New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 47-8-45 (2026)

Legal or equitable defense

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

On or before the day fixed for his appearance, the defendant may appear and answer and assert any legal or equitable defense, setoff or counterclaim.

History: 1953 Comp., § 70-7-45, enacted by Laws 1975, ch. 38, § 45.

ANNOTATIONS

Eviction subject to equitable defenses. — A court may find that a qualified indigent tenant of public housing need not be evicted solely because adjudged liable for back rent. Equitable principles may be applied to prevent eviction. City of Albuquerque v. Brooks, 1992-NMSC-069, 114 N.M. 572, 844 P.2d 822.

Law reviews. — For survey, "The Uniform Owner-Resident Relations Act," see 6 N.M.L. Rev. 293 (1976).

Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — Rights and remedies of tenant upon landlord's breach of covenant to repair, 28 A.L.R.2d 446.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1992–2021 · leading case: City of Albuquerque v. Brooks, 844 P.2d 822 (N.M. 1992).
City of Albuquerque v. Brooks, 844 P.2d 822 (N.M. 1992). · cites it 4× “See Section 47-8-45. Further, because this case involves a public housing tenancy, federal regulations impose a “good cause” requirement upon local authorities before termination of a tenancy.”
White v. Farris, 2021 NMCA 014 (N.M. Ct. App. 2021). “{51} Assuming for the sake of argument that the analyses set forth in Buckingham and Huckins would apply if Plaintiff had retained the $10,000 payment, see generally § 47-8-45 (providing that a defendant “may .”
Carol Rickert & Assocs. v. Law, 54 P.3d 91 (N.M. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “See NMSA 1978, § 47-8-45 (1975) (stating that in response to petition for restitution, tenant may “assert any legal or equitable defense, setoff or counterclaim”).”
L Fernandez v. C Council (N.M. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “14 Section 47-8-45; see also City of Albuquerque v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.