New Mexico Statutes
N.M. Stat. § 39-3-1 (2026)
1 NMSA 1978.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NM-LEGnmonesource.com
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
History: 1953 Comp., § 14-2-4, enacted by Laws 1965, ch. 300; 1981, ch. 205, § 1; 1985, ch. 208, § 3; 1998, ch. 55, § 3; 1999, ch. 265, § 3; 2013, ch. 120, § 3; 2018, ch. 79, § 44; 2021, ch. 112, § 2. ANNOTATIONS Cross references. — For procedures governing administrative appeals to the district court, see Rule 1-074 NMRA. The 2021 amendment, effective June 18, 2021, removed provisions requiring a census in the territory proposed to be incorporated, and required the board of county commissioners to accept the data provided by the university of New Mexico geospatial and population studies group regarding whether the territory proposed to be incorporated contains the necessary population density upon a determination that the territory proposed to be incorporated is within the urbanized area of another municipality and in compliance Section 3-2-3 NMSA 1978; in the section heading, after "petition to act", deleted "census" and added "population data"; in Subsection A, after "revenue plan", deleted "and the amount of money sufficient to pay the cost of a census"; in Subsection B, Paragraph B(2), after "county commissioners shall", deleted "cause a census to be taken of the persons residing within the territory proposed to be incorporated" and added "accept the data provided by the university of New Mexico geospatial and population studies group regarding whether or not the territory proposed to be incorporated contains a population density of not less than one person per acre"; deleted former Subsection C and redesignated former Subsections D through G as Subsections C through F, respectively; in Subsection C, after "after the date the", deleted "results of the census" and added "university of New Mexico geospatial and population studies group data"; and in Subsection D, after "Based on the", deleted "census results" and added "university of New Mexico geospatial and population studies group data". The 2018 amendment, effective July 1, 2018, provided certain requirements regarding when special elections for the incorporation of a territory as a municipality may be held, and provided that such elections shall be held pursuant to the provisions of the Local Election Act; and in Subsection F, added "Special" preceding "elections" in the second sentence, after "shall be held in", added "June or July in", after "odd-numbered years", deleted "on the first Tuesday in July or in any year on the first Tuesday in January, unless that Tuesday is a holiday, in which case the election shall be held on the second Tuesday in July or the second Tuesday in January" and added "or July or August in even-numbered years and shall be held pursuant to the provisions of the Local Election Act". The 2013 amendment, effective June 14, 2013, required that petitioners present a municipal services and revenue plan that demonstrates that the services will be provided and how the services will be paid for; required the board of county commissioners to consider the municipal incorporation review team’s report; in Subsection A, in the introductory sentence, after "accompanying map or plat", added "the municipal services and revenue plan", after "Section 3-1-5 NMSA 1978" added "shall determine", and after "filing of the petition", deleted "determine"; in Subsection D, after "the results of the census", added "and the municipal incorporation review team’s report"; and in Subsection E, at the beginning of the sentence, added "Based on the census results and the municipal incorporation review team’s report". The 1999 amendment, effective July 1, 1999, substituted "Section 39-3-1.1" for "Section 12-8A-1" in Subsection F. The 1998 amendment, effective September 1, 1998, in Subsection A, substituted "has" for "have" and inserted "Section"; in Paragraph A(1), deleted "registered" preceding "qualified"; in Paragraph A(2), substituted "schedules" for "rolls" and "are" for "is"; in Paragraph B(2), deleted "that the conditions for incorporation of a municipality", substituted "and in compliance with" for "as established in", and deleted "have been met" following "1978"; deleted "the board of county commissioners" in Subsection C; substituted "determination" for "determinations" in Subsection D; substituted "municipalities" for "municipalties" in Subsection E; in Subsection F, substituted "a" for "any" and inserted "pursuant to the provisions of Section 12-8A-1 NMSA 1978"; and made minor stylistic changes. Incorporation of urbanized territory. — Where the provisional government of Santa Teresa (Santa Teresa), a New Mexico non-profit corporation consisting of owners of land in the Santa Teresa area in Doña Ana county, sought to incorporate the area as a municipality, separate from neighboring city of Sunland Park (Sunland Park), the district court erred in affirming the Doña Ana board of county commissioners’ denial of Santa Teresa’s petition to incorporate based on a determination that 3-2-3(B)(3) NMSA 1978 required Santa Teresa to first submit a formal petition asking Sunland Park to annex the subject territory, because 3-2-3(B)(3) NMSA 1978 does not require residents of a territory to first formally petition the existing municipality to annex the territory before they can file a petition to incorporate as a municipality; such residents may file an incorporation petition pursuant to 3-2-1 NMSA 1978 and 3-2-5 NMSA 1978 if the municipality informally proposes to consider or otherwise expresses an interest in annexing the territory, short of actually initiating formal annexation proceedings. Provisional Gov’t of Santa Teresa v. Doña Ana Cnty. Bd. of Comm’rs, 2018-NMCA-070, cert. granted. Common-law dedication permitted. — A common-law dedication may still be effectively made, as the prescribed statutory method of doing so is not exclusive, so that an oral acceptance by the county commissioners plus public enjoyment of the property for 10 years or more satisfies the requirements of a common-law dedication. 1947 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 47-5024. Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations § 25.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 35
cases (9 in the last 5 years), 1982–2024 · leading case: Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock, 2013 NMSC 040 (N.M. 2013).
Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock, 2013 NMSC 040 (N.M. 2013). “See NMSA 1978, § 39-3-1 (1955) (“All appeals from inferior tribunals to the district courts shall be tried anew in said courts on their merits, as if no trial had been had below, except as otherwise provided by law.”
State v. Ball, 718 P.2d 686 (N.M. 1986). “VI, Section 27. The alternate holding of the Court of Appeals in Bazan presents the most thorough examination of the issue.”
State v. Heinsen, 2005 NMSC 035 (N.M. 2005). “VI, § 27; NMSA 1978, § 39-3-1 (1955); Rule 6-703(J).”
State v. Heinsen, 2004 NMCA 110 (N.M. Ct. App. 2004). “This constitutional right to appeal is recognized in NMSA 1978, § 39-3-1 (1955), and provides that “[a]ll appeals from inferior tribunals to the district courts shall be tried anew in said courts on their merits, as if no trial had been had below, except as otherwise provided by…”
State v. Cruz, 2021 NMSC 015 (N.M. 2021). “The only rule with which the Defendant had failed to comply, according to the district court’s order, was the long-since abolished “six-month rule.” As set forth above, that was error.”
State v. Cruz, 486 P.3d 1 (N.M. 2021). “NMSA 1978, Section 39-3-1 (1955), provides that “[a]ll appeals from inferior tribunals to the district courts shall be tried anew .”
Green v. Kase, 823 P.2d 318 (N.M. 1992). “” NMSA 1978, § 39-3-1 (Repl.Pamp.1991). The text of that Section states that such action shall be "tried anew in said courts on their merits, as if no trial had been had below.”
State v. Foster, 75 P.3d 824 (N.M. Ct. App. 2003). “Under state statute, “[a]ll appeals from inferior tribunals to the district courts shall be tried anew in said courts on their merits, as if no trial had been had below, except as otherwise provided by law.”
Hyden v. New Mexico Human Servs. Dep't, 993 P.2d 740 (N.M. Ct. App. 1999). “” Section 39-3-1 .1(G). Although the effective date of such legislation was September 1, 1998, see 1998 N.”
State v. Lope, 2015 NMCA 011 (N.M. Ct. App. 2014). “The appeal to the district court was de novo, NMSA 1978, Section 39-3-1 (1955), and on June 16, 2009, an evidentiary hearing was held on the motion to suppress, the only issue raised on appeal.”
State v. Verret, 2019 NMCA 10 (N.M. Ct. App. 2018). “; see NMSA 1978, § 39-3-1 (1955) (“All appeals from inferior tribunals to the district courts shall be tried anew in said courts on their merits, as if no trial had been had below, except as otherwise provided by law.”
State v. Begay, 241 P.3d 1125 (N.M. Ct. App. 2010). “”); NMSA 1978, § 39-3-1 (1955) (“All appeals from inferior tribunals to the district courts shall be tried anew in said courts on their merits, as if no trial had been had below, except as otherwise provided by law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.