New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 36-2-1 (2026)

[Rules defining and regulating practice of law; authority of

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
supreme court; distribution; effective date.]
    The supreme court of the state of New Mexico shall, by rules promulgated from time
to time, define and regulate the practice of law within the state of New Mexico. The
supreme court shall cause such rules to be printed and distributed to all members of the
bar, to applicants for admission and to all courts within the state of New Mexico and the
same shall not become effective until thirty (30) days after the same shall have been
made ready for distribution and so distributed.

History: 1941 Comp., § 18-101, enacted by Laws 1941, ch. 96, § 1; 1953 Comp., § 18-
1-1.

                                     ANNOTATIONS

Bracketed material. — The bracketed material was inserted by the compiler and is not
part of the law.
Cross references. — For right of attorney to portion of land as fee in actions quieting
title, see 42-6-10 NMSA 1978.

For limitation of fees in proceedings before employment security commission, see 51-1-
37 NMSA 1978.

For limitation on fees in workmen's compensation cases, see 52-1-54 NMSA 1978.

For incorporation by attorneys, see 53-6-1 NMSA 1978.

For provisions of Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, see Rule 15-101 NMRA et
seq.

For provisions of Rules of Professional Conduct, see Rule 16-101 NMRA et seq.

For provisions of Rules Governing Discipline, see Rule 17-101 NMRA et seq.

Authority of supreme court. — The supreme court’s constitutional power of
superintending control encompasses the court’s authority and duty to prescribe the
qualifications for admission to the bar, to prescribe standards of conduct for lawyers, to
determine what constitutes grounds for the discipline of lawyers and to discipline, for
cause, any person admitted to practice law in New Mexico. Any legislative attempt to
limit what conduct the court may consider as grounds for imposing attorney discipline
would be an unconstitutional infringement on the court’s authority to regulate the
practice of law. In re Treinen, 2006-NMSC-013, 139 N.M. 318, 131 P.3d 1282.

Prime purpose of licensing attorneys and in making them the exclusive practitioners
in their field is to protect the public from the evils occasioned by unqualified persons
performing legal services. State Bar v. Guardian Abstract & Title Co., 1978-NMSC-016,
91 N.M. 434, 575 P.2d 943.

Purpose of attorney regulation. — The close regulation of those who practice law is
to protect the unwary and the uninformed from injury at the hands of persons unskilled
or unlearned in the law. State Bar v. Guardian Abstract & Title Co., 1978-NMSC-016, 91
N.M. 434, 575 P.2d 943.

Power of legislature to regulate admission to bar. — The process of admitting to the
bar comprehends fixing standards as to mental and scholastic qualifications and
determining whether the applicant meets such requirements. The exercise thereof is a
judicial function, inherent in the courts. The legislature may enact valid laws in aid of
such functions and may, if in furtherance thereof, fix minimum requirements, but in no
event, maximum requirements; and may not require the courts to admit on standards
other than as accepted or established by the courts. Any legislation which attempts to
do so is an invasion of the judicial power and violative of the constitutional provisions
establishing the separate branches of government and prohibiting the legislature from
invading the judiciary. In re Sedillo, 1959-NMSC-095, 66 N.M. 267, 347 P.2d 162.
Authority to discipline lawyers. — The New Mexico state racing commission does not
have the authority to prohibit an attorney from representing a client before the
commission in adjudicatory proceedings or public hearings on the basis of alleged
misconduct: The supreme court has the exclusive authority to discipline lawyers. 1987
Op. Att'y Gen. No. 87-61.

Law reviews. — For article, " 'To Purify the Bar': A Constitutional Approach to Non-
Professional Misconduct," see 5 Nat. Resources J. 299 (1965).

For article, "Separation of Powers and the Judicial Rule-Making Power in New Mexico:
The Need for Prudential Restraints," see 15 N.M.L. Rev. 407 (1985).

Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 7 Am. Jur. 2d Attorneys at Law §§ 2, 8
to 11.

Tax matters, services in connection with, as practice of law, 9 A.L.R.2d 797.

Land contracts: drafting, or filling in blanks in printed forms, of instruments relating to
land by real estate agents, brokers, or managers as constituting practice of law, 53
A.L.R.2d 788.

Trust company's acts as fiduciary as practice of law, 69 A.L.R.2d 404.

Title examination activities by lending institution, insurance company, or title and
abstract company, as illegal practice of law, 85 A.L.R.2d 184.

Compelling admission to membership in professional association or society, 89
A.L.R.2d 964.

Handling, preparing, presenting, or trying workmen's compensation claims or cases as
practice of law, 2 A.L.R.3d 724.

Practice by attorneys and physician as corporate entities or associations under
professional service corporations statutes, 4 A.L.R.3d 383.

Representation of another before state public utilities or service commission as
involving practice of law, 13 A.L.R.3d 812.

Activities of law clerks as illegal practice of law, 13 A.L.R.3d 1137.

Collection agency: operation of collection agency as unauthorized practice of law, 27
A.L.R.3d 1152.

Incapacity: validity and construction of rule or order requiring attorney to submit to
physical or mental examination to determine capacity to continue in practice of law, 52
A.L.R.3d 1326.
Books and forms: sale of books or forms designed to enable layman to achieve legal
results without assistance of attorney as unauthorized practice of law, 71 A.L.R.3d
1000.

Propriety of attorney's resignation from bar in light of pending or potential disciplinary
action, 54 A.L.R.4th 264.

Jury: who is lawyer or attorney disqualified or exempt from service, or subject to
challenge for cause, 57 A.L.R.4th 1260.

In-house counsel's right to maintain action for wrongful discharge, 16 A.L.R.5th 239.

Handling, preparing, presenting, or trying workers' compensation claims or cases as
practice of law, 58 A.L.R.5th 449.

Bar examination: validity, under federal constitution, of state bar examination
proceedings, 30 A.L.R. Fed. 934.

7 C.J.S. Attorney and Client §§ 3 to 6, 10 to 42, 59 to 87; 7A C.J.S. Attorney and Client
§§ 88 to 130.

36-2-2 to 36-2-9. Repealed.
                                      ANNOTATIONS

Repeals. — Laws 1979, ch. 143, § 2, repealed 36-2-2 to 36-2-9 NMSA 1978, relating to
the board of commissioners of the state bar and the state board of bar examiners. For
present provisions, see 36-2-9.1 NMSA 1978.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1998–2016 · leading case: State v. Torres, 2012 NMSC 16 (N.M. 2012).
State v. Torres, 2012 NMSC 16 (N.M. 2012). · cites it 3× “See NMSA 1978, § 36-2-1 (1941) (codifying the Supreme Court’s authority to define and regulate the practice of law); see also Bell v.”
Roy D. Mercer, LLC v. Reynolds, 2013 NMSC 2 (N.M. 2012). · cites it 2× “Rule 16-110(C) was amended in 2008. It is this Court’s responsibility to interpret and apply the Rules of Professional Conduct that govern the legal profession.”
Kline v. Tiedemann (In Re Kline), 424 B.R. 516 (Bankr. D.N.M. 2010). · cites it 2× “Kline’s claim of violation of NMSA § 36-2-1 in conduct occurring during the appeals process arising after the Magistrate Court Action does not fall under the auspices of the court’s post-dismissal jurisdiction.”
In Re Treinen, 131 P.3d 1282 (N.M. 2006). · cites it 2× “See NMSA 1978, § 36-2-1 (1941) (codifying the Supreme Court’s constitutional authority to define and regulate practice of law); State ex rel.”
State v. Begay, 2016 NMCA 039 (N.M. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 4× “But some misdemeanors could instead be tried by “magistrates[,j” also known as “justices of the peace[,]” NMSA 1953, §§ 36-2-1, -5 (1961) (providing magistrates/justices of the peace jurisdiction over misdemeanors punishable by a maximum fine of $100 or six months imprisonment),…”
Kline v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. (In Re Kline), 420 B.R. 541 (Bankr. D.N.M. 2009). · cites it 2× “Kline’s claim of violation of NMSA § 36-2-1 in the conduct of the state court foreclosure proceeding does not fall under the auspices of the court’s post-dismissal jurisdiction.”
Trambley v. Wyman, 1998 NMCA 035 (N.M. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “In contrast, the title of the act that enacted Section 36-2-13.1 is “an act relating to court actions; providing for attorney liability for court reporter services.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.