New Mexico Statutes
N.M. Stat. § 45-3-203 (2026)
Priority among persons seeking appointment as personal
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NM-LEGnmonesource.com
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
representative.
A. Whether the proceedings are formal or informal, persons who are not disqualified
have priority for appointment in the following order:
(1) the person with priority as determined by a probated will, including a
person nominated by a power conferred in a will;
(2) the surviving spouse of the decedent who is a devisee of the decedent;
(3) other devisees of the decedent;
(4) the surviving spouse of the decedent;
(5) other heirs of the decedent; and
(6) forty-five days after the death of the decedent, any creditor.
B. An objection to an appointment may be made only in formal proceedings. In case
of objection, the priorities stated in Subsection A of this section apply except that:
(1) if the estate appears to be more than adequate to meet allowances and
costs of administration but inadequate to discharge anticipated unsecured claims, the
court, on petition of creditors, may appoint any qualified person; and
(2) in case of objection to appointment of a person other than one whose
priority is determined by will by an heir or devisee appearing to have a substantial
interest in the estate, the court may appoint a person who is acceptable to heirs and
devisees whose interests in the estate appear to be worth in total more than half of the
probable distributable value of the estate or, in default of this accord, any suitable
person.
C. A person entitled to letters under Paragraphs (2) through (5) of Subsection A of
this section or a person who has not reached the age of majority and who would be
entitled to letters but for the person's age may nominate a qualified person to act as
personal representative by an appropriate writing filed with the court and thereby confer
the person's relative priority for appointment on the person's nominee. Any person who
has reached the age of majority may renounce the right to nominate or to an
appointment by an appropriate writing filed with the court. When two or more persons
entitled to letters under Paragraphs (2) through (5) of Subsection A of this section share
a priority, all those who do not renounce must concur in nominating another to act for
them or in applying for appointment by an appropriate writing filed with the court. The
person so nominated shall have the same priority as those who nominated the person.
A nomination or renunciation shall be signed by each person making it, the person's
attorney or the person's representative authorized by Subsection D of this section.
D. Conservators of the estates of protected persons or, if there is no conservator,
any guardian except a guardian ad litem of a minor or incapacitated person may
exercise the same right to nominate, to object to another's appointment or to participate
in determining the preference of a majority in interest of the heirs and devisees that the
protected person would have if qualified for appointment.
E. Appointment of one who does not have priority, including priority resulting from
renunciation or nomination determined pursuant to this section, may be made only in
formal proceedings. Before appointing one without priority, the court shall determine
that those having priority, although given notice of the proceedings, have failed to
request appointment or to nominate another for appointment and that administration is
necessary.
F. No person is qualified to serve as a personal representative who is:
(1) under the age of majority; or
(2) a person whom the court finds unsuitable in formal proceedings.
G. A personal representative appointed by a court of the decedent's domicile has
priority over all other persons except where the decedent's will nominates different
persons to be personal representatives in New Mexico and in the state of domicile. The
domiciliary personal representative may nominate another, who shall have the same
priority as the domiciliary personal representative.
H. This section governs priority for appointment of a successor personal
representative but does not apply to the selection of a special administrator.
History: 1953 Comp., § 32A-3-203, enacted by Laws 1975, ch. 257, § 3-203; 2009, ch.
159, § 25; 2011, ch. 124, § 44; 2017, ch. 41, § 16.
ANNOTATIONS
Cross references. — For priority for appointment as a special administrator, see 45-3-
615 NMSA 1978.
For appointment of administrator on application of revenue division of department of
taxation and revenue, see 7-7-9 NMSA 1978.
For age of majority, see 12-2A-3 and 28-6-1 NMSA 1978.
The 2017 amendment, effective January 1, 2018, included creditors in the priority list
for persons seeking appointment as personal representative; in Subsection A,
Paragraph A(6), deleted "on application or petition of an interested person other than a
spouse, devisee or heir, any qualified person" and added "forty-five days after the death
of the decedent, any creditor"; in Subsection C, in the first sentence, after "majority and
who", deleted "might" and added "would", and in the third sentence, after "do not
renounce", deleted "shall" and added "must"; in Subsection E, deleted "highest"
preceding each occurrence of "priority" throughout the subsection; and in Subsection F,
deleted Paragraph (F(3).
The 2011 amendment, effective January 1, 2012, in Subsection C, required that the
nomination of a personal representative be in writing and filed with the court; provided
that the person nominated has the same priority as those who nominated the person;
and required that a nomination or renunciation be signed by each person making it and
by their attorney or representative.
The 2009 amendment, effective June 19, 2009, in Subsection D, after "devisees that
the protected person", deleted "ward".
De facto spouse under Australian law was not a marriage. — Where an Australian
court determined that petitioner was the de facto spouse of the decedent under the
Australian property relationships law based on the facts that petitioner and decedent
had a twenty-year relationship, lived together openly and publicly, and were involved in
each other’s business and economic affairs; the Australian property relationships law
conferred the same succession rights on de facto spouses as it conferred on spouses in
marriage; the Australian court expressly stated that the Australian property relationships
law did not create a marriage; petitioner and the decedent were not married to each
other; and the de facto spouse status conferred by the Australian property relations law
was distinct from the status of marriage under both the Australian marriage law and the
Australian family law; and the de facto relationship was not a common-law marriage, the
de facto spouse relationship under the Australian property relationships law was not a
marital relationship under New Mexico law. Dion v. Rieser, 2012-NMCA-071, 283 P.3d
871, cert. denied, 2012-NMCERT-006.
Surviving spouse’s preference. — In adjudicating a petition for formal appointment of
the decedent’s child as personal representative, the trial court correctly appointed the
decedent’s spouse, who had been appointed informally, as personal representative
because the spouse had priority as surviving spouse of the decedent under 45-3-
203A(4) NMSA 1978. In re Estate of Lopez, 1987-NMCA-087, 106 N.M. 157, 740 P.2d
707.
Sole surviving parent. — The father of a child, as the child’s sole surviving parent, was
entitled to priority in appointment as the personal representative of the child’s estate,
where his paternity had been adjudicated, his attempts to have a paternal relationship
with the child were thwarted by the natural mother, and the other applicants were the
deceased mother’s half-brother and mother. In re Estate of Sumler, 2003-NMCA-030,
133 N.M. 319, 62 P.3d 776.
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 31 Am. Jur. 2d Executors and
Administrators §§ 162 to 194.
Selection of administrator from among members of class equally entitled, 1 A.L.R. 1245.
Status and acts of one appointed executor or administrator who was ineligible, 14
A.L.R. 619.
Separation agreement as affecting right of husband or wife to administer deceased
spouse's estate, 35 A.L.R. 1511, 34 A.L.R.2d 1020.
Deferred class of next of kin named in statute, but not beneficially interested in
particular estate, preference respecting appointment in favor of person in, 70 A.L.R.
1466.
Stranger, right to pass over eligible person interested in estate and appoint, 80 A.L.R.
824.
Power of court to refuse letters testamentary to one named in will as executor in
absence of specific statutory disqualification, 95 A.L.R. 828.
Consul's right to appointment as administrator, 100 A.L.R. 1527.
Statute authorizing appointment of trust company as administrator, upon application or
consent of one acting as such (or executor), or one entitled to appointment as such, 105
A.L.R. 1190.
Time and manner of taking advantage in action commenced or continued by foreign
executor or administrator of his failure to qualify in state, 108 A.L.R. 1282.
Choice in appointment of administrator as between nominee of one in higher order of
statutory preference and one in lower order of preference, 113 A.L.R. 780.
Premature granting of letters testamentary or of administration as affecting acts or
proceedings thereunder, 113 A.L.R. 1398.
Grantees of, or successors to, interest of one eligible because of specified relationship
to deceased, who are within statute making such persons eligible to appointment, 114
A.L.R. 275.
Appointment as administrator of one not a member, nor nominee of a member, of the
class of persons designated by statute as eligible to appointment, where no one in
better right has applied, 119 A.L.R. 143.
Contract in consideration of renunciation of one's status, or right to appointment, as
guardian, executor, administrator, trustee or other fiduciary, as contrary to public policy,
121 A.L.R. 677.
Creditor's or debtor's right to attack issuance of letters of administration, 123 A.L.R.
1225.
Brevity of period after death of decedent as affecting propriety of grant of letters
testamentary or of administration, 133 A.L.R. 1483.
Guardian of infant or incompetent, right to appointment as executor or administrator as
representative or substitute for infant or incompetent, 135 A.L.R. 585.
Special or temporary administrator, person to be appointed as, pending will contest, 136
A.L.R. 604.
Administration of estate of one the fact of whose death rests upon presumption or
circumstantial evidence, 140 A.L.R. 1403.
Waiver on renunciation of right to administer decedent's estate, scope and effect, 153
A.L.R. 220.
Executor de son tort, propriety of appointment as executor or administrator, 157 A.L.R.
237.
Right of minor next of kin to apply through next friend for appointment of administrator,
161 A.L.R. 1389.
Construction and application of statutes relating specifically to preferences in
appointment as administrator with the will annexed, 164 A.L.R. 844.
Governing law as to existence or character of offense for which one has been convicted
in a federal court or court of another state, as bearing upon disqualification as executor
or administrator, 175 A.L.R. 806.
Effect of divorce, separation, desertion, unfaithfulness and the like, upon right to name
appointee for administration of estate of spouse, 34 A.L.R.2d 876.
Right of appeal from order on application for removal of personal representative,
guardian or trustee, 37 A.L.R.2d 751.
Delay in presenting will for probate or in seeking letters testamentary, loss of right to be
appointed executor by, 45 A.L.R.2d 916.
Powers and duties of a public administrator, 56 A.L.R.2d 1183.
Right of surviving spouse, personally incompetent to serve as administrator because of
being younger than age specified, to nominate administrator, 64 A.L.R.2d 1152.
Construction and effect of statutory provision that no person is competent to act as
executor or administrator whom court finds incompetent by reason of want of integrity,
73 A.L.R.2d 458.
Public administrators and others, priority, as regards right to appointment, as between,
99 A.L.R.2d 1063.
Capacity of infant to act as executor or administrator, and effect of improper
appointment, 8 A.L.R.3d 590.
Foreign corporation, eligibility to appointment as executor, administrator or testamentary
trustee, 26 A.L.R.3d 1019.
Physical condition as affecting competency to act as executor or administrator, 71
A.L.R.3d 675.
Who is resident within meaning of statute prohibiting appointment of nonresident
executor or administrator, 9 A.L.R.4th 1223.
33 C.J.S. Executors and Administrators §§ 31, 33.Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case: Oldham v. Oldham, 247 P.3d 736 (N.M. 2011).
Oldham v. Oldham, 247 P.3d 736 (N.M. 2011). “Subsection B, upon which Son relies, provides a definition of “surviving spouse” that applies only “[f]or purposes of Chapter 45, Article 2, Parts 1 through 4 and Section 45-3-203.”
In re the Est. of Sumler, 2003 NMCA 030 (N.M. Ct. App. 2002). “Therefore, the Court should not appoint a personal representative of the Estate under NMSA 1978 § 45-3-203 who is not a proper personal representative and statutory beneficiary under NMSA 1978 § 41-2-3, as there are no known assets in Decedent’s estate to be administered.”
Oldham v. Oldham, 222 P.3d 701 (N.M. Ct. App. 2009). “{8} Wife counters that regardless of the pending divorce proceedings, the district court was correct in appointing her as personal representative of Husband’s estate pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 45-3-203(A)(l) (1975). Section 45-3-203(A)(l) provides that “a person nominated by…”
Griego v. Oliver, 2014 NMSC 003 (N.M. 2013). “See NMSA 1978, § 45-2-807(a) (1975, as amended through 1993) (one-half of the community property goes to the surviving spouse); NMSA 1978, § 45-3-203(A)(2) (1975, as amended through 2011) (granting priority of the appointment as personal representative to the surviving spouse if…”
In Re Est. of Baca, 984 P.2d 782 (N.M. Ct. App. 1999). “But if otherwise qualified, see § 45-3-601, interested persons can petition to have themselves appointed personal representative, see § 45-3-203(A)(6). "`[I]nterested person[s]' include[ ] heirs, devisees, children, spouses, creditors, beneficiaries and any others having a…”
Peralta v. Peralta, 131 P.3d 81 (N.M. Ct. App. 2005). “{20} Citing to NMSA 1978, § 45-3-203 (1975), Defendants argue that Nora could only proceed in a probate proceeding because the Probate Code grants Nora standing to bring an action concerning the estate of her mother, Helen.”
MacIas v. Jaramillo, 11 P.3d 153 (N.M. Ct. App. 2000). “See NMSA 1978, § 45-3-203(F)(3) (1975). {28} It is apparent from his conversation with Plaintiffs attorney that James knew why Plaintiff wanted to know the name of the personal representative.”
Matter of Est. of Seymour, 600 P.2d 274 (N.M. 1979). “§ 45-3-203(A)(1), N.M.S.A. 1978; Matter of Estate of Gardner, supra .”
Trujillo v. Lopez, 740 P.2d 707 (N.M. Ct. App. 1987). “See NMSA 1978, § 45-3-203(A)(4). Since Lopez had already been properly appointed and her appointment had not been terminated, it was not necessary to reappoint her.”
Dion v. Rieser, 2012 NMCA 070 (N.M. Ct. App. 2012). “Nevertheless, the nature of that relationship was not marital under New Mexico law. {29} In sum, we are not persuaded by argument or authority, for the purposes of determining whether Ms.”
Blumenshine v. Kastler (N.M. Ct. App. 2016). “See id. In any event, Section 45-3-203 does not apply to Pearson 10 because she does not fall into the category of persons that would have priority under 11 the UPC.”
Griego v. Oliver, 2014 NMSC 3 (N.M. 2013). “See NMSA 1978, § 45- 2-807(a) (1975, as amended through 1993) (one-half of the community property goes to the surviving spouse); NMSA 1978, § 45-3-203(A)(2) (1975, as amended through 2011) (granting priority of the appointment as personal representative to the surviving spouse…”
— N.M. Stat. § 45-3-203(A) — 3 cases
Dion v. Rieser, 2012 NMCA 070 (N.M. Ct. App. 2012). “Nevertheless, the nature of that relationship was not marital under New Mexico law. {29} In sum, we are not persuaded by argument or authority, for the purposes of determining whether Ms.”
Dion v. Rieser, 2012 NMCA 70 (N.M. Ct. App. 2012).
Blumenshine v. Kastler (N.M. Ct. App. 2016). “See id. In any event, Section 45-3-203 does not apply to Pearson 10 because she does not fall into the category of persons that would have priority under 11 the UPC.”
— N.M. Stat. § 45-3-203(A)(1) — 1 case
Matter of Est. of Seymour, 600 P.2d 274 (N.M. 1979). “§ 45-3-203(A)(1), N.M.S.A. 1978; Matter of Estate of Gardner, supra .”
— N.M. Stat. § 45-3-203(A)(2) — 2 cases
Griego v. Oliver, 2014 NMSC 003 (N.M. 2013). “See NMSA 1978, § 45-2-807(a) (1975, as amended through 1993) (one-half of the community property goes to the surviving spouse); NMSA 1978, § 45-3-203(A)(2) (1975, as amended through 2011) (granting priority of the appointment as personal representative to the surviving spouse if…”
Griego v. Oliver, 2014 NMSC 3 (N.M. 2013). “See NMSA 1978, § 45- 2-807(a) (1975, as amended through 1993) (one-half of the community property goes to the surviving spouse); NMSA 1978, § 45-3-203(A)(2) (1975, as amended through 2011) (granting priority of the appointment as personal representative to the surviving spouse…”
— N.M. Stat. § 45-3-203(A)(4) — 1 case
Trujillo v. Lopez, 740 P.2d 707 (N.M. Ct. App. 1987). “See NMSA 1978, § 45-3-203(A)(4). Since Lopez had already been properly appointed and her appointment had not been terminated, it was not necessary to reappoint her.”
— N.M. Stat. § 45-3-203(A)(6) — 2 cases
In Re Est. of Baca, 984 P.2d 782 (N.M. Ct. App. 1999). “But if otherwise qualified, see § 45-3-601, interested persons can petition to have themselves appointed personal representative, see § 45-3-203(A)(6). "`[I]nterested person[s]' include[ ] heirs, devisees, children, spouses, creditors, beneficiaries and any others having a…”
BOKF, N.A. v. Pacheco (N.M. 2025).
— N.M. Stat. § 45-3-203(A)(l) — 1 case
Oldham v. Oldham, 222 P.3d 701 (N.M. Ct. App. 2009). “{8} Wife counters that regardless of the pending divorce proceedings, the district court was correct in appointing her as personal representative of Husband’s estate pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 45-3-203(A)(l) (1975). Section 45-3-203(A)(l) provides that “a person nominated by…”
— N.M. Stat. § 45-3-203(F)(2) — 1 case
Oldham v. Oldham, 247 P.3d 736 (N.M. 2011). “Subsection B, upon which Son relies, provides a definition of “surviving spouse” that applies only “[f]or purposes of Chapter 45, Article 2, Parts 1 through 4 and Section 45-3-203.”
— N.M. Stat. § 45-3-203(F)(3) — 1 case
MacIas v. Jaramillo, 11 P.3d 153 (N.M. Ct. App. 2000). “See NMSA 1978, § 45-3-203(F)(3) (1975). {28} It is apparent from his conversation with Plaintiffs attorney that James knew why Plaintiff wanted to know the name of the personal representative.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.