New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Partnership Law § 40 (2026)
Rules determining rights and duties of partners
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 40. Rules determining rights and duties of partners. The rights and duties of the partners in relation to the partnership shall be determined, subject to any agreement between them, by the following rules: 1. Each partner shall be repaid his contributions, whether by way of capital or advances to the partnership property and share equally in the profits and surplus remaining after all liabilities, including those to partners, are satisfied; and except as provided in subdivision (b) of section twenty-six of this chapter, each partner must contribute toward the losses, whether of capital or otherwise, sustained by the partnership according to his share in the profits. 2. Except as provided in subdivision (b) of section twenty-six of this chapter, the partnership must indemnify every partner in respect of payments made and personal liabilities reasonably incurred by him in the ordinary and proper conduct of its business, or for the preservation of its business or property. 3. A partner, who in aid of the partnership makes any payment or advance beyond the amount of capital which he agreed to contribute, shall be paid interest from the date of the payment or advance. 4. A partner shall receive interest on the capital contributed by him only from the date when repayment should be made. 5. All partners have equal rights in the management and conduct of the partnership business. 6. No partner is entitled to remuneration for acting in the partnership business, except that a surviving partner is entitled to reasonable compensation for his services in winding up the partnership affairs. 7. No person can become a member of a partnership without the consent of all the partners. 8. Any difference arising as to ordinary matters connected with the partnership business may be decided by a majority of the partners; but no act in contravention of any agreement between the partners may be done rightfully without the consent of all the partners.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 55
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1977–2024 · leading case: Bailey v. Fish & Neave, 868 N.E.2d 956 (NY 2007).
Bailey v. Fish & Neave, 868 N.E.2d 956 (NY 2007). “In so holding, the court rejected plaintiffs’ argument that under Partnership Law § 40 (8), the permanent amendment could only be passed by unanimous consent of the partners.”
Wien & Malkin LLP v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 846 N.E.2d 1201 (NY 2006). “15 While it is clear that the affairs of partners should be managed by partners, Leona Helmsley’s agreement involved “a vote she was entitled to cast” in whatever manner she chose. Therefore, we agree with the lower court’s reasoning that the arbitrators did not manifestly…”
Gramercy Equities Corp. v. Dumont, 531 N.E.2d 629 (NY 1988). “Based upon its finding that the damages were liabilities incurred in the ordinary conduct of the joint venture, Supreme Court held that, pursuant to Partnership Law § 40 (2), Dumont was entitled to be indemnified, and the Appellate Division affirmed, without opinion.”
Ederer v. Gursky, 881 N.E.2d 204 (NY 2007). “partners from their individual obligations to account to a withdrawing partner under the earlier enacted and unamended Partnership Law § 74 (Rich, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Law of NY, Book 38, Partnership Law art 8-B, at 426; compare Partnership Law § 40 [1], [2]; §…”
Dev. Specialists, Inc. ex rel. Coudert Bros. LLP v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, 480 B.R. 145 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). “Partnership Law § 2 (“ ‘Business’ includes every trade, occupation, or profession.”
Bogoni v. Friedlander, 197 A.D.2d 281 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994). “The letter, addressed to Bogoni’s attorney, also cites the Partnership Law § 40 (7), which provides, "No person can become a member of a partnership without the consent of all the partners” and demands that title to the premises be restored to Odette Realty Co.”
Dev. Specialists, Inc. v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, 477 B.R. 318 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). “Partnership Law § 2 (“‘Business’ includes every trade, occupation, or profession.”
Birnbaum v. Birnbaum, 539 N.E.2d 574 (NY 1989). “, Partnership Law § 40 [2]). We only reaffirm here the most basic, principle that a court will not countenance the behavior of a fiduciary who, without full disclosure and consent, enters into a financial arrangement placing his spouse’s interests at odds with the interests of…”
Non-Linear Trading Co. v. Braddis Assocs., Inc., 243 A.D.2d 107 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998). “In the final analysis, the complaint in this matter sufficiently states causes of action for an accounting, to which plaintiff is absolutely entitled (Partnership Law § 40 [5]; §§ 41, 43, 44), and for judicial dissolution, should the parties not agree to voluntarily dissolve the…”
Sutton v. Burdick, 135 A.D.3d 1016 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016). “5 Partnership Law § 40 (4) provides that in the absence of an agreement pertaining to interest, “[a] partner shall receive interest on the capital contributed by him [or her] only from the date when repayment should be made.” Here, the agreement provided that defendant would be…”
Sriraman v. Patel, 761 F. Supp. 2d 7 (E.D.N.Y 2011). “See N.Y. Partnership Law §§ 40 and 71(a)(I). In making this determination, the Court can consider clerical errors in allocations to the individual accounts; breaches of any partnership agreement or of fiduciary duty or fraud committed by one partner against another; diversion or…”
Lucido v. Cravath, Swaine & Moore, 425 F. Supp. 123 (S.D.N.Y. 1977). “The discretionary, subjective judgment that necessarily goes into the Cravath partnership promotion process as- described in the complaint and the application to that process of N.Y. Partnership Law § 40 (7), allowing the unanimous consent of the partners for selection of a new…”
— N.Y. Partnership Law § 40(6) — 2 cases
Dev. Specialists, Inc. ex rel. Coudert Bros. LLP v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, 480 B.R. 145 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). “Partnership Law § 2 (“ ‘Business’ includes every trade, occupation, or profession.”
Dev. Specialists, Inc. v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, 477 B.R. 318 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). “Partnership Law § 2 (“‘Business’ includes every trade, occupation, or profession.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.