concise statement showing date notice of appeal was filed and the date on which time for appeal commenced to run under Rule 5.”
Serna v. Bd. of Cty. Com'rs of Bernalillo Cnty., 540 P.2d 212 (N.M. 1975).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(5)(2) — 1 case
Speckner v. Riebold, 523 P.2d 10 (N.M. 1974).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(5)(3) — 1 case
State v. Lauderdale, 509 P.2d 1352 (N.M. Ct. App. 1973). “Under § 21-2-1(1) (4), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 4), defendant requested oral argument pro se in this court.”
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(5)(4) — 1 case
State v. Marchiondo, 515 P.2d 146 (N.M. Ct. App. 1973).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(5)(5) — 4 cases
Lujan v. Gonzales, 501 P.2d 673 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972). “On this basis, Lujan asks that we assess additional damages against Allstate pursuant to § 21-2-1 (17)(3), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol.”
State Ex Rel. Norvell v. Credit Bureau of Albuquerque, Inc., 514 P.2d 40 (N.M. 1973).
Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. Ogden, 870 P.2d 143 (N.M. Ct. App. 1994).
Nevarez v. State Armory Bd., 502 P.2d 287 (N.M. 1972).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(7) — 9 cases
Montgomery v. Cook, 413 P.2d 477 (N.M. 1966). “Section 21-2-1(12) (2), N.M.S.A., 1953 Comp.”
Sierra Life Ins. v. First Nat'l Life Ins., 512 P.2d 1245 (N.M. 1973).
Reynolds v. Ruidoso Racing Ass'n, Inc., 365 P.2d 671 (N.M. 1961).
Frederick v. Younger Van Lines, 393 P.2d 438 (N.M. 1964).
Mabrey v. Mobil Oil Corp., 502 P.2d 297 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972). “Relief cannot be sought under Rule 16(4) [§ 21-2-1(16) (4), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol.”
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(7)(2) — 1 case
Jones & Laughlin Supply v. Dugan Prod. Corp., 508 P.2d 1348 (N.M. Ct. App. 1973).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(8) — 5 cases
Baker v. Shufflebarger & Assocs., Inc., 436 P.2d 502 (N.M. 1968).
Home Fire & Marine Ins. v. Pan Am. Petroleum Corp., 381 P.2d 675 (N.M. 1963).
Terrel v. Lowdermilk, 391 P.2d 419 (N.M. 1964).
Zamora v. Foster, 500 P.2d 1001 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972).
Brown v. New Mexico State Bd. of Educ., 488 P.2d 734 (N.M. 1971).
— N.M. Stat. § 21-2-1(9) — 7 cases
Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Anaya, 428 P.2d 640 (N.M. 1967).
State v. United Bonding Ins. Co., 464 P.2d 884 (N.M. 1970).
Gregg v. Gardner, 388 P.2d 68 (N.M. 1963).
Burroughs v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 397 P.2d 10 (N.M. 1964).
State v. Cebada, 502 P.2d 409 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.