New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. Partnership Law § 40 (2026)

Rules determining rights and duties of partners

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 40. Rules determining rights and duties of partners. The rights and
duties of the partners in relation to the partnership shall be
determined, subject to any agreement between them, by the following
rules:
  1. Each partner shall be repaid his contributions, whether by way of
capital or advances to the partnership property and share equally in the
profits and surplus remaining after all liabilities, including those to
partners, are satisfied; and except as provided in subdivision (b) of
section twenty-six of this chapter, each partner must contribute toward
the losses, whether of capital or otherwise, sustained by the
partnership according to his share in the profits.
  2.  Except as provided in subdivision (b) of section twenty-six of
this chapter, the partnership must indemnify every partner in respect of
payments made and personal liabilities reasonably incurred by him in the
ordinary and proper conduct of its business, or for the preservation of
its business or property.
  3. A partner, who in aid of the partnership makes any payment or
advance beyond the amount of capital which he agreed to contribute,
shall be paid interest from the date of the payment or advance.
  4. A partner shall receive interest on the capital contributed by him
only from the date when repayment should be made.
  5. All partners have equal rights in the management and conduct of the
partnership business.
  6. No partner is entitled to remuneration for acting in the
partnership business, except that a surviving partner is entitled to
reasonable compensation for his services in winding up the partnership
affairs.
  7. No person can become a member of a partnership without the consent
of all the partners.
  8. Any difference arising as to ordinary matters connected with the
partnership business may be decided by a majority of the partners; but
no act in contravention of any agreement between the partners may be
done rightfully without the consent of all the partners.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 55 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1977–2024 · leading case: Bailey v. Fish & Neave, 868 N.E.2d 956 (NY 2007).
Bailey v. Fish & Neave, 868 N.E.2d 956 (NY 2007). · cites it 3× “In so holding, the court rejected plaintiffs’ argument that under Partnership Law § 40 (8), the permanent amendment could only be passed by unanimous consent of the partners.”
Wien & Malkin LLP v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 846 N.E.2d 1201 (NY 2006). · cites it 2× “15 While it is clear that the affairs of partners should be managed by partners, Leona Helmsley’s agreement involved “a vote she was entitled to cast” in whatever manner she chose. Therefore, we agree with the lower court’s reasoning that the arbitrators did not manifestly…”
Gramercy Equities Corp. v. Dumont, 531 N.E.2d 629 (NY 1988). · cites it 5× “Based upon its finding that the damages were liabilities incurred in the ordinary conduct of the joint venture, Supreme Court held that, pursuant to Partnership Law § 40 (2), Dumont was entitled to be indemnified, and the Appellate Division affirmed, without opinion.”
Ederer v. Gursky, 881 N.E.2d 204 (NY 2007). · cites it 4× “partners from their individual obligations to account to a withdrawing partner under the earlier enacted and unamended Partnership Law § 74 (Rich, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Law of NY, Book 38, Partnership Law art 8-B, at 426; compare Partnership Law § 40 [1], [2]; §…”
Dev. Specialists, Inc. ex rel. Coudert Bros. LLP v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, 480 B.R. 145 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). · cites it 5× “Partnership Law § 2 (“ ‘Business’ includes every trade, occupation, or profession.”
Bogoni v. Friedlander, 197 A.D.2d 281 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994). · cites it 2× “The letter, addressed to Bogoni’s attorney, also cites the Partnership Law § 40 (7), which provides, "No person can become a member of a partnership without the consent of all the partners” and demands that title to the premises be restored to Odette Realty Co.”
Dev. Specialists, Inc. v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, 477 B.R. 318 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). · cites it 5× “Partnership Law § 2 (“‘Business’ includes every trade, occupation, or profession.”
Birnbaum v. Birnbaum, 539 N.E.2d 574 (NY 1989). “, Partnership Law § 40 [2]). We only reaffirm here the most basic, principle that a court will not countenance the behavior of a fiduciary who, without full disclosure and consent, enters into a financial arrangement placing his spouse’s interests at odds with the interests of…”
Non-Linear Trading Co. v. Braddis Assocs., Inc., 243 A.D.2d 107 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998). “In the final analysis, the complaint in this matter sufficiently states causes of action for an accounting, to which plaintiff is absolutely entitled (Partnership Law § 40 [5]; §§ 41, 43, 44), and for judicial dissolution, should the parties not agree to voluntarily dissolve the…”
Sutton v. Burdick, 135 A.D.3d 1016 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016). · cites it 4× “5 Partnership Law § 40 (4) provides that in the absence of an agreement pertaining to interest, “[a] partner shall receive interest on the capital contributed by him [or her] only from the date when repayment should be made.” Here, the agreement provided that defendant would be…”
Sriraman v. Patel, 761 F. Supp. 2d 7 (E.D.N.Y 2011). · cites it 2× “See N.Y. Partnership Law §§ 40 and 71(a)(I). In making this determination, the Court can consider clerical errors in allocations to the individual accounts; breaches of any partnership agreement or of fiduciary duty or fraud committed by one partner against another; diversion or…”
Lucido v. Cravath, Swaine & Moore, 425 F. Supp. 123 (S.D.N.Y. 1977). · cites it 2× “The discretionary, subjective judgment that necessarily goes into the Cravath partnership promotion process as- described in the complaint and the application to that process of N.Y. Partnership Law § 40 (7), allowing the unanimous consent of the partners for selection of a new…”
— N.Y. Partnership Law § 40(6) — 2 cases
Dev. Specialists, Inc. ex rel. Coudert Bros. LLP v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, 480 B.R. 145 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). “Partnership Law § 2 (“ ‘Business’ includes every trade, occupation, or profession.”
Dev. Specialists, Inc. v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, 477 B.R. 318 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). “Partnership Law § 2 (“‘Business’ includes every trade, occupation, or profession.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.