New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. Public Authorities Law § 1747 (2026)

Effect of inconsistent provisions

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 1747. Effect of inconsistent provisions. Insofar as the provisions
of this title are inconsistent with the provisions of any other law,
general, special or local or of the city charter or any local law,
ordinance or resolution of the city, the provision of this title shall
be controlling, provided that nothing contained in this section shall be
held to supplement or otherwise expand the powers or duties of the
authority otherwise set forth in this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2001–2001 · leading case: Westchester Creek Corp. v. New York City Sch. Constr. Auth., 286 A.D.2d 154 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Westchester Creek Corp. v. New York City Sch. Constr. Auth., 286 A.D.2d 154 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001). “However, Public Authorities Law § 1747 contains a similar provision in favor of the School Construction Authority, reciting: “Insofar as the provisions of this title are inconsistent with the provisions of any other law, general, special or local or of the city charter or any…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.