New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Judiciary Law § 474 (2026)
Compensation of attorney or counsellor
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 474. Compensation of attorney or counsellor. The compensation of an attorney or counsellor for his services is governed by agreement, express or implied, which is not restrained by law, except that no agreement made hereafter between an attorney and a guardian of an infant for the compensation of such attorney, dependent upon the success of the prosecution by said attorney of a claim belonging to said infant, or by which such attorney is to receive a percentage of any recovery or award in behalf of such infant or a sum equal to a percentage of any such recovery or award, shall be valid or enforceable unless made as hereinafter provided. An attorney may contract with the guardian of an infant to prosecute, by suit or otherwise, any claim for the benefit of an infant for a compensation to said attorney dependent upon the success in the prosecution of such claim, subject to the power of the court, as hereinafter provided, to fix the amount of such compensation. Whenever such a contract shall have been entered into between an attorney and a guardian of an infant, upon the recovery of a judgment, or the obtaining of an award in behalf of the said infant, or upon any compromise or settlement of such claim, the attorney may apply, upon notice to the guardian, to the judge, justice or surrogate before whom the said action or proceeding was tried, or to whom an application for compromise or settlement was made, in case the said action or proceeding was tried, or the said application was made at a court held within this state; or to a special term of said court, in case the said action or proceeding was tried before some person other than a justice thereof, or said claim was compromised or settled after said suit was begun, or in case of the death or disability of the judge or justice before whom the action was tried; or to special term of the supreme court in case the recovery, award, compromise or settlement was not had in any court of this state. Such application shall set forth briefly the contract, the services performed by the attorney and pray that there be awarded to him a suitable amount out of the recovery, award, compromise or settlement obtained through his efforts as attorney on behalf of the infant. The court, judge or surrogate to which such application is made, upon being satisfied that due notice of the said application as been given to the said guardian, shall proceed summarily to determine the value of the services of said attorney, taking such proof from either the attorney or the guardian by affidavit, reference or the examination of witnesses before the said court, judge or surrogate, as may seem to be necessary and proper, and shall thereupon make an order determining the suitable compensation for the attorney for his services therein, which sum shall thereafter be received by the said attorney for his services in behalf of the said infant; and no other compensation shall be paid or allowed by the guardian for such services out of the estate of said infant. If a copy of such order awarding the compensation with notice of entry be thereafter served by the said attorney upon the adverse party to the said litigation or the person making such compromise or settlement and upon the custodian of the funds recovered, in case there be such custodian, such award shall become and constitute a lien to the amount thereof on behalf of the said attorney upon such recovery, award, settlement or fund.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 48
cases (13 in the last 5 years), 1959–2026 · leading case: White v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 57 A.D.3d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008).
White v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 57 A.D.3d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008). “Judiciary Law § 474 sets forth the general rule as to attorney compensation, providing that “[t]he compensation of an attorney or counsellor for his services is governed by agreement, express or implied, which is not restrained by law.”
Albunio v. City of New York, 11 N.E.3d 1104 (NY 2014). “Clearly, the construction of attorney-client retainer agreements is the province of state, not federal, law (see generally Gair, supra, Judiciary Law § 474; Alderman v Pan Am World Airways, 169 F3d 99, 103 [2d Cir 1999] [“Federal courts apply state law when ruling on the…”
Teichner v. W & J Holsteins, Inc., 478 N.E.2d 177 (NY 1985). “This is a special proceeding to approve the settlement of an infant’s personal injury action and award counsel fees (see, CPLR1208; Judiciary Law § 474; 22 NYCRR 603.8). The settlement of $1,200,000 has been approved and the remaining dispute concerns the attorneys’ fees to be…”
King v. Fox, 851 N.E.2d 1184 (NY 2006). “To assist in determining at what point a contingent fee agreement becomes unconscionable or unreasonable, the Legislature has enacted a statute, and the Appellate Divisions of the Supreme Court have promulgated joint rules, for establishing the reasonableness of contingent fee…”
Mills v. Chauvin, 103 A.D.3d 1041 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013). “After substantial discovery, Chauvin moved for an order pursuant to Judiciary Law § 474 declaring that Mills’ portion of the contingency fee should be determined on a quantum meruit *1044 basis.”
Schweizer v. Mulvehill, 93 F. Supp. 2d 376 (S.D.N.Y. 2000). “See N.Y. Jud. L. § 474 -a. 32 . Prof. Briekman was retained as an expert by the plaintiff in this case.”
In re the Arbitration between Cara Serazio-Plant & Channing, 299 A.D.2d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002). “Respondent initially contends that the matrimonial rules (see 22 NYCRR part 1400; see also Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-106 [c] [2] [22 NYCRR 1200.”
Achrem v. Expressway Plaza Ltd. P'ship, 917 P.2d 447 (Nev. 1996). “Code § 6146 (West 1990); N.Y. Jud. Law § 474 (McKinney 1983). Also, some states draw a distinction between the assignment of an action itself and the assignment of the proceeds of that action.”
Gair v. Peck, 160 N.E.2d 43 (NY 1959). “1), and that a court may not disregard that agreement and substitute its own judgment as to what it believes to be the appropriate compensation for the attorney’s services.”
Newman v. Silver, 553 F. Supp. 485 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). “N.Y.Jud.Law § 474 (McKinney 1968); Application of Peters, 271 A.”
Martegani v. Cirrus Design Corp., 687 F. Supp. 2d 373 (S.D.N.Y. 2010). “See CPLR § 1208(b); NY Jud. Law § 474. “ ‘[T]he burden is on counsel to keep and present records from which the court may determine the nature of the work done, the need for it, and the amount of time reasonably required; where adequate contemporaneous records have not been kept…”
Williamson v. John D. Quinn Constr. Corp., 537 F. Supp. 613 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). “See N.Y. Judiciary Law § 474 (McKinney 1978); Gair v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.