New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Labor Law § 663 (2026)
Civil action
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 663. Civil action. 1. By employee. If any employee is paid by his or her employer less than the wage to which he or she is entitled under the provisions of this article, he or she shall recover in a civil action the amount of any such underpayments, together with costs all reasonable attorney's fees, prejudgment interest as required under the civil practice law and rules, and unless the employer proves a good faith basis to believe that its underpayment of wages was in compliance with the law, an additional amount as liquidated damages equal to one hundred percent of the total of such underpayments found to be due. Any agreement between the employee, and the employer to work for less than such wage shall be no defense to such action. 2. By commissioner. On behalf of any employee paid less than the wage to which the employee is entitled under the provisions of this article, the commissioner may bring any legal action necessary, including administrative action, to collect such claim, and the employer shall be required to pay the full amount of the underpayment, plus costs, and unless the employer proves a good faith basis to believe that its underpayment was in compliance with the law, an additional amount as liquidated damages. Liquidated damages shall be calculated by the commissioner as no more than one hundred percent of the total amount of underpayments found to be due the employee. In any action brought by the commissioner in a court of competent jurisdiction, liquidated damages shall be calculated as an amount equal to one hundred percent of underpayments found to be due the employee. 3. Limitation of time. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an action to recover upon a liability imposed by this article must be commenced within six years. The statute of limitations shall be tolled from the date an employee files a complaint with the commissioner or the commissioner commences an investigation, whichever is earlier, until an order to comply issued by the commissioner becomes final, or where the commissioner does not issue an order, until the date on which the commissioner notifies the complainant that the investigation has concluded. Investigation by the commissioner shall not be a prerequisite to nor a bar against a person bringing a civil action under this article. 4. Attorneys' fees. In any civil action by an employee or by the commissioner, the employee or commissioner shall have the right to collect attorneys' fees and costs incurred in enforcing any court judgment. Any judgment or court order awarding remedies under this section shall provide that if any amounts remain unpaid upon the expiration of ninety days following issuance of judgment, or ninety days after expiration of the time to appeal and no appeal therefrom is then pending, whichever is later, the total amount of judgment shall automatically increase by fifteen percent.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 163
cases (88 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case: Pineda v. Masonry Constr., Inc., 831 F. Supp. 2d 666 (S.D.N.Y. 2011).
Pineda v. Masonry Constr., Inc., 831 F. Supp. 2d 666 (S.D.N.Y. 2011). “N.Y. Lab. Law § 663 (1), (3). An employee bringing an action for unpaid overtime wages under the FLSA has the burden of proving that he performed work for which he was not properly compensated.”
Santillan v. Henao, 822 F. Supp. 2d 284 (E.D.N.Y 2011). “N.Y. Lab. Law § 663 (1). Like its federal counterpart, the Labor Law requires that employers maintain records for their employees who fall under the Labor Law’s wage protections.”
Jemine v. Dennis, 901 F. Supp. 2d 365 (E.D.N.Y 2012). “§ 255 (a); N.Y. Lab. Law § 663 (1), (3). New York state also “does not require a plaintiff to show either a nexus with interstate commerce or that the employer has any minimum amount of annual sales.”
Nakahata v. New York-Presbyterian Healthcare Sys., Inc., 723 F.3d 192 (2d Cir. 2013). “” N.Y. Lab. Law § 663 (1) (McKinney Supp.2012), as amended by Wage Theft Prevention Act, ch.”
Inclan v. New York Hosp. Grp., Inc., 95 F. Supp. 3d 490 (S.D.N.Y. 2015). “23, 2009); see also N.Y. Labor Law § 663 (1) (version effective prior to Nov.”
Gurung v. Malhotra, 851 F. Supp. 2d 583 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). “N.Y. Lab. Law § 663 (3). Some of Gurung’s FLSA claims accrued more than three years before she initiated this lawsuit.”
Chuan Wang v. Palmisano, 157 F. Supp. 3d 306 (S.D.N.Y. 2016). “151, § 20A)), with N.Y. Lab. Law § 663 (3) (six-year limitation period for wage claims), and Man Wei Shiu v.”
Ross v. Jenkins, 325 F. Supp. 3d 1141 (D. Kan. 2018). “§ 44-1211 (a) ; N.Y. Lab. Law § 663 (1) ; N.J. Stat. Ann.”
Avraham Gold v. New York Life Ins. Co., 730 F.3d 137 (2d Cir. 2013). “See N.Y. Lab. Law §§ 663 , 193, and 198(l-a).”
Raniere v. Citigroup Inc., 827 F. Supp. 2d 294 (S.D.N.Y. 2011). “Compare N.Y. Lab. Law § 663 (McKinney 2010) with N.”
Perkins v. 199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East, 73 F. Supp. 3d 278 (S.D.N.Y. 2014). “§ 216 (b), and the New York Labor Law (“NYLL”), N.Y. Lab. L. § 663 . Perkins also alleges that the Union breached its duty of fair representation by ignoring his requests to file grievances, in violation of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”), 29 U.”
Greathouse v. JHS Sec. Inc., 784 F.3d 105 (2d Cir. 2015). “See N.Y. Lab. Law § 663 (McKinney 2011). . These concerned the accounting for certain unlawful payroll deductions and unpaid wages, which marginally affected the amount *109 of the District Court’s award for liquidated damages-under the NYLL.”
— N.Y. Labor Law § 663(1) — 1 case
Hernandez v. Quality Blacktop Servs., Inc. (E.D.N.Y 2021).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.