New Mexico Statutes
N.M. Stat. § 27-2-12 (2026)
Medical assistance programs.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NM-LEGnmonesource.com
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A. Consistent with the federal act and subject to the appropriation and availability of
federal and state funds, the medical assistance division of the department may by rule
provide medical assistance, including the services of licensed doctors of oriental
medicine, licensed chiropractic physicians, licensed dental therapists and licensed
dental hygienists in collaborating practice, to persons eligible for public assistance
programs under the federal act.
B. Subject to appropriation and availability of federal, state or other funds received
by the state from public or private grants or donations, the medical assistance division
of the department may by rule provide medical assistance, including assistance in the
payment of premiums for medical or long-term care insurance, to children up to the age
of twelve if not part of a sibling group; children up to the age of eighteen if part of a
sibling group that includes a child up to the age of twelve; and pregnant women who are
residents of the state of New Mexico and who are ineligible for public assistance under
the federal act. The department, in implementing the provisions of this subsection,
shall:
(1) establish rules that encourage pregnant women to participate in prenatal
care; and
(2) not provide a benefit package that exceeds the benefit package provided
to state employees.
History: 1953 Comp., § 13-17-15, enacted by Laws 1973, ch. 376, § 16; 1991, ch. 144,
§ 1; 1993, ch. 158, § 1; 2003, ch. 343, § 1; 2006, ch. 2, § 1; 2019, ch. 107, § 15.
ANNOTATIONS
Cross references. — For meaning of "federal act", see 27-2-2 NMSA 1978.
For payment for hospital care, see 27-2-9 NMSA 1978.
The 2019 amendment, effective June 14, 2019, included the services of licensed
dental therapists within the provisions of the medical assistance programs; and in
Subsection A, added "licensed dental therapists".
The 1991 amendment, effective June 14, 1991, substituted "medical assistance
division of the human services department" for "board" and inserted "including the
services of licensed oriental medical doctors and licensed chiropractors".
The 2006 amendment, effective May 17, 2006, added Subsection B to provide for
medical assistance, including payment of insurance premiums, for children and
pregnant women ineligible for federally funded public assistance.
The 2003 amendment, effective June 20, 2003, inserted "chiropractic physicians and
licensed dental hygienists in collaborative practice" near the end.
The 1993 amendment, effective June 18, 1993, substituted "licensed doctors of oriental
medicine" for "licensed oriental medical doctors".
Abortions. — Rule prohibiting the use of state funds to pay for abortions for medicaid-
eligible women, except when necessary to save the life of the mother, to end an ectopic
pregnancy, or when the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest violates the equal rights
amendment to N.M. Const., art. II, § 18. N.M. Right to Choose/NARAL v. Johnson,
1999-NMSC-005, 126 N.M. 788, 975 P.2d 841, cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1020, 119 S. Ct.
1256, 143 L. Ed. 2d 352 (1999).
Chiropractors' services not required under state medicaid program. —
Chiropractors' services are not physicians' services under the medicaid program.
Chiropractors' services thus are not included in the general categories of medical
treatment which must be included in the state plan. Katz v. N.M. Dep't of Human Servs.,
1981-NMSC-012, 95 N.M. 530, 624 P.2d 39 (decided prior to 1991 amendment).
Services of a physical therapist are not required to be included in the state plan. Katz
v. N.M. Dep't of Human Servs., 1981-NMSC-012, 95 N.M. 530, 624 P.2d 39.
Denial of services not denial of equal protection. — The denial of medicaid benefits
for the services of chiropractors and physical therapists is not so arbitrary and
unreasonable as to constitute a denial of equal protection. Katz v. N.M. Dep't of Human
Servs., 1981-NMSC-012, 95 N.M. 530, 624 P.2d 39 (decided prior to 1991
amendment).
Medical assistance division does not have the authority to resolve discrimination
claims. — Where petitioner, a member of a managed care organization (MCO) that
contracts with the human services department (HSD) [health care authority department]
to administer the provision of medicaid benefits and services, including non-emergency
medical transportation, to eligible members, made requests of the MCO, pursuant to
Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA Title II) and Section 504 of
the federal Rehabilitation Act, for certain accommodations in the provision of
transportation services, and where the MCO denied petitioner’s request for reasonable
accommodations in accessing medicaid services, and where petitioner requested a fair
hearing to appeal the failure of the MCO and HSD to grant her reasonable
accommodations in medicaid transportation services, the district court did not err in
affirming HSD’s medical assistance division’s (division) dismissal of the matter, because
neither the Public Assistance Act nor the Medicaid Act relied on by petitioner expressly
grants the division the power to resolve discrimination claims raised by a medicaid
beneficiary challenging an agency’s denial or inaction in response to a request for
accommodation, nor is any such power vested in the division by any regulation
promulgated under state law. Law v. N.M. Human Servs. Dep’t, 2019-NMCA-066, cert.
denied.
Law reviews. — For article, "Freedom at Home – State Constitutions and Medicaid
Funding for Abortions", see 26 N. M. L. Rev. 433 (1996).
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — Transsexual surgery as covered
operation under state medical assistance program, 2 A.L.R.4th 775.
Limitation on right of chiropractors and osteopathic physicians to participate in public
medical welfare programs, 8 A.L.R.4th 1056.Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2024 · leading case: New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. Johnson, 975 P.2d 841 (N.M. 1998).
New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. Johnson, 975 P.2d 841 (N.M. 1998). “{6} Section 27-2-12 of New Mexico’s Public Assistance Act, NMSA 1978, § 27-2-12 (1993), authorizes the Medical Assistance Division of the Human Services Department to issue regulations regarding the provision of medical assistance to persons eligible for public assistance…”
State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Johnson, 961 P.2d 768 (N.M. 1998). “, NMSA 1978, § 27-2-10 (1973) (food stamp program); NMSA 1978, § 27-2-12 (1973, as amended 1993) (medical assistance); NMSA 1978, § 27-2-6.”
Katz v. New Mexico Dep't of Human Servs., 624 P.2d 39 (N.M. 1981). “Section 27-2-12, N.M.S.A.1978, therefore requires that the DHS must operate the program consistent with the federal act.”
Conaway v. Deane, 932 A.2d 571 (Md. 2007). “[39] Pursuant to N.M. Stat. § 27-2-12 (1993), the Department was responsible for establishing rules to administer New Mexico's Public Assistance Act.”
All. Health of Santa Teresa, Inc. v. Nat'l Presto Indus., Inc., 173 P.3d 55 (N.M. Ct. App. 2007). “§ 1396c (providing for discontinuation of federal payments if the state plan does not comply with the federal requirements).”
Starko. Inc. v. N.M. Human Servs. Dep't, 2014 NMSC 33 (N.M. 2014). “See NMSA 1978, § 27-2-12 (2006) (providing for medical assistance programs “[c]onsistent with the federal act and subject to the appropriation and availability of federal and state funds”).”
Kahrs v. Sanchez, 956 P.2d 132 (N.M. Ct. App. 1997). “See NMSA 1978, § 27-2-12 (1993). 4. Plaintiff applied for medicaid on or about December 26, 1989.”
Starko, Inc. v. New Mexico Human Servs. Dep't, 2014 NMSC 033 (N.M. 2014). “See NMSA 1978, § 27-2-12 (2006) (providing for medical assistance programs “[c]onsistent with the federal act and subject to the appropriation and availability of federal and state funds”).”
Carter v. New Mexico Human Servs. Dep't, 211 P.3d 219 (N.M. Ct. App. 2009). “NMSA 1978, § 9-8-13 (2007); NMSA 1978, § 27-2-12 (2006). The Disabled and Elderly Waiver (D & E Waiver) program constitutes one of the many benefits available to persons under Medicaid.”
M.G. v. Scrase (D.N.M. 2024). “0 Contracts defined “Managed Care Organization (MCO)” as: “an entity that participates in Centennial Care under contract with HSD to assist the State in meeting the requirements established under NMSA 1978, § 27-2-12.” Turquoise Care Contracts define “Managed Care Organization…”
Law v. N.M. Human Servs. Dep’t (N.M. Ct. App. 2019). “See § 27-2-12; 8.200.400.9 NMAC. {14} As relevant here, the federal Medicaid statute defines “medical assistance” to include non-emergency medical transportation.”
— N.M. Stat. § 27-2-12(A) — 1 case
Law v. N.M. Human Servs. Dep’t (N.M. Ct. App. 2019). “See § 27-2-12; 8.200.400.9 NMAC. {14} As relevant here, the federal Medicaid statute defines “medical assistance” to include non-emergency medical transportation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.