NC General Statutes
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 163-28 (2026)
Repealed by 2024-57, s. 3A.2(e), effective July 1, 2025
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NCLEGncleg.gov (official)
JustiaChapter 163
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1957–2018 · leading case: Cooper v. Berger, 809 S.E.2d 98 (N.C. 2018).
Cooper v. Berger, 809 S.E.2d 98 (N.C. 2018). “Were the Governor given the degree of control he seeks over with the Board of Elections or Bipartisan Board in this case, neither Board could continue to function as "an independent regulatory and quasi-judicial agency" as the Board of Elections under prior law, N.”
Bazemore v. Bertie Cnty. Bd. of Elections, 119 S.E.2d 637 (N.C. 1961). “G.S. 163-28. *401 The decision in the instant case depends primarily upon the interpretation and construction of G.”
Lassiter v. Northampton Cnty. Bd. of Elections, 102 S.E.2d 853 (N.C. 1958). “At the outset she contends that the above provisions of G.S. 163-28 are unconstitutional by reason of conflict with the suffrage provisions of the Constitution of North Carolina.”
In Re Appeal of Ramseur, 463 S.E.2d 254 (N.C. Ct. App. 1995). “We note that the State Board of Elections is an independent state agency, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 163-28 (1991), and is therefore, subject to the Administrative Procedure Act, Chapter 150B.”
Lassiter v. Northampton Cnty. Bd. of Elections, 360 U.S. 45 (1959). “§§ 55:10-55:12; N. C. Gen. Stat. § 163-28; Okla. Stat. Ann.”
Lassiter v. Taylor, 152 F. Supp. 295 (E.D.N.C. 1957). “This is an action begun as a class action by a Negro woman resident in Northampton County, North Carolina, against the registrar of the voting precinct in which she resides, to have the Court declare unconstitutional and void the literacy test for voters prescribed by Section 4…”
Batdorff v. North Carolina State Bd. of Elections, 563 S.E.2d 43 (N.C. Ct. App. 2002). “]” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 163-28 (1999). The Board of Elections has the “duty and power” (7) To make investigations to the extent the Board deems necessary with respect to statements filed under the provisions of this Article and with respect to alleged failure to file any statement…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.