New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 40-1-9 (2026)

Prohibited marriages.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
No marriage between relatives within the prohibited degrees or between or with
persons under the prohibited ages shall be declared void except by a decree of the
district court upon proper proceedings. A cause of action may be instituted by the minor,
by next friend, by either parent or legal guardian of the minor or by the district attorney.
In the case of minors, no party to the marriage who may be over the prohibited age shall
be allowed to apply for or obtain a decree of the court declaring the marriage void; but
the minor may do so, and the court may, in its discretion, grant alimony until the minor
becomes of age or remarries. If the parties should live together until they arrive at the
age under which marriage is permitted by statute, then the marriage shall be deemed
legal and binding.

History: Laws 1876, ch. 32, § 1; C.L. 1884, § 997; C.L. 1897, § 1430; Code 1915, §
3434; Laws 1927, ch. 110, § 1; C.S. 1929, § 87-110; 1941 Comp., § 65-109; 1953
Comp., § 57-1-9; Laws 1973, ch. 51, § 2; 2013, ch. 144, § 6.

                                     ANNOTATIONS

The 2013 amendment, effective June 14, 2013, eliminated annulment; in the title,
deleted "annulment"; after "or between or with", deleted "infants" and added "persons";
deleted the former fourth sentence, which provided that children of a void marriage are
legitimate with the right of inheritance from both parents; and in the current fourth
sentence, after "under which marriage is", deleted "prohibited" and added "permitted".

Penal provision not repealed by this section. — Penal provision of 40-1-8 NMSA
1978, directed against the uniting of persons under age in marriage, was not repealed
by this section, enacted by same legislature, providing that such marriages should be
declared void only by court decree. Territory v. Harwood, 1910-NMSC-029, 15 N.M.
424, 110 P. 556, 29 L.R.A. (n.s.) 504.

Prohibited marriages to be declared void by court. — When the legislature provided
in this section (before its amendment) that the marriages prohibited by 40-1-6 NMSA
1978 (before its amendment) and 40-1-7 NMSA 1978 should be declared void by court
decree, it left them none the less contrary to law and none the less among those
"declared invalid" by the preceding act. The effect was to render less harsh the
operation of the statute upon the participants in such illegal marriage and their possible
and innocent offspring. Territory v. Harwood, 1910-NMSC-029, 15 N.M. 424, 110 P.
556, 29 L.R.A. (n.s.) 504.

Applicability to alimony where bigamous marriage admitted. — This act applies to
no invalid or void marriages other than those enumerated, and cannot be grounds of
alimony where a bigamous marriage is in effect admitted. Prince v. Freeman, 1941-
NMSC-006, 45 N.M. 143, 112 P.2d 821.

Presumption as to validity of later marriage. — In dual marriage situations, where
validity of second marriage is attacked on the basis of the first being a subsisting
relationship at the time the second was contracted, the presumption of validity attaches
to the second marriage. Panzer v. Panzer, 1974-NMSC-092, 87 N.M. 29, 528 P.2d 888.

To overcome presumption of validity which attaches to later marriage proof is
required of the prior marriage plus the fact that it has not been terminated by death or
divorce. Panzer v. Panzer, 1974-NMSC-092, 87 N.M. 29, 528 P.2d 888.

Law reviews. — For article, "Annulment of Marriages in New Mexico," see 1 Nat.
Resources J. 146 (1961).

For article, "Annulment of Marriages in New Mexico: Part II - Proposed Statute," see 2
Nat. Resources J. 270 (1962).

For symposium, "Equal Rights in Divorce and Separation," see 3 N.M.L. Rev. 118
(1973).

Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 4 Am. Jur. 2d Annulment of Marriage §
1; 52 Am. Jur. 2d Marriage §§ 6, 72 to 77, 148, 149.

Misrepresentation or mistake as to identity or condition in life of one of the parties as
affecting validity of marriage, 50 A.L.R.3d 1295.

Mental capacity to marry, 57 A.L.R.2d 1250, 82 A.L.R.2d 1040.

Effect of intoxication on mental capacity to marry, 57 A.L.R.2d 1250, 82 A.L.R.2d 1040.

Effect of annulment of marriage and rights arising out of acts or transactions between
parties prior thereto, 2 A.L.R.2d 637.

Avoidance of procreation of children as ground for annulment, 4 A.L.R.2d 227.

Cohabitation of persons ceremonially married after learning of facts negativing
dissolution of previous marriage of one, as affecting right to annulment, 4 A.L.R.2d 542.
Validity of marriage as affected by intention of the parties that it should be only a matter
of form or jest, 14 A.L.R.2d 624.

Antenuptial knowledge relating to alleged grounds as barring right to annulment, 15
A.L.R.2d 706.

What constitutes duress sufficient to warrant annulment of marriage, 16 A.L.R.2d 1430.

Racial, religious or political differences as ground for annulment, 25 A.L.R.2d 928.

Refusal of sexual intercourse as fraud sufficient for annulment, 28 A.L.R.2d 499.

Rights and remedies in respect of property accumulated by man and woman living
together in illicit relations or under void marriage, 31 A.L.R.2d 1255.

Applicability, to annulment actions, of residence requirements of divorce statutes, 32
A.L.R.2d 734.

Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act of 1940, as amended, as affecting matrimonial
actions, 54 A.L.R.2d 390.

Right to allowance of permanent alimony in connection with decree of annulment, 54
A.L.R.2d 1410.

Court's power as to custody and support of children in annulment proceedings, 63
A.L.R.2d 1008.

Concealment of unchastity prior to marriage, as ground for annulment of marriage, 64
A.L.R.2d 742.

Determination of paternity, legitimacy or legitimation of children in action for annulment,
65 A.L.R.2d 1381.

Mental health of contesting parent as factor in award of child custody in annulment
proceeding, 74 A.L.R.2d 1073.

Determination of property rights in wedding presents in action for annulment, 75
A.L.R.2d 1365.

Concealment of or misrepresentation as to previous marriage or divorce as ground for
annulment of marriage, 15 A.L.R.3d 759.

Incapacity for sexual intercourse as ground for annulment, 52 A.L.R.3d 589.

Annulment as affecting will previously executed by husband or wife, 71 A.L.R.3d 1297.
Right to allowance of permanent alimony in connection with decree of annulment, 81
A.L.R.3d 281.

Recovery for services rendered by persons living in apparent relation of husband and
wife without express agreement for compensation, 94 A.L.R.3d 552.

Homosexuality, transvestism, and similar sexual practices as grounds for annulment of
marriage, 68 A.L.R.4th 1069.

Excessiveness of adequacy of attorneys' fees in domestic relations cases, 17 A.L.R.5th
366.

Sexual intercourse between persons related by half blood as incest, 34 A.L.R.5th 723.

Mental health of contesting parent as factor in award of child custody, 53 A.L.R.5th 375.

55 C.J.S. Marriage §§ 35, 36.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2023 · leading case: State v. Martinez, 781 P.2d 306 (N.M. Ct. App. 1989).
State v. Martinez, 781 P.2d 306 (N.M. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 4× “Laws, Chapter, 53, entitled, "An Act Defining an Accessory After the Fact" which was compiled as NMSA 1953, Section 40-1-9. The 1949 enactment "defined such accessories in words similar to what now appears as § 30-22-4.”
State v. Mobbley, 650 P.2d 841 (N.M. Ct. App. 1982). “53, originally compiled as § 40-1-9, N.M.S.A. 1953 Comp. (Original Vol).”
Rios v. Rios (N.M. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “{10} We begin by noting that, while bigamy is not an expressly prohibited form of marriage by statute, see NMSA 1978, § 40-1-9 (2013) (prohibiting only incestuous marriages and unions with minors), it is a criminal offense under NMSA 1978, Section 30-10-1 (1963).”
State v. Mobbley, 650 P.2d 841 (N.M. Ct. App. 1982). “53, originally compiled as § 40-1-9, N.M.S.A. 1953 Comp. (Original Vol.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.