NC General Statutes
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 17-5 (2026)
By whom application is made
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NCLEGncleg.gov (official)
JustiaChapter 17
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Application for the writ may be made either by the party for whose relief it is intended or by any person in his behalf. (1868-9, c. 116, s. 3; Code, s. 1625; Rev., s. 1823; C.S., s. 2207.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1982–2021 · leading case: Pake v. Byrd, 286 S.E.2d 588 (N.C. Ct. App. 1982).
Pake v. Byrd, 286 S.E.2d 588 (N.C. Ct. App. 1982). “” Williston, supra, § 17-5 at 12. Whether the parties to the transaction have created an express warranty is a question of fact.”
Warzynski v. Empire Comfort Sys., Inc., 401 S.E.2d 801 (N.C. Ct. App. 1991). “Fonseca, Williston on Sales § 17-5 (4th ed. 1974). Accordingly, we hold that the language in Empire’s advertisement is merely puffing and not an express warranty.”
Hall v. T. L. Kemp Jewelry, Inc., 322 S.E.2d 7 (N.C. Ct. App. 1984). “5 Williston on Sales § 17-5 (4th ed. 1974). The law recognizes that some sellers’ statements are only sales palaver and not express warranties.”
Coastal Leasing Corp. v. O'NEAL, 405 S.E.2d 208 (N.C. Ct. App. 1991). “Coastal Refrigeration’s third argument asserting the lessor’s disclaimer of all warranties in the lease is immaterial.”
Chavez v. McFadden (N.C. 2020). “§ 17-6, must allege, among other things, that the party “is imprisoned or restrained of his liberty,” the location of the party’s imprisonment, the person restraining the imprisoned party, “[t]he cause or pretense of such imprisonment or restraint,” and any supporting documents.…”
Chavez v. McFadden (N.C. 2020). “§ 17-6, must allege, among other things, that the party “is imprisoned or restrained of his liberty,” the location of the party’s imprisonment, the person restraining the imprisoned party, “[t]he cause or pretense of such imprisonment or restraint,” and any supporting documents.…”
State v. Daw (N.C. Ct. App. 2021). “§ 17-5, and may be directed to any superior or appellate court judge, id.”
State v. Daw (N.C. Ct. App. 2021). “§ 17-5, and may be directed to any superior or appellate court judge, id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.