New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 22-7-2 (2026)

Repealed.

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

History: 1953 Comp., § 77-4A-2, enacted by Laws 1977, ch. 308, § 2; repealed by
Laws 2019, ch. 212, § 284.

                                  ANNOTATIONS

Repeals. — Laws 2019, ch. 212, § 284 repealed 22-7-2 NMSA 1978, as enacted by
Laws 1977, ch. 308, § 2, relating to purpose of act, effective April 3, 2019. For
provisions of former section, see the 2018 NMSA 1978 on NMOneSource.com.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1971–2017 · leading case: Cordova v. Cline, 2017 NMSC 20 (N.M. 2017).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Cordova v. Cline, 2017 NMSC 20 (N.M. 2017). “See §§ 22-7-2, -8. {4} After collecting the requisite signatures, CQE submitted its petition to the Taos County Clerk as required under the Recall Act.”

Lauderdale Ex Rel. Leyba v. Hydro Conduit Corp., 555 P.2d 700 (N.M. Ct. App. 1976). · cites it 3× “Where the spouses have separated, consideration has been given to the cause of the separation; the inquiry most often centered on which spouse was at “fault” for the separation. 3 Nelson, Divorce and Annulment (2nd Ed.”

Murphy v. Murphy, 631 P.2d 307 (N.M. 1981). · cites it 2× “The trial court relied on Section 22-7-2, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Supp.1975), now Section 40-4-3 N.”

Gilmore v. Gilmore, 750 P.2d 1114 (N.M. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “The Bernalillo County district court divided the parties’ property and awarded wife $250 per month in alimony pursuant to NMSA 1953, Section 22-7-2 (now codified as NMSA 1978, Section 40-4-3 (Repl.”

Cordova v. Cline (N.M. 2017). “See 6 §§ 22-7-2, -8. 7 {4} After collecting the requisite signatures, CQE submitted its petition to the Taos 8 County Clerk as required under the Recall Act.”

Hensley v. Zarges, 487 P.2d 481 (N.M. 1971). “The case now before us was filed pursuant to § 22-7-2, N.M.S.A.1953, for the purpose of having the property rights of the parties determined.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.