New Mexico Statutes
N.M. Stat. § 24-1-11 (2026)
Reporting of blood tests.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NM-LEGnmonesource.com
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
In reporting every birth and stillbirth, physicians and others required to make such reports shall state on the certificate whether a blood test for syphilis has been made upon a specimen of blood taken from the mother of the child for which a birth or stillbirth certificate is filed and the approximate date when the specimen was taken. History: 1953 Comp., § 12-34-11, enacted by Laws 1973, ch. 359, § 11.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases, 1956–1990 · leading case: Watson Truck & Supply Co., Inc. v. Males, 801 P.2d 639 (N.M. 1990).
Watson Truck & Supply Co., Inc. v. Males, 801 P.2d 639 (N.M. 1990). “The court went on to state: "The purpose of [the Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act, NMSA 1953, §§ 24-1-11 to 24-1-18] is to provide for a proportionate allocation of the burden among tort-feasors who are liable.”
Kriz v. Buckeye Petroleum Co., Inc., 701 P.2d 1182 (Ariz. 1985). “§§ 2A:53A-1 -2A:53A-5 (1952); N.M.Stat. Ann. §§ 24-1-11 -24-1-18 (1953); N.”
Rio Grande Gas Co. v. Stahmann Farms, Inc., 457 P.2d 364 (N.M. 1969). “We first consider the motion to dismiss because even though the court may have erred in directing the verdict in Stahmann's favor, a reversal would accomplish nothing if, under the most favorable view of the evidence, Rio Grande could recover neither indemnity nor contribution.…”
Rodgers v. Galindo, 360 P.2d 400 (N.M. 1961). “or the right to contribution from, one whose concurrent negligence produced the injury of the plaintiff in the tort action, where, because of a marital, filial, or other family relationship between such injured person and the tortfeasor against whom contribution is sought, the…”
Lincenberg v. Issen, 318 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 1975). “§ 2A:53A-1-5; N.M. Stat. Ann. §§ 24-1-11 to 24-1-18 (1953); N.”
Sierra Blanca Sales Co. v. Newco Indus., Inc., 542 P.2d 52 (N.M. Ct. App. 1975). “To introduce the illusion that the plaintiff here has been fully compensated because the discharge is binding will return the courts to the dissension over the release rules which the adoption of the Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act (§§ 24-1-11 to 24-1-18, N.M.S.A.…”
Beal v. S. Union Gas Co., 349 P.2d 337 (N.M. 1960). “§ 24-1-11 et seq. In this complaint, issue was not joined between the plaintiffs and the city.”
Bailey v. Jeffries-Eaves, Inc., 414 P.2d 503 (N.M. 1966). “20 is the correct amount of damages in view of the evidence submitted at the trial.”
Beal Ex Rel. Boatwright v. S. Union Gas Co., 304 P.2d 566 (N.M. 1956). “That case also considered the question in the light of our joint tortfeasors’ contribution act, § 24-1-11 to § 24 — 1-18, N.M.S.A.1953. It is said at 222 F.”
Garrison v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc., 392 P.2d 580 (N.M. 1964). “Having determined that the release, in this case, was taken pursuant to the statute, §§ 24-1-11 to 24-1-18, N.M.S.A. 1953, appellants’ contention that the release of one joint tortfeasor releases all joint tortfeasors is without merit.”
Sanford v. Stoll, 518 P.2d 1210 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974). “Section 24-1-11, N. M.S.A.1953 (Vol.5) reads: For the purposes of this act the term “joint tortfeasors” means two [2] or more persons jointly or severally liable in tort for the same injury to person or property, whether or not judgment has been recovered against all or some of…”
Herrera v. Uhl, 452 P.2d 474 (N.M. 1969). “The questions presented are (a) whether the Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act, § 24-1-11 et seq., 1953 Comp., changed the common law rule that a release of one joint tortfeasor releases all, and (b) whether satisfaction of judgment under the above statute operates as to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.