N.M. Stat. » N.M. Stat. / Chapter 22 / Article 10
New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 22-10-20 (2026)

Repealed.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar 
ANNOTATIONS
Repeals. — Laws 1986, ch. 33, § 33 repealed 22-10-20 NMSA 1978, as amended by
Laws 1975, ch. 306, § 15, effective May 21, 1986. For present comparable provisions,
see 22-10A-25 NMSA 1978.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1982–1994 · leading case: Bd. of Educ. of Alamogordo Pub. Schs. Dist. No. 1 v. Jennings, 651 P.2d 1037 (N.M. Ct. App. 1982).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bd. of Educ. of Alamogordo Pub. Schs. Dist. No. 1 v. Jennings, 651 P.2d 1037 (N.M. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 38× “Jennings appealed to the State Board of Education, § 22-10-20, N.M.S.A. 1978, which reversed the Local Board.”
Redman v. Bd. of Regents of New Mexico, 693 P.2d 1266 (N.M. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 17× “The State Board has the authority to adopt regulations governing the conduct of de novo hearings pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 22-2-1 (Repl.Pamp.1981), which provides, “The state board may promulgate, publish and enforce regulations to exercise its authority granted pursuant to…”
Bd. of Educ. of Carlsbad v. Harrell, 882 P.2d 511 (N.M. 1994). · cites it 4× “The hearing on review of a local school board’s decision is now held before an independent arbitrator instead of before the State Board, and judicial review of the arbitrator’s decision is limited to whether “the decision was procured by corruption, fraud, deception or collusion.”
Bd. of Educ. v. New Mexico State Bd. of Educ., 740 P.2d 123 (N.M. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 6× “” The Local Board, after a hearing conducted under the provisions of NMSA 1978, Section 22-10-20 (Repl. Pamp.1984), that included the testimony of twenty-eight witnesses, found that Wilkinson had engaged in immoral conduct with one of the students at Melrose High School and…”
Bd. of Educ. of Alamogordo Pub. Sch. Dist. No. 1. v. Jennings, 701 P.2d 361 (N.M. 1985). · cites it 2× “Section 22-10-20(1) supra, requires that the State Board’s decision “shall contain .”
Bd. of Educ. of Taos Mun. Sch. v. Singleton, 712 P.2d 1384 (N.M. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “The court held that the initial delay in commencing the hearing and the subsequent delay in completing the discharge hearing were not in accordance with the requirements of NMSA 1978, Section 22-10-20(D) (Repl.Pamp.1984). The time specified for conducting a dismissal hearing…”
State Ex Rel. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Manfre, 693 P.2d 1273 (N.M. Ct. App. 1984). “1983) (tax); § 22-10-20 (Repl.Pamp.1984) (board of education); § 74-4-5 (Repl.”
Weber v. Dep't of Motor Vehs., 818 P.2d 1221 (N.M. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “We note that our reading of subsection F is consistent with the qualified allowances in subsection C for continuances.”
— N.M. Stat. § 22-10-20(1) — 3 cases
Bd. of Educ. of Alamogordo Pub. Schs. Dist. No. 1 v. Jennings, 651 P.2d 1037 (N.M. Ct. App. 1982). “Jennings appealed to the State Board of Education, § 22-10-20, N.M.S.A. 1978, which reversed the Local Board.”
Bd. of Educ. of Alamogordo Pub. Sch. Dist. No. 1. v. Jennings, 701 P.2d 361 (N.M. 1985). “Section 22-10-20(1) supra, requires that the State Board’s decision “shall contain .”
Redman v. Bd. of Regents of New Mexico, 693 P.2d 1266 (N.M. Ct. App. 1984). “The State Board has the authority to adopt regulations governing the conduct of de novo hearings pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 22-2-1 (Repl.Pamp.1981), which provides, “The state board may promulgate, publish and enforce regulations to exercise its authority granted pursuant to…”
— N.M. Stat. § 22-10-20(A) — 1 case
Redman v. Bd. of Regents of New Mexico, 693 P.2d 1266 (N.M. Ct. App. 1984). “The State Board has the authority to adopt regulations governing the conduct of de novo hearings pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 22-2-1 (Repl.Pamp.1981), which provides, “The state board may promulgate, publish and enforce regulations to exercise its authority granted pursuant to…”
— N.M. Stat. § 22-10-20(C) — 1 case
Bd. of Educ. of Alamogordo Pub. Schs. Dist. No. 1 v. Jennings, 651 P.2d 1037 (N.M. Ct. App. 1982). “Jennings appealed to the State Board of Education, § 22-10-20, N.M.S.A. 1978, which reversed the Local Board.”
— N.M. Stat. § 22-10-20(D) — 2 cases
Redman v. Bd. of Regents of New Mexico, 693 P.2d 1266 (N.M. Ct. App. 1984). “The State Board has the authority to adopt regulations governing the conduct of de novo hearings pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 22-2-1 (Repl.Pamp.1981), which provides, “The state board may promulgate, publish and enforce regulations to exercise its authority granted pursuant to…”
Bd. of Educ. of Taos Mun. Sch. v. Singleton, 712 P.2d 1384 (N.M. Ct. App. 1985). “The court held that the initial delay in commencing the hearing and the subsequent delay in completing the discharge hearing were not in accordance with the requirements of NMSA 1978, Section 22-10-20(D) (Repl.Pamp.1984). The time specified for conducting a dismissal hearing…”
— N.M. Stat. § 22-10-20(E) — 2 cases
Bd. of Educ. of Alamogordo Pub. Schs. Dist. No. 1 v. Jennings, 651 P.2d 1037 (N.M. Ct. App. 1982). “Jennings appealed to the State Board of Education, § 22-10-20, N.M.S.A. 1978, which reversed the Local Board.”
Redman v. Bd. of Regents of New Mexico, 693 P.2d 1266 (N.M. Ct. App. 1984). “The State Board has the authority to adopt regulations governing the conduct of de novo hearings pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 22-2-1 (Repl.Pamp.1981), which provides, “The state board may promulgate, publish and enforce regulations to exercise its authority granted pursuant to…”
— N.M. Stat. § 22-10-20(G) — 1 case
Bd. of Educ. v. New Mexico State Bd. of Educ., 740 P.2d 123 (N.M. Ct. App. 1987). “” The Local Board, after a hearing conducted under the provisions of NMSA 1978, Section 22-10-20 (Repl. Pamp.1984), that included the testimony of twenty-eight witnesses, found that Wilkinson had engaged in immoral conduct with one of the students at Melrose High School and…”
— N.M. Stat. § 22-10-20(G)(2) — 1 case
Bd. of Educ. v. New Mexico State Bd. of Educ., 740 P.2d 123 (N.M. Ct. App. 1987). “” The Local Board, after a hearing conducted under the provisions of NMSA 1978, Section 22-10-20 (Repl. Pamp.1984), that included the testimony of twenty-eight witnesses, found that Wilkinson had engaged in immoral conduct with one of the students at Melrose High School and…”
— N.M. Stat. § 22-10-20(I) — 1 case
Bd. of Educ. of Alamogordo Pub. Schs. Dist. No. 1 v. Jennings, 651 P.2d 1037 (N.M. Ct. App. 1982). “Jennings appealed to the State Board of Education, § 22-10-20, N.M.S.A. 1978, which reversed the Local Board.”
— N.M. Stat. § 22-10-20(J) — 2 cases
Redman v. Bd. of Regents of New Mexico, 693 P.2d 1266 (N.M. Ct. App. 1984). “The State Board has the authority to adopt regulations governing the conduct of de novo hearings pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 22-2-1 (Repl.Pamp.1981), which provides, “The state board may promulgate, publish and enforce regulations to exercise its authority granted pursuant to…”
Bd. of Educ. of Alamogordo Pub. Schs. Dist. No. 1 v. Jennings, 651 P.2d 1037 (N.M. Ct. App. 1982). “Jennings appealed to the State Board of Education, § 22-10-20, N.M.S.A. 1978, which reversed the Local Board.”
— N.M. Stat. § 22-10-20(J)(l) — 1 case
Bd. of Educ. v. New Mexico State Bd. of Educ., 740 P.2d 123 (N.M. Ct. App. 1987). “” The Local Board, after a hearing conducted under the provisions of NMSA 1978, Section 22-10-20 (Repl. Pamp.1984), that included the testimony of twenty-eight witnesses, found that Wilkinson had engaged in immoral conduct with one of the students at Melrose High School and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.