New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-4 (2026)

Definitions.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
As used in the Children's Code:

   A. "active efforts" means efforts that are affirmative, active, thorough and timely and
that represent a higher standard of conduct than reasonable efforts;

   B. "adult" means a person who is eighteen years of age or older;

   C. "child" means a person who is less than eighteen years old;

   D. "council" means the substitute care advisory council established pursuant to
Section 32A-8-4 NMSA 1978;
    E. "court", when used without further qualification, means the children's court
division of the district court and includes the judge, special master or commissioner
appointed pursuant to the provisions of the Children's Code or supreme court rule;

    F. "court-appointed special advocate" means a person appointed pursuant to the
provisions of the Children's Court Rules to assist the court in determining the best
interests of the child by investigating the case and submitting a report to the court;

   G. "custodian" means an adult with whom the child lives who is not a parent or
guardian of the child;

   H. "department" means the children, youth and families department, unless
otherwise specified;

   I. "disproportionate minority contact" means the involvement of a racial or ethnic
group with the criminal or juvenile justice system at a proportion either higher or lower
than that group's proportion in the general population;

   J. "federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978" means the federal Indian Child Welfare
Act of 1978, as that act may be amended or its sections renumbered;

   K. "foster parent" means a person, including a relative of the child, licensed or
certified by the department or a child placement agency to provide care for children in
the custody of the department or agency;

   L. "guardian" means a person appointed as a guardian by a court or Indian tribal
authority;

   M. "guardian ad litem" means an attorney appointed by the children's court to
represent and protect the best interests of the child in a case; provided that no party or
employee or representative of a party to the case shall be appointed to serve as a
guardian ad litem;

   N. "Indian" means, whether an adult or child, a person who is:

       (1)    a member of an Indian tribe; or

       (2)    eligible for membership in an Indian tribe;

    O. "Indian child" means an Indian person, or a person whom there is reason to know
is an Indian person, under eighteen years of age, who is neither:

       (1)    married; or

       (2)    emancipated;
   P. "Indian child's tribe" means:

    (1)     the Indian tribe in which an Indian child is a member or eligible for
membership; or

      (2)    in the case of an Indian child who is a member or eligible for membership
in more than one tribe, the Indian tribe with which the Indian child has more significant
contacts;

   Q. "Indian custodian" means an Indian who, pursuant to tribal law or custom or
pursuant to state law:

       (1)    is an adult with legal custody of an Indian child; or

       (2)    has been transferred temporary physical care, custody and control by the
parent of the Indian child;

     R. "Indian tribe" means an Indian nation, tribe, pueblo or other band, organized
group or community of Indians recognized as eligible for the services provided to
Indians by the secretary because of their status as Indians, including an Alaska native
village as defined in 43 U.S.C. Section 1602(c) or a regional corporation as defined in
43 U.S.C. Section 1606. For the purposes of notification to and communication with a
tribe as required in the Indian Family Protection Act [32A-28-1 to 32A-28-42 NMSA
1978], "Indian tribe" also includes those tribal officials and staff who are responsible for
child welfare and social services matters;

   S. "judge", when used without further qualification, means the judge of the court;

    T. "legal custody" means a legal status created by order of the court or other court
of competent jurisdiction or by operation of statute that vests in a person, department or
agency the right to determine where and with whom a child shall live; the right and duty
to protect, train and discipline the child and to provide the child with food, shelter,
personal care, education and ordinary and emergency medical care; the right to consent
to major medical, psychiatric, psychological and surgical treatment and to the
administration of legally prescribed psychotropic medications pursuant to the Children's
Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Act [32A-6A-1 to 32A-6A-30 NMSA
1978]; and the right to consent to the child's enlistment in the armed forces of the United
States;

   U. "member" or "membership" means a determination made by an Indian tribe that a
person is a member of or eligible for membership in that Indian tribe;

    V. "parent" or "parents" means a biological or adoptive parent if the biological or
adoptive parent has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in the care and custody
of the child or a person who has lawfully adopted an Indian child pursuant to state law
or tribal law or tribal custom;
    W. "permanency plan" means a determination by the court that the child's interest
will be served best by:

       (1)    reunification;

      (2)    placement for adoption after the parents' rights have been relinquished or
terminated or after a motion has been filed to terminate parental rights;

       (3)    placement with a person who will be the child's permanent guardian;

      (4)    placement in the legal custody of the department with the child placed in
the home of a fit and willing relative; or

     (5)     placement in the legal custody of the department under a planned
permanent living arrangement;

   X. "person" means an individual or any other form of entity recognized by law;

    Y. "plan of safe care" means a written plan created by a health care professional
intended to ensure the immediate and ongoing safety and well-being of a substance-
exposed newborn or to provide perinatal support to a pregnant person with substance
use disorder by addressing the treatment needs of the child and any of the child's
parents, relatives, guardians, custodians or caretakers to the extent those treatment
needs are relevant to the safety of the child;

   Z. "preadoptive parent" means a person with whom a child has been placed for
adoption;

    AA. "protective supervision" means the right to visit the child in the home where the
child is residing, inspect the home, transport the child to court-ordered diagnostic
examinations and evaluations and obtain information and records concerning the child;

   BB. "relative" means a person related to another person:

        (1)    by blood within the fifth degree of consanguinity or through marriage by
the fifth degree of affinity; or

        (2)     with respect to an Indian child, as established or defined by the Indian
child's tribe's custom or law;

   CC. "reservation" means:

       (1)    "Indian country" as defined in 18 U.S.C. Section 1151;

       (2)     any lands to which the title is held by the United States in trust for the
benefit of an Indian tribe or individual; or
      (3)    any lands held by an Indian tribe or individual subject to a restriction by
the United States against alienation;

   DD. "reunification" means either a return of the child to the parent or to the home
from which the child was removed or a return to the noncustodial parent;

   EE. "secretary" means the United States secretary of the interior;

    FF. "tribal court" means a court with jurisdiction over child custody proceedings that
is either a court of Indian offenses, a court established and operated under the law or
custom of an Indian tribe or any other administrative body that is vested by an Indian
tribe with authority over child custody proceedings;

   GG. "tribal court order" means a document issued by a tribal court that is signed by
an appropriate authority, including a judge, governor or tribal council member, and that
orders an action that is within the tribal court's jurisdiction; and

   HH. "tribunal" means any judicial forum other than the court.

History: 1978 Comp., § 32A-1-4, enacted by Laws 1993, ch. 77, § 13; 1995, ch. 206, §
2; 1999, ch. 77, § 2; 2003, ch. 225, § 1; 2005, ch. 189, § 1; 2009, ch. 239, § 7; 2016, ch.
60, § 1; 2019, ch. 190, § 1; 2022, ch. 41, § 44; 2023, ch. 90, § 2; 2025, ch. 156, § 3.

                                      ANNOTATIONS

Cross references. — For the Children's Court Rules, see 10-101 NMRA et seq.

For the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, see 25 U.S.C. § 1901.

The 2025 amendment, effective June 20, 2025, revised the definition of the term "plan
of safe care" as used in the Children's Code; in Subsection Y, after "plan of" added
"safe", added "written" preceding the second occurrence of "plan", added "immediate
and ongoing" preceding "safety and well-being", after "newborn" added "or to provide
perinatal support to a pregnant person with substance use disorder", after "guardians"
deleted "family members" and added "custodians" and replaced "caregivers" with
"caretakers".

The 2023 amendment, effective July 1, 2023, revised the definition of "guardian"; and
in Subsection L, after "Indian tribal authority", deleted "or a person authorized to care for
the child by a parental power of attorney as permitted by law".

The 2022 amendment, effective July 1, 2022, defined "active efforts", "federal Indian
Child Welfare Act of 1978", "Indian", "Indian custodian", "member" or "membership",
"reservation", and "secretary", and revised the definitions of "Indian child", "Indian tribe",
"parent" or "parents", "relative", and "tribal court", as used in the Children's Code; added
a new Subsection A and redesignated former Subsections A through H as Subsections
B through I, respectively; added a new Subsection J and redesignated former
Subsections I through K as Subsections K through M, respectively; added a new
Subsection N and redesignated former Subsections L and M as Subsections O and P,
respectively; in Subsection O, after "means an", deleted "unmarried person who is" and
added "Indian person, or a person whom there is reason to know is an Indian person
under eighteen years of age, who is neither", and added Paragraphs O(1) and O(2);
added a new Subsection Q and redesignated former Subsections N through P as
Subsections R through T, respectively; in Subsection R, after "means", deleted
"federally recognized Indian tribe, community or group pursuant to 25 U.S.C. Section
1903(1)" and added "an Indian nation, tribe, pueblo or other band, organized group or
community of Indians recognized as eligible for the services provided to Indians,
including an Alaska native village as defined in 43 U.S.C. Section 1602(c) or a regional
corporation as defined in 43 U.S.C. Section 1606. For the purposes of notification to
and communication with a tribe as required in the Indian Family Protection Act, 'Indian
tribe' also includes those tribal officials and staff who are responsible for child welfare
and social services matters"; added a new Subsection U and redesignated former
Subsections Q through W as Subsections V through BB, respectively; in Subsection V,
after "custody of the child", added "or a person who has lawfully adopted an Indian child
pursuant to state law or tribal law or tribal custom"; in Subsection BB, added Paragraph
BB(2); added Subsection CC and redesignated former Subsection X as Subsection DD;
added Subsection EE and redesignated former Subsections Y through AA as
Subsections FF through HH, respectively; and in Subsection FF, deleted former
Paragraphs (1) and (2) and added "a court with jurisdiction over child custody
proceedings that is either a court of Indian offenses, a court established and operated
under the law or custom of an Indian tribe or any other administrative body that is
vested by an Indian tribe with authority over child custody proceedings".

The 2019 amendment, effective June 14, 2019, defined "plan of care" as used in the
Children's Code; and added a new Subsection T and redesignated former Subsections
T through Z as Subsections U through AA, respectively.

The 2016 amendment, effective July 1, 2016, defined "council" and "relative" as used
in the Children’s Code; added new Subsection C and redesignated former Subsections
C through T as Subsections D through U, respectively; in Subsection E, after "special
advocate", deleted "or ‘CASA’", after "person appointed", deleted "as a CASA", and
after "Court Rules", deleted "who assists" and added "to assist"; in Subsection K, after
"the child in a", deleted "court proceeding" and added "case", and after "party to the",
deleted "proceeding" and added "case"; and added a new Subsection V and
redesignated the succeeding subsections accordingly.

The 2009 amendment, effective July 1, 2009, added Subsection G.

The 2005 amendment, effective June 17, 2005, defined "custodian" in Subsection E to
mean an adult with whom a child lives who is not a parent or guardian of the child;
defined "guardian" in Subsection H to mean a person appointed as a guardian by a
court, Indian tribal authority or a person with parental power of attorney; deleted the
definition of "guardianship" in former Subsection I; added the definition of "Indian tribe"
in Subsection L; provided in Subsection N that "legal custody" includes a legal status
created by operation of statute and includes the right and duty to provide personal care
of a child; deleted from the former provisions in Subsection N that the rights and duties
of legal custody were subject to the rights of the guardian of the child and that required
a person granted legal custody to exercise the custodial rights personally; deleted the
former provision in Subsection O that a parent retains the duties of guardianship and
legal custody of a child; defined "permanency plan" in Subsection P to include a
determination that a child's interest will be served best by a reunification or placement
with a person who will be the child's permanent guardian; added the definition of
"protective supervision" in Subsection S; and added the definition of "reunification" in
Subsection T.

The 2003 amendment, effective July 1, 2003, substituted "a person" for "an individual"
in Subsections A and B; deleted "and Forms" following "Children's Court Rules" in
Subsection D; substituted "a person" for "any persons" following "residential facility or"
in Subsection E; substituted "A person" for "An individual" preceding "granted legal
custody" in Subsection N; substituted "with the child placed in the home of a fit and
willing relative" for "until the child reaches the age of majority, unless the child is
emancipated, pursuant to the Emancipation of Minors Act" in Paragraph P(4); deleted
"that meets the department's definition of long-term foster care" at the end of Paragraph
P(5).

The 1999 amendment, effective July 1, 1999, deleted "but is not necessarily limited in
either number or kind to" at the end of Subsection I; in Subsection O, inserted the
language beginning "if the biological" to the end of the first sentence and added the
second sentence; and added Subsections P and R, and redesignated the subsequent
subsections accordingly.

The 1995 amendment, effective July 1, 1995, in Subsection G, inserted "or certified"
following "licensed"; in Subsection N, inserted "department" preceding "or agency" and
the language beginning "the right to" and ending "Disabilities Act;"; in Subsection O,
substituted "biological" for "natural"; added Subsections Q and R; and redesignated
former Subsection Q as Subsection S.

Decisions under prior law. — In light of the similarity of the provisions, annotations
decided under former Section 32-1-3 NMSA 1978 have been included in the
annotations to this section.

Stepfather as "custodian". — A stepfather meets the definition of "custodian" for
purposes of the court's subject matter jurisdiction over him in a proceeding on a petition
alleging abuse or neglect of a child. State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Dep't (In re
Candice Y.), 2000-NMCA-035, 128 N.M. 813, 999 P.2d 1045, cert. denied, 129 N.M.
207, 4 P.3d 35.
Human services department [health care authority department] not "person". —
State health and social services (now human services) department was not a "person"
within the meaning of the Children's Code. Thus, the department need not be made a
party to nor was its presence required in any action filed pursuant to the Children's
Code where it may be ordered to assume certain responsibilities pursuant to the
Children's Code. In re Doe, 1975-NMCA-152, 88 N.M. 632, 545 P.2d 491.

Ex parte conduct rule inapplicable to guardians ad litem. — Rule 16-402 NMRA of
the Rules of Professional Conduct does not prohibit guardians ad litem from
communicating ex parte with department of children, youth and families social workers;
although attorneys, guardians ad litem do not have typical attorney-client relationships
with children, and are therefore not bound by that rule. State ex rel. Children, Youth &
Families Dep't v. George F., 1998-NMCA-119, 125 N.M. 597, 964 P.2d 158, cert.
denied, 125 N.M. 654, 964 P.2d 818.

Legal custody provides the right to determine placement of children. — Absent an
abuse of its discretion, when the children, youth and families department (department)
has legal custody of a child, the department alone is permitted to determine where and
with whom the child will be placed. State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Dep’t v.
Jerry K., 2015-NMCA-047, cert. denied, 2015-NMCERT-004.

Where father pleaded no contest to the allegation that his children were neglected as a
result of father’s inability to discharge his responsibilities to and for them because of
incarceration, and where the district court ordered the children into the legal custody of
the children, youth and families department (department), the department had the sole
discretionary authority, absent an abuse of discretion, to decide with whom the children
would be placed, despite father’s own preferences for placement of the children. State
ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Dep’t v. Jerry K., 2015-NMCA-047, cert. denied,
2015-NMCERT-004.

"Legal custody" continues until terminated by appropriate authority. — A parent
has a legal right to the custody of his child unless that right had been terminated,
however temporarily, by appropriate authority. State v. Sanders, 1981-NMCA-053, 96
N.M. 138, 628 P.2d 1134.

A parent's legal right to custody of a child does not end until entry of, and the giving of
notice of, a judgment in compliance with Rule 62(a), N.M.R. Child. Ct. (now 10-352
NMRA), requiring a signed written judgment and disposition. State v. Sanders, 1981-
NMCA-053, 96 N.M. 138, 628 P.2d 1134.

Age references are to years of age, not mental age. — The numerous references to
age in the Children's Code are references to years of age, not mental age. State v. Doe,
1982-NMCA-028, 97 N.M. 598, 642 P.2d 201, cert denied, 98 N.M. 50, 644 P.2d 1039.

Law reviews. — For comment, "Navajo Grandparents - ‘Parent’ or ‘Stranger’ - A Child
Custody Determination," see 9 N.M.L. Rev. 187 (1978-79).
For article, "The New Mexico Children's Code: Some Remaining Problems," see 10
N.M.L. Rev. 341 (1980).

For article, "Child Welfare Under the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978: A New Mexico
Focus," see 10 N.M.L. Rev. 413 (1980).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 39 cases (10 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case: Chatterjee v. King, 2012 NMSC 19 (N.M. 2012).
Chatterjee v. King, 2012 NMSC 19 (N.M. 2012). · cites it 11× “” Compare § 32A-1-4(P) (2009), with § 32A-1-4(O) (2005). If, as posited by the Court of Appeals, the Legislature equates the word “natural” with “biological,” there would have been no need for the Legislature to amend the definition of “parent” in 1995.”
State v. Allen, 994 P.2d 728 (N.M. 1999). · cites it 4× “Second, we note that at the time of her death the victim was still a child within the meaning of the Children's Code, see NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-4(B) (1999), and state law affords a reasonable degree of confidentiality in abuse and neglect cases, see NMSA 1978, § 32A-4-33 (1993);…”
State ex rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't, 2000 NMCA 035 (N.M. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 6× “Under NMSA 1978, § 32A-1^(0) (1995), “parent” includes a biological or adoptive parent; under Section 32A-1-4(E), “custodian” means a person, other than a parent or guardian, who exercises physical control, care, or custody of the child; and under Section 32A-1-4(H), “guardian”…”
State v. RUDY B., 216 P.3d 810 (N.M. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 4× “…from the adult criminal process. See NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-1 (1995) (naming Chapter 32A NMSA as the "Children's Code"); NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-4(C) (2003) (amended 2005 and 2009) (defining the children's court); NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-5 (1993) (establishing the children's court); §§…”
State ex rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't v. Browind C., 2007 NMCA 023 (N.M. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 3× “See NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-4(P) (2005) (defining “permanency plan” as a determination that the interest of the child is best served by one of several options, including reunification, adoption, and permanent guardianship); see also § 32A-4-22(J); Rule 10-325(A) NMRA.”
State Ex Rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't v. Cosme V., 215 P.3d 747 (N.M. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 4× “See § 32A-1-4(E), (H) (defining "custodian" and "guardian").”
State v. Montoya, 104 P.3d 540 (N.M. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 4× “{17} In addition, as the State points out, "child" is defined in the child abuse statute, and elsewhere, as a person under the age of eighteen.”
State v. Samora, 2016 NMSC 031 (N.M. 2016). · cites it 2× “n, § 24(A)(1)), and because the alleged victim was a child under NMSA 1978, Section 32A-1-4(B) (2005, amended 2016), since state law affords some degree of confidentiality in child abuse and neglect cases.”
A.N. v. Alamogordo Police Dep't, 928 F.3d 1191 (10th Cir. 2019). “Because a child is defined for these purposes as a person who is less than eighteen years old, see N.M. Stat. Ann. § 32A-1-4(A), it is further undisputed that A.”
Hunt v. Green, 376 F. Supp. 2d 1043 (D.N.M. 2005). · cites it 6× “NEW MEXICO LAW ON CUSTODY The Defendants cite NMSA § 32A-1-4(N) as giving them authority to seize E.”
State v. Muniz, 11 P.3d 613 (N.M. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 4× “See § 32A-1-4(B) (defining "child"); Majority Opinion, ¶ 14.”
State v. ADAM M., 953 P.2d 40 (N.M. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “” NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-4(B) (1995); NMSA 1978, § 32-1-3(A) (1992).”
— N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-4(A) — 1 case
A.N. v. Alamogordo Police Dep't, 928 F.3d 1191 (10th Cir. 2019). “Because a child is defined for these purposes as a person who is less than eighteen years old, see N.M. Stat. Ann. § 32A-1-4(A), it is further undisputed that A.”
— N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-4(B) — 6 cases
State v. Allen, 994 P.2d 728 (N.M. 1999). “Second, we note that at the time of her death the victim was still a child within the meaning of the Children's Code, see NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-4(B) (1999), and state law affords a reasonable degree of confidentiality in abuse and neglect cases, see NMSA 1978, § 32A-4-33 (1993);…”
State v. Montoya, 104 P.3d 540 (N.M. Ct. App. 2005). “{17} In addition, as the State points out, "child" is defined in the child abuse statute, and elsewhere, as a person under the age of eighteen.”
State v. Samora, 2016 NMSC 031 (N.M. 2016). “n, § 24(A)(1)), and because the alleged victim was a child under NMSA 1978, Section 32A-1-4(B) (2005, amended 2016), since state law affords some degree of confidentiality in child abuse and neglect cases.”
State v. ADAM M., 953 P.2d 40 (N.M. Ct. App. 1997). “” NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-4(B) (1995); NMSA 1978, § 32-1-3(A) (1992).”
State v. Ortiz, 2021 NMSC 029 (N.M. 2021).
— N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-4(C) — 7 cases
State v. RUDY B., 216 P.3d 810 (N.M. Ct. App. 2009). “…from the adult criminal process. See NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-1 (1995) (naming Chapter 32A NMSA as the "Children's Code"); NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-4(C) (2003) (amended 2005 and 2009) (defining the children's court); NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-5 (1993) (establishing the children's court); §§…”
State v. Muniz, 11 P.3d 613 (N.M. Ct. App. 2000). “See § 32A-1-4(B) (defining "child"); Majority Opinion, ¶ 14.”
In re Kleinsmith, 2005 NMCA 136 (N.M. Ct. App. 2005).
State ex rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't v. Djamila B., 2014 NMCA 045 (N.M. Ct. App. 2014).
— N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-4(E) — 2 cases
State Ex Rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't v. Cosme V., 215 P.3d 747 (N.M. Ct. App. 2009). “See § 32A-1-4(E), (H) (defining "custodian" and "guardian").”
State ex rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't, 2000 NMCA 035 (N.M. Ct. App. 2000). “Under NMSA 1978, § 32A-1^(0) (1995), “parent” includes a biological or adoptive parent; under Section 32A-1-4(E), “custodian” means a person, other than a parent or guardian, who exercises physical control, care, or custody of the child; and under Section 32A-1-4(H), “guardian”…”
— N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-4(F) — 5 cases
Soon v. Kammann, 557 P.3d 104 (N.M. 2024).
Soon v. Kammann (N.M. 2024).
Soon v. Kammann (N.M. 2024).
State Ex Rel. CYFD v. Timothy T.-L. (N.M. Ct. App. 2021).
Arredondo v. Locklear, 371 F. Supp. 2d 1281 (D.N.M. 2005).
— N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-4(G) — 1 case
State v. Gonzales (N.M. Ct. App. 2024).
— N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-4(H) — 1 case
State ex rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't, 2000 NMCA 035 (N.M. Ct. App. 2000). “Under NMSA 1978, § 32A-1^(0) (1995), “parent” includes a biological or adoptive parent; under Section 32A-1-4(E), “custodian” means a person, other than a parent or guardian, who exercises physical control, care, or custody of the child; and under Section 32A-1-4(H), “guardian”…”
— N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-4(I) — 4 cases
State ex rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't, 2000 NMCA 035 (N.M. Ct. App. 2000). “Under NMSA 1978, § 32A-1^(0) (1995), “parent” includes a biological or adoptive parent; under Section 32A-1-4(E), “custodian” means a person, other than a parent or guardian, who exercises physical control, care, or custody of the child; and under Section 32A-1-4(H), “guardian”…”
State ex rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't v. Djamila B., 2014 NMCA 045 (N.M. Ct. App. 2014).
State ex rel. CYFD v. Djamila B., 2014 NMCA 45 (N.M. Ct. App. 2014).
— N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-4(J) — 1 case
State ex rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't v. George F., 1998 NMCA 119 (N.M. Ct. App. 1998).
— N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-4(K) — 4 cases
State ex rel. CYFD v. Marsalee P., 2013 NMCA 62 (N.M. Ct. App. 2013).
State v. Schmidt (N.M. Ct. App. 2026).
— N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-4(L) — 1 case
State ex rel. CYFD v. Tanisha G. (N.M. Ct. App. 2019).
— N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-4(N) — 1 case
Hunt v. Green, 376 F. Supp. 2d 1043 (D.N.M. 2005). “NEW MEXICO LAW ON CUSTODY The Defendants cite NMSA § 32A-1-4(N) as giving them authority to seize E.”
— N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-4(N)(2003) — 1 case
Hunt v. Green, 376 F. Supp. 2d 1043 (D.N.M. 2005). “NEW MEXICO LAW ON CUSTODY The Defendants cite NMSA § 32A-1-4(N) as giving them authority to seize E.”
— N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-4(O) — 8 cases
State Ex Rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't v. Cosme V., 215 P.3d 747 (N.M. Ct. App. 2009). “See § 32A-1-4(E), (H) (defining "custodian" and "guardian").”
Chatterjee v. King, 2012 NMSC 19 (N.M. 2012). “” Compare § 32A-1-4(P) (2009), with § 32A-1-4(O) (2005). If, as posited by the Court of Appeals, the Legislature equates the word “natural” with “biological,” there would have been no need for the Legislature to amend the definition of “parent” in 1995.”
State ex rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't v. Casey J., 2015 NMCA 088 (N.M. Ct. App. 2015).
State ex rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't v. Casey J., 2015 NMCA 88 (N.M. Ct. App. 2015).
State ex rel. CYFD v. Djamila B., 2014 NMCA 45 (N.M. Ct. App. 2014).
— N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-4(P) — 5 cases
Chatterjee v. King, 2012 NMSC 19 (N.M. 2012). “” Compare § 32A-1-4(P) (2009), with § 32A-1-4(O) (2005). If, as posited by the Court of Appeals, the Legislature equates the word “natural” with “biological,” there would have been no need for the Legislature to amend the definition of “parent” in 1995.”
State ex rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't v. Browind C., 2007 NMCA 023 (N.M. Ct. App. 2006). “See NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-4(P) (2005) (defining “permanency plan” as a determination that the interest of the child is best served by one of several options, including reunification, adoption, and permanent guardianship); see also § 32A-4-22(J); Rule 10-325(A) NMRA.”
State ex rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't v. Djamila B., 2014 NMCA 045 (N.M. Ct. App. 2014).
State ex rel. CYFD v. Djamila B., 2014 NMCA 45 (N.M. Ct. App. 2014).
— N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-4(P)(3) — 1 case
State ex rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't v. Browind C., 2007 NMCA 023 (N.M. Ct. App. 2006). “See NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-4(P) (2005) (defining “permanency plan” as a determination that the interest of the child is best served by one of several options, including reunification, adoption, and permanent guardianship); see also § 32A-4-22(J); Rule 10-325(A) NMRA.”
— N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-4(Q) — 2 cases
State ex rel. CYFD v. Christopher B., 2014 NMCA 16 (N.M. Ct. App. 2013).
— N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-4(T) — 1 case
State ex rel. CYFD v. Eric E., 544 P.3d 307 (N.M. Ct. App. 2023).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.