New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Civil Service Law § 76 (2026)
Appeals from determinations in disciplinary proceedings
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 76. Appeals from determinations in disciplinary proceedings. 1. Appeals. Any officer or employee believing himself aggrieved by a penalty or punishment of demotion in or dismissal from the service, or suspension without pay, or a fine, or an official reprimand, unaccompanied by a remittance of said officer or employee's prehearing suspension without pay, imposed pursuant to the provisions of section seventy-five of this chapter, may appeal from such determination either by an application to the state or municipal commission having jurisdiction, or by an application to the court in accordance with the provisions of article seventy-eight of the civil practice law and rules. If such person elects to appeal to such civil service commission, he shall file such appeal in writing within twenty days after service of written notice of the determination to be reviewed, such written notice to be delivered personally or by registered mail to the last known address of such person and when notice is given by registered mail, such person shall be allowed an additional three days in which to file such appeal. 2. Procedure on appeal. Where appeal is taken to the state or municipal commission having jurisdiction, such commission shall review the record of the disciplinary proceeding and the transcript of the hearing, and shall determine such appeal on the basis of such record and transcript and such oral or written argument as the commission may determine. The commission may direct that such appeal shall be heard by one or more members of the commission or by a person or persons designated by the commission to hear such appeal on its behalf, who shall report thereon with recommendations to the commission. Upon such appeal the commission shall permit the employee to be represented by counsel. 3. Determination on appeal. The determination appealed from may be affirmed, reversed, or modified, and the state or municipal commission having jurisdiction may, in its discretion, direct the reinstatement of the appellant or permit the transfer of such appellant to a vacancy in a similar position in another division or department, or direct that his name be placed upon a preferred list pursuant to section eighty-one of this chapter. In the event that a transfer is not effected, the commission is empowered to direct the reinstatement of such officer or employee. An employee reinstated pursuant to this subdivision shall receive the salary or compensation he would have been entitled by law to have received in his position for the period of removal including any prior period of suspension without pay, less the amount of any unemployment insurance benefits he may have received during such period. The decision of such civil service commission shall be final and conclusive, and not subject to further review in any court. 4. Nothing contained in section seventy-five or seventy-six of this chapter shall be construed to repeal or modify any general, special or local law or charter provision relating to the removal or suspension of officers or employees in the competitive class of the civil service of the state or any civil division. Such sections may be supplemented, modified or replaced by agreements negotiated between the state and an employee organization pursuant to article fourteen of this chapter. Where such sections are so supplemented, modified or replaced, any employee against whom charges have been preferred prior to the effective date of such supplementation, modification or replacement shall continue to be subject to the provisions of such sections as in effect on the date such charges were preferred.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 82
cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1976–2026 · leading case: City of Mount Vernon v. Cuevas, 169 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2766 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001).
City of Mount Vernon v. Cuevas, 169 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2766 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001). “Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding, claiming that because its 1922 City Charter established disciplinary procedures for its police officers and such procedures are protected by Civil Service Law § 76 (4), petitioner could not be forced to negotiate that…”
Wood v. Cosgrove, 237 A.D.2d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997). “), entered November 16, 1995, which dismissed the proceeding as barred by Civil Service Law § 76 (3). Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.”
Montella v. Bratton, 93 N.Y.2d 424 (NY 1999). “Analysis The New York City Civil Service Commission is authorized to hear and decide appeals by persons aggrieved by certain actions or determinations of the Commissioner of Citywide Administrative Services and persons “aggrieved by a penalty or punishment * * * imposed pursuant…”
Seabrook v. Jacobson, 970 F. Supp. 252 (S.D.N.Y. 1997). “Civil Service Law § 76(4), however, permits the City and a Union to enter into an agreement pursuant to Article 14 of the CM Service Law supplementing, modifying or replacing Civil Service Law § 75(3).”
City of New York v. Uniformed Fire Officers Ass'n, Local 854, 163 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2668 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999). “” Similarly in Matter of City of New York v MacDonald ( 201 AD2d 258 , lv denied 83 NY2d 759 ), this Court held that the statutory discretion of the Police Commissioner to discipline police officers (Civil Service Law § 76 [4]) would be impermissibly compromised by a contract…”
Town of Wallkill v. Civil Serv. Employees Ass'n, 19 N.Y.3d 1066 (NY 2012). “However, Civil Service Law § 76 (4) states that “[njothing contained in section seventy-five or seventy-six of this chapter shall be construed to repeal or modify any general, special or local” preexisting laws (emphasis added; see Matter of Patrolmen’s Benevolent Assn.”
City of New York v. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n, 924 N.E.2d 336 (NY 2009). “We noted that “where Civil Service Law §§ 75 and 76 apply, police discipline may be the subject of collective bargaining” (PBA v PERB, 6 NY3d at 573 ); however, New York City Charter § 434 (a) and Administrative Code § 14-115 (a) were grandfathered pursuant to Civil Service Law…”
Von Essen v. New York City Civil Serv. Comm'n, 825 N.E.2d 128 (NY 2005). “Discussion The Civil Service Commission claims jurisdiction here pursuant to Civil Service Law § 76 (1), which permits an appeal to that Commission from punishment “imposed pursuant to the provisions of section seventy-five of this chapter.”
De Guzman v. State, 129 A.D.3d 1189 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015). “Petitioner appealed to respondent pursuant to Civil Service Law § 76 (1), and respondent affirmed the Hearing Officer’s determination.”
Meringolo v. Jacobson, 173 Misc. 2d 650 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1997). “The City respondents argue that *653 Administrative Code § 9-112 is exempt under Civil Service Law § 76 (4), even though it was passed 18 years later.”
City of Middletown v. City of Middletown Police Benevolent Ass'n, 81 A.D.3d 1238 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). “Those cases preceded the enactment of *1241 Civil Service Law § 76 (4), which provides that Civil Service Law §§75 and 76—which set forth disciplinary procedures applicable to public employees generally as well as those applicable to honorably discharged veterans and volunteer…”
Nieves v. Haera, 165 A.D.2d 201 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991). “With respect to the Civil Service Law, it is noted that Civil Service Law § 76 (4) specifically states that: "Nothing contained in section seventy-five or seventy-six of this chapter shall be construed to repeal or modify any general, special or local law * * * relating to the…”
— N.Y. Civil Service Law § 76(1) — 1 case
Matter of Almanzar v. City of New York City Civ. Serv. Commn., 2018 NY Slip Op 8062 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018).
— N.Y. Civil Service Law § 76(3) — 1 case
Matter of Campos v. New York City Dept. of Corr., 2019 NY Slip Op 3966 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019).
— N.Y. Civil Service Law § 76(4) — 2 cases
Seabrook v. Jacobson, 970 F. Supp. 252 (S.D.N.Y. 1997). “Civil Service Law § 76(4), however, permits the City and a Union to enter into an agreement pursuant to Article 14 of the CM Service Law supplementing, modifying or replacing Civil Service Law § 75(3).”
Murray v. Town of N. Castle, 2022 NY Slip Op 00675 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.