NC General Statutes
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 128-7 (2026)
Officer to hold until successor qualified
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NCLEGncleg.gov (official)
JustiaChapter 128
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
All officers shall continue in their respective offices until their successors are elected or appointed, and duly qualified. (1848, c. 64, s. 2; R.C., c. 77, s. 3; Code, s. 1872; Rev., s. 2368; C.S., s. 3205.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1950–2010 · leading case: Lathon v. Cumberland Cnty., 646 S.E.2d 565 (N.C. Ct. App. 2007).
Lathon v. Cumberland Cnty., 646 S.E.2d 565 (N.C. Ct. App. 2007). “This principle has also been codified by our General Assembly in N.C. Gen.Stat. § 128-7 (2005) ("All officers shall continue in their respective offices until their successors are elected or appointed, and duly qualified.”
People Ex Rel. Duncan v. Beach, 242 S.E.2d 796 (N.C. 1978). “Plaintiff’s final argument for his entitlement to office is based on his reading of G.S. 128-7. This statute says, “All officers shall continue in their respective offices until their successors are elected or appointed, and duly qualified.”
Baxter v. Danny Nicholson, Inc., 690 S.E.2d 265 (N.C. 2010). “We find that the General Assembly answered this question when it enacted N.C.G.S. § 128-7, which provides: "All officers shall continue in their respective offices until their successors are elected or appointed, and duly qualified.”
Baxter v. Danny Nicholson, Inc., 661 S.E.2d 892 (N.C. Ct. App. 2008). “Under North Carolina General Statute section 128-7, “[a]ll officers shall continue in their respective offices until their successors are elected or appointed, and duly qualified.”
In Re Wingler, 58 S.E.2d 372 (N.C. 1950). “urt under Chapter 1142 of the 1949 Session Laws, a cogent argument might be advanced to sustain the proposition that he has remained a judge de jure since 7 June, 1949, under G.S. 128-7, which stipulates that “all officers shall continue in their respective offices until their…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.