New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. Private Housing Finance Law § 10 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 10. Short title. This article shall be known and may be cited and
referred to as the "limited-profit housing companies law."

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 18 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1974–2026 · leading case: Wilson v. New York City Dep't of Hous. Pres. & Dev., 2016 NY Slip Op 8533 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Wilson v. New York City Dep't of Hous. Pres. & Dev., 2016 NY Slip Op 8533 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016). “The petitioner is a tenant/cooperator in a building governed by the Mitchell-Lama program (see Private Housing Finance Law § 10 et seq.).”

McManmon v. York Hill Hous., Inc., 73 A.D.3d 1137 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010). “The decedent owned an apartment in a “Mitchell-Lama” cooperative housing development (see Private Housing Finance Law § 10 et seq.) in New York City.”

Miney v. Donovan, 68 A.D.3d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009). “*877 In September 2001 the petitioner moved into her mother’s apartment, located in a Mitchell-Lama housing development (see Private Housing Finance Law § 10 et seq. [hereinafter the Mitchell-Lama Law]) in Queens known as the Big Six Towers, Inc.”

Jones v. Tully, 378 F. Supp. 286 (E.D.N.Y 1974). “As finally approved by HUD, the Project involves Federal grants and loans for site acquisition only, with support for actual construction to be provided under New York State’s “Mitchell-Lama” Program, N.Y. Private Housing Finance Law § 10 (McKinney’s Consol.”

Ryerson Tower, Inc. v. St. James Towers, Inc., 131 A.D.2d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987). “), as a series of cooperatively owned buildings commonly known as a "Mitchell-Lama” project, the location of the ramps leading to the rear basement entrances of the three buildings, the position of the defendant’s parking lot immediately adjacent to the ramp of the plaintiff’s…”

Matter of King-Rubie v. Wambua, 141 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016). “The determination of the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (hereinafter DHPD) that *590 the petitioner did not have succession rights to a certain apartment located in a Mitchell-Lama cooperative housing development (see Private Housing Finance Law…”

Rui Zen Cao v. New York City Dep't of Hous. Pres. & Dev., 63 A.D.3d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009). “The petitioner is the shareholder and tenant of record of a one-bedroom apartment (hereinafter the subject apartment) in a Mitchell-Lama cooperative housing development (see Private Housing Finance Law § 10 et seq.) owned by Lindsay Park Housing Corp.”

Concourse Vill., Inc. v. Bilotti, 133 Misc. 2d 973 (N.Y. City Civ. Ct. 1986). “, is a cooperative housing corporation organized pursuant to the Limited-Profit Housing Companies Law of New York (Private Housing Finance Law § 10 et seq.).”

Levin v. Dep't of Hous. Pres. & Dev., 140 Misc. 2d 110 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1988). “Furthermore, the long-standing policy prohibiting testate or intestate succession to the shares of stock of deceased tenant/ stockholders of public housing applies to article 2 (Mitchell-Lama) housing companies (Private Housing Finance Law § 10 et seq.) (see, Concourse Vil.”

Matter of Lockley v. Hous. Preserv. & Dev. of N.Y. City, 142 A.D.3d 1075 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016). “Under New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (hereinafter HPD) rules, a housing company participating in the Mitchell-Lama housing program (see Private Housing Finance Law § 10 et seq.) is prohibited from initiating an eviction proceeding based upon a…”

Trump Vill. Section 3, Inc. v. City of New York, 109 A.D.3d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013). “is appeal, we are asked to determine whether a taxable transfer occurs under Tax Law § 1201 (b) and Administrative Code of the City of New York § 11-2102 (a) when a residential housing cooperative corporation amends its certificate of incorporation as a part of its voluntary…”

Matter of de Suze v. Linden Plaza Preserv., 135 A.D.3d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016). “The petitioners/plaintiffs (hereinafter the plaintiffs) were tenants of the Linden Plaza housing development (hereinafter the development), which was developed as a participant in the Mitchell-Lama housing program (see Private Housing Finance Law § 10 et seq.).”

Show all 18 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.