New Mexico Statutes
N.M. Stat. § 52-1-48 (2026)
Additional limitation on benefits.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NM-LEGnmonesource.com
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The benefits that the worker shall receive during the entire period of disability and
the benefits for death shall be based on and limited to the benefits in effect on the date
of the accidental injury resulting in the disability or death.
History: 1953 Comp., § 59-10-18.9, enacted by Laws 1975, ch. 284, § 13; 1989, ch.
263, § 28.
ANNOTATIONS
No due process right to greater disability benefits. — An injured worker does not
have a due process property right to disability benefits greater than those conferred by
the legislature. Casillas v. S.W.I.G., 1981-NMCA-045, 96 N.M. 84, 628 P.2d 329, cert.
denied, 96 N.M. 116, 628 P.2d 686, and appeal dismissed, 454 U.S. 934, 102 S. Ct.
467, 70 L. Ed. 2d 242 (1981).
Benefits begin at the time of disability. Lovato v. Duke City Lumber Co., 1982-
NMCA-021, 97 N.M. 545, 641 P.2d 1092, cert. denied, 98 N.M. 50, 644 P.2d 1039.
Benefit rate determined as of date of injury. — When benefits are wrongfully
terminated or reduced, the rate of compensation is to be determined to reflect the
average weekly wage as of the date of the injury resulting in disability, rather than as of
the date that the trial court determines disability. Varos v. Union Oil Co., 1984-NMCA-
091, 101 N.M. 713, 688 P.2d 31.
The trial court's award of compensation payments should reflect the amount of benefits
properly payable on the date of the workman's (worker's) accidental injury resulting in
disability, not the amount payable at the time of trial. Amos v. Gilbert W. Corp., 1985-
NMCA-106, 103 N.M. 631, 711 P.2d 908.
Disability begins when a compensable injury manifests itself and wage-earning
capacity is affected. Lovato v. Duke City Lumber Co., 1982-NMCA-021, 97 N.M. 545,
641 P.2d 1092, cert. denied, 98 N.M. 50, 644 P.2d 1039.
The date of disability is the date the workman (worker) knows or should know he has
suffered a compensable injury. Turner v. Shop-Rite Foods, Inc., 1982-NMCA-165, 99
N.M. 56, 653 P.2d 887.
No change in amount of compensation payable during disability. — The amount of
compensation to be paid for disability from the date the disability began does not
change during the period that disability continues; the maximum compensation payable
is limited to the benefits payable when the disability began, and continues for the full
period of that disability. Casias v. Zia Co., 1980-NMCA-109, 94 N.M. 723, 616 P.2d 436.
Attorney's fees. — There is no reason to distinguish an award of attorney's fees from
any other benefit to which a claimant is entitled, and the law in effect at the time of the
claimant's injury, rather than the law in effect at the time of the award of compensation
benefits, applies to the determination of the claimant's attorney's fees. Bateman v.
Springer Bldg. Materials Corp., 1989-NMCA-039, 108 N.M. 655, 777 P.2d 383, cert.
denied, 108 N.M. 681, 777 P.2d 1325.
Law reviews. — For article, "Survey of New Mexico Law, 1979-80: Workmen's
Compensation," see 11 N.M.L. Rev. 235 (1981).
For article, "Survey on New Mexico Law, 1982-83: Workmen's Compensation," see 14
N.M.L. Rev. 211 (1984).
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 82 Am. Jur. 2d Workers' Compensation
§ 388.Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1979–2021 · leading case: Varos v. Union Oil Co. of California, 688 P.2d 31 (N.M. Ct. App. 1984).
Varos v. Union Oil Co. of California, 688 P.2d 31 (N.M. Ct. App. 1984). “The trial court awarded plaintiff total permanent disability and, following the holding in Purcella, awarded compensation based on the average weekly wage as of the date that disability was judicially determined—1984. The sole issue on appeal is whether compensation benefits…”
Casias v. Zia Co., 596 P.2d 521 (N.M. Ct. App. 1979). “] Section 52-1-48 reads: *527 The benefits that a workman shall receive during the entire period of disability, and the benefits for death, shall be based on, and limited to, the benefits in effect on the date of the accidental injury resulting in the disability or death.”
Casias v. Zia Co., 616 P.2d 436 (N.M. Ct. App. 1980). “Section 52-1-48, N.M.S.A. 1978 states: The benefits that a workman shall receive during the entire period of disability .”
Amos v. Gilbert W. Corp., 711 P.2d 908 (N.M. Ct. App. 1985). “” The court in Varos found that to construe the applicable time as the date on which the trial court determines disability would nullify the statutory provision.”
Sanchez v. Molycorp, Inc., 703 P.2d 925 (N.M. Ct. App. 1985). “In Varos, the court held that the “holding in Purcella is contrary to the provisions of Section 52-1-48 * * * by adding an exception [to the Workmen’s Compensation Act] which in effect nullifies the statutory provision.”
Trujillo v. City of Albuquerque, 866 P.2d 368 (N.M. Ct. App. 1993). “Extent of Disability Claimant argues that the Judge erred in failing to find that he was permanently totally disabled, and that the Judge's finding that he was only 38% permanently partially disabled is not supported by substantial evidence under a whole-record standard of…”
Jeffrey v. Hays Plumbing & Heating, 878 P.2d 1009 (N.M. Ct. App. 1994). “See NMSA 1978, § 52-1-48 (Repl.Pamp.1991); Jojola v.”
Bateman v. Springer Bldg. Materials Corp., 777 P.2d 383 (N.M. Ct. App. 1989). “” NMSA 1978 § 52-1-48 (Orig.Pamp.). Cf. Amos v.”
Eberline Instrument Corp. v. Felix, 708 P.2d 334 (N.M. 1985). “They point to NMSA 1978, Section 52-1-48, which provides: The benefits that a workman shall receive during the entire period of disability, and the benefits for death, shall be based on, and limited to, the benefits in effect on the date of the accidental injury resulting in the…”
Levario v. Ysidro Villareal Labor Agency, 906 P.2d 266 (N.M. Ct. App. 1995). “See § 52-1-48. Under Sections 52-1-26 to 52-1-26.”
Lovato v. Duke City Lumber Co., 641 P.2d 1092 (N.M. Ct. App. 1982). “Section 52-1-48, N.M.S.A. 1978 provides that benefits “shall be based on, and limited to, the benefits in effect on the date of the accidental injury resulting in disability or death.”
Taylor v. Waste Mgmt. of N.M., 2021 NMCA 026 (N.M. Ct. App. 2021). “1, the statute governing TTD benefits, in 1990, amended it in 2005, and amended it again in 2017.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.