New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. Executive Law § 295 (2026)

General powers and duties of division

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 295. General powers and duties of division. The division, by and
through the commissioner or his or her duly authorized officer or
employee, shall have the following functions, powers and duties:
  1. To establish and maintain its principal office, and such other
offices within the state as it may deem necessary.
  2. To function at any place within the state.
  3. To appoint such officers, attorneys, clerks and other employees and
agents, consultants and special committees as it may deem necessary, fix
their compensation within the limitations provided by law, and prescribe
their duties.
  4. To obtain upon request and utilize the services of all governmental
departments and agencies.
  5. To adopt, promulgate, amend and rescind suitable rules and
regulations to carry out the provisions of this article, and the
policies and practices of the division in connection therewith.
  6. (a) To receive, investigate and pass upon complaints alleging
violations of this article.
  (b) Upon its own motion, to test and investigate and to make, sign and
file complaints alleging violations of this article and to initiate
investigations and studies to carry out the purposes of this article.
  7. To hold hearings, to provide where appropriate for
cross-interrogatories, subpoena witnesses, compel their attendance,
administer oaths, take the testimony of any person under oath, and in
connection therewith, to require the production for examination of any
books or papers relating to any matter under investigation or in
question before the division. The division may make rules as to the
issuance of subpoenas which may be issued by the division at any stage
of any investigation or proceeding before it.
  In any such investigation or hearing, the commissioner, or an officer
duly designated by the commissioner to conduct such investigation or
hearing, may confer immunity in accordance with the provisions of
section 50.20 of the criminal procedure law.
  8. To create such advisory councils, local, regional or state-wide, as
in its judgment will aid in effectuating the purposes of this article
and of section eleven of article one of the constitution of this state,
and the division may empower them to study the problems of
discrimination in all or specific fields of human relationships or in
specific instances of discrimination because of age, race, creed, color,
national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression,
military status, sex, disability or marital status and make
recommendations to the division for the development of policies and
procedures in general and in specific instances. The advisory councils
also shall disseminate information about the division's activities to
organizations and individuals in their localities. Such advisory
councils shall be composed of representative citizens, serving without
pay, but with reimbursement for actual and necessary traveling expenses;
and the division may make provision for technical and clerical
assistance to such councils and for the expenses of such assistance.
  9. To develop human rights plans and policies for the state and assist
in their execution and to make investigations and studies appropriate to
effectuate this article and to issue such publications and such results
of investigations and research as in its judgement will tend to inform
persons of the rights assured and remedies provided under this article,
to promote good-will and minimize or eliminate discrimination because of
age, race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, gender
identity or expression, military status, sex, disability or marital
status.
  10. To render each year to the governor and to the legislature a full
written report of all its activities and of its recommendations.
  11. To inquire into incidents of and conditions which may lead to
tension and conflict among racial, religious and nationality groups and
to take such action within the authority granted by law to the division,
as may be designed to alleviate such conditions, tension and conflict.
  12. To furnish any person with such technical assistance as the
division deems appropriate to further compliance with the purposes or
provisions of this article.
  13. To promote the creation of human rights agencies by counties,
cities, villages or towns in circumstances the division deems
appropriate.
  14. To accept, with the approval of the governor, as agent of the
state, any grant, including federal grants, or any gift for any of the
purposes of this article. Any moneys so received may be expended by the
division to effectuate any purpose of this article, subject to the same
limitations as to approval of expenditures and audit as are prescribed
for state moneys appropriated for the purposes of this article.
  15. To adopt an official seal.
  16. To have concurrent jurisdiction with the New York city commission
on human rights over the administration and enforcement of title C of
chapter one of the administrative code of the city of New York.
  17. To establish a dedicated telephone line to provide assistance to
individuals with complaints of housing discrimination. Such assistance
shall include, but not be limited to, directing individuals to resources
available to the public regarding housing discrimination. The division
shall operate such dedicated telephone line during regular business
hours and shall post the telephone number for such dedicated phone line
on the website of the division. The commissioner is hereby authorized
and directed to promulgate rules and regulations to effectuate the
purposes of this subdivision.
  18. To establish a toll free confidential hotline to provide
individuals with complaints of workplace sexual harassment counsel and
assistance. The division shall operate this hotline during regular
business hours and disseminate information about this hotline in order
to ensure public knowledge of the hotline, including by working with the
department of labor to ensure that information on the hotline is
included in any materials employers must post or provide to employees
regarding sexual harassment. The division will work with organizations
representing attorneys, including but not limited to the New York state
bar association, to recruit attorneys experienced in providing counsel
related to sexual harassment matters who can provide pro bono assistance
and counsel to individuals that contact the hotline. The hotline shall
comply with all of the requirements for a program operated under the New
York Rules of Professional Conduct, 12 NYCRR, Rule 6.5 (Participation in
limited pro bono legal service programs). Attorneys may not solicit, or
permit employees or agents of the attorneys to solicit on the attorney's
behalf, further representation of any individuals they advise through
the hotline relating to discussed sexual harassment complaint.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 31 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1967–2025 · leading case: Town of Oyster Bay v. Kirkland, 978 N.E.2d 1237 (NY 2012).
Town of Oyster Bay v. Kirkland, 978 N.E.2d 1237 (NY 2012). · cites it 3× “The Town sought (1) a declaration that the SDHR was without authority to file a complaint in the absence of an individual complainant, (2) a declaration that the Town is not a proper respondent with respect to the SDHR’s complaint *1037 and is not subject to the Human Rights Law…”
Town of Oyster Bay v. Kirkland, 81 A.D.3d 812 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). · cites it 4× “*813 In an action, inter alia, to permanently enjoin the defendants from proceeding with an administrative complaint against the plaintiff alleging violations of the Human Rights Law, and for a judgment declaring that the defendant New York State Division of Human Rights acted…”
Murphy v. Kirkland, 88 A.D.3d 267 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). “The division or the complainant shall have the power reasonably and fairly to amend the complaint. No party may be removed by any amendment.”
Wendy J. Norville v. Staten Island Univ. Hosp., 196 F.3d 89 (2d Cir. 1999). “1999) (“the ADA”), the New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law § 295 (McKinney 1993 & Supp.”
New York State Club Ass'n v. City of New York, 505 N.E.2d 915 (NY 1987). “As we have already noted, no preemption is claimed here or is discernible from the statutory scheme (see generally, Executive Law §§ 295, 300; General Municipal Law §§ 239-o, 239-s).”
MATTER OF TOWN OF HUNTINGTON v. New York State Div. of Human Rights, 624 N.E.2d 678 (NY 1993). “Moreover, it is unquestioned that here the Division maintains jurisdiction to investigate and pass upon claims of discrimination (see, Executive Law § 295 [6] [a]). The Town has failed to establish a "clear legal right” to the relief it seeks, and argues that after the Division…”
Beer Garden, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Auth., 79 N.Y.2d 266 (NY 1992). “…of Rotunno v City of Rochester, 120 AD2d 160, 163 , affd 71 NY2d 995 ; see, by contrast, Banking Law § 14 [1]; Executive Law § 295 [5]; Labor Law § 21 [11]; Social Services Law § 20 [3] [f]; Vehicle and Traffic Law § 215.) We agree with petitioners that the SLA cannot…”
Scott v. Rochester Gas & Elec., 333 F. Supp. 3d 273 (W.D.N.Y. 2018). “State Human Rights Law, Executive Law § 295. The EEOC has a workshare agreement with the NYSDHR, a deferral-state agency.”
Theresa McINNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, California, Dep't of Consum. Affairs, Defendants-Appellees, 943 F.2d 1088 (9th Cir. 1991). “Such powers are common to many administrative agencies, including the New York State Division of Human Rights, the state agency whose decision was at issue in Kremer.”
Levy v. City Comm'n on Human Rights, 651 N.E.2d 1264 (NY 1995). “We reject the Commission’s contention that this provision operates to vest the Commission with jurisdiction over the Transit Authority because the State Division of Human Rights enjoys such jurisdiction (compare, Executive Law § 295 [16] [State Division enjoys concurrent…”
New York State Div. of Human Rights v. H&R Block Tax Servs., Inc., 71 A.D.3d 540 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010). · cites it 4× “” DHR is empowered “[u]pon its own motion, to test and investigate and to make, sign and file complaints alleging violations of this article and to initiate investigations and studies to carry out the purposes of this article” (Executive Law § 295 [6] [b]). DHR is also empowered…”
Gen. Motors Corp.—Delco Prods. Div. v. Rosa, 624 N.E.2d 142 (NY 1993). “The Human Rights Law, however, in delineating the Division’s functions — including the power and duty "[t]o receive, investigate and pass upon complaints alleging violations of this article” — explicitly empowers the Commissioner to act through a "duly authorized officer or…”
— N.Y. Executive Law § 295(6) — 3 cases
Kirkland v. City of Peekskill, 651 F. Supp. 1225 (S.D.N.Y. 1987).
Mendoza v. SSC & B Lintas, New York, 799 F. Supp. 1502 (S.D.N.Y. 1992).
Cole v. Cbs, Inc., 634 F. Supp. 1558 (S.D.N.Y. 1986).
— N.Y. Executive Law § 295(7) — 1 case
Theresa McINNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, California, Dep't of Consum. Affairs, Defendants-Appellees, 943 F.2d 1088 (9th Cir. 1991). “Such powers are common to many administrative agencies, including the New York State Division of Human Rights, the state agency whose decision was at issue in Kremer.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.