New Mexico Statutes
N.M. Stat. § 58-15-34 (2026)
Repealed
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NM-LEGnmonesource.com
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
History: Laws 2007, ch. 86, § 16; repealed by Laws 2017, ch. 110, § 25.
ANNOTATIONS
Repeals. — Laws 2017, ch. 110, § 25 repealed 58-15-34 NMSA 1978, as enacted by Laws 2007, ch. 86, § 16, relating to payday loan products, prohibited acts, effective January 1, 2018. For provisions of former section, see the 2017 NMSA on NMOneSource.com.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2014–2017 · leading case: State Ex Rel. King v. B&B Inv. Grp., Inc., 2014 NMSC 24 (N.M. 2014).
State Ex Rel. King v. B&B Inv. Grp., Inc., 2014 NMSC 24 (N.M. 2014). “” Section 58-15-34(D). Their success in evading application of the Small Loan Act does not immunize Defendants from other laws that prohibit unconscionable loan practices.”
Daye v. Cmty. Fin. Loan Serv. Centers, LLC, 280 F. Supp. 3d 1222 (D.N.M. 2017). “” N.M. Stat. Ann. § 58-15-32 (B). 68. Lenders cannot “enter into an agreement for a renewed payday loan or otherwise refinance or extend the term of a payday loan.”
Daye v. Cmty. Fin. Serv. Centers, LLC, 233 F. Supp. 3d 946 (D.N.M. 2017). “1978 § 58-15-34(A). See Supportive MSJ Brief at 17.”
— N.M. Stat. § 58-15-34(A) — 1 case
Daye v. Cmty. Fin. Serv. Centers, LLC, 233 F. Supp. 3d 946 (D.N.M. 2017). “1978 § 58-15-34(A). See Supportive MSJ Brief at 17.”
— N.M. Stat. § 58-15-34(D) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. King v. B&B Inv. Grp., Inc., 2014 NMSC 24 (N.M. 2014). “” Section 58-15-34(D). Their success in evading application of the Small Loan Act does not immunize Defendants from other laws that prohibit unconscionable loan practices.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.