New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. Labor Law § 626 (2026)

Exclusive procedure

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 626. Exclusive procedure. The procedure herein provided for hearings
before referees with respect to any determination, rule, or order of the
commissioner, and for decisions thereon and for appeals therefrom, first
to the appeal board and thereafter to the courts, shall be the sole and
exclusive procedure notwithstanding any other provision of law.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1986–2014 · leading case: Inst. for Resource Mgmt., Inc. v. Roberts, 122 A.D.2d 465 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986).
Inst. for Resource Mgmt., Inc. v. Roberts, 122 A.D.2d 465 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986). “The Legislature has specifically granted the ALJ and the Board the jurisdiction to decide the question of whether a person or entity is an employer within the meaning of the *467 Labor Law (Labor Law § 620 [1] [b]; § 621).”
MacGilfrey v. Pugh, 217 A.D.2d 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995). “These two sections relate to decisions of the Commissioner of Labor or appeals therefrom (Labor Law § 626), or direct appeals to this Court when claimants are aggrieved after a decision of the Board (Labor Law § 624) (see, Institute for Resource Mgt.”
Numrich Gun Parts Corp. v. Rivera, 115 A.D.3d 1050 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014). “Supreme Court granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition/complaint based upon lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and this appeal by petitioner ensued.”
Numrich Gun Parts Corp. v. Rivera, 115 A.D.3d 1050 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014). “Supreme Court granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition/complaint based upon lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and this appeal by petitioner ensued.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.