New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Social Services Law § 349 (2026)
Eligibility
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 349. Eligibility. A. Family assistance shall be given to a pregnant individual, a parent or other relative as herein specified for the benefit of a child under eighteen years of age, or of a child under nineteen years of age who is a full-time student regularly attending a secondary school or in the equivalent level of vocational or technical training if, in the judgment of the social services official: 1. the granting of an allowance will be in the interest of such child, and 2. the parent or other relative is a fit person to bring up such child so that his or her physical, mental and moral well-being will be safe-guarded, and 3. such child is a resident of the state on the date of application for aid. B. 1. An allowance may be granted for the aid of such child who is living with a parent or other adult related to him or her by blood, marriage or adoption eligible to receive assistance on his or her behalf pursuant to the federal social security act, the provisions of this chapter and regulations of the department. 2. Notwithstanding the provisions of this title and titles three and four of this article to the contrary, the department may by regulation require that some or all persons, or households containing such persons, who are otherwise eligible for family assistance and are permanently disabled and awaiting determinations of eligibility for federal supplemental security income under title XVI of the federal social security act receive family assistance without use of federal funding and the department is authorized to reclassify retroactively all or a portion of the amount of any family assistance which otherwise has been or would be received by any such person or household if such reclassification is in the financial interests of the state; provided, however, that any such retroactive reclassification shall be accomplished without diminution or increase of the family assistance grant previously paid and shall not affect any rights, obligations or entitlements of any such person under the family assistance program. Any such transfer or reclassification may be accomplished by appropriate notation in the records of the social services district or the department, and no other notice thereof need be made. C. In making such allowances consideration shall be given to the ability of the relative making application and of any other relatives to support and care for or to contribute to the support and care of such child. In making all such allowances it shall be made certain that the religious faith of the child shall be preserved and protected. D. Family assistance shall not be payable to a family for any month in which any caretaker relative with whom the child is living is, on the last day of such month, participating in a strike, and no individual's needs shall be included in determining the amount of such aid which is payable for any month to a family if, on the last day of such month, such individual is participating in a strike.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1987–1998 · leading case: Jiggetts v. Grinker, 553 N.E.2d 570 (NY 1990).
Jiggetts v. Grinker, 553 N.E.2d 570 (NY 1990). “Finally, we do not agree that in enacting section 350 (1) (a) the Legislature could not have intended the construction we adopt because ADC assistance is provided only to needy children deprived of parental support (Social Services Law § 349 [B]) and some do not receive the…”
Lovelace v. Gross, 605 N.E.2d 339 (NY 1992). “The State actually furnishes the AFDC assistance (Social Services Law § 349) and — so long as Federal eligibility standards are met — is then reimbursed by the Federal Government for at least 50% of its allowable costs ( 42 USC § 602 [a]; § 603; Social Services Law § 153).”
Jiggetts v. Grinker, 148 A.D.2d 1 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989). “(Social Services Law § 349 [B] [1]; 42 USC § 606 [a].”
Aumick v. Bane, 161 Misc. 2d 271 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1994). “(Social Services Law § 349.) The other program is known as Home Relief (HR), which is intended for those individuals unable to maintain themselves and is funded by the State of New York and local counties.”
Brukhman v. Giuliani, 253 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998). “Plaintiffs are public assistance recipients of either home relief (see, Social Services Law § 158) or aid to families with dependent children ([ADC] see, Social Services Law § 349 [A]) who have been required by New York City Department of Social Services to participate in its…”
In re Coop, 140 Misc. 2d 951 (N.Y.C. Fam. Ct. 1988). “(Social Services Law § 62 [1]; Matter of Jones v Berman, supra.) CSS argues, somewhat tautologically, that these sources of funding are now totally unavailable, by regulations of SDSS, which according to CSS’ memorandum of law, provide: AFDC is excluded "when [a child] is…”
Graham v. Perales, 130 A.D.2d 846 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987). “Social Services Law § 349 (c) holds to the same effect.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.