NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 25-2-101 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 25 CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This article shall be known and may be cited as Uniform Commercial Code-Sales. (1965, c. 700, s. 1.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 10 cases, 1972–2016 · leading case: Coastal Leasing Corp. v. O'NEAL, 405 S.E.2d 208 (N.C. Ct. App. 1991).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Coastal Leasing Corp. v. O'NEAL, 405 S.E.2d 208 (N.C. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 9× “, to this arrangement, which provided for the leasing company to obtain title from Coastal Refrigeration only after O’Neal had personally selected the equipment from the seller and then authorized its purchase by the leasing company. O’Neal seeks recovery of expenses incurred as…”

Fordham v. Eason, 521 S.E.2d 701 (N.C. 1999). · cites it 3× “N.C.G.S. §§ 25-2-101, 25-2-107 (1995). The Uniform Commercial Code defines timber as follows: A contract for the sale .”

Sunamerica Fin. Corp. v. Bonham, 400 S.E.2d 435 (N.C. 1991). · cites it 2× “Since the Contract involved the sale of goods, the North Carolina Uniform Commercial Code, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 25-2-101 et seq., applies to the Contract and all transactions associated with it.”

Halprin v. Ford Motor Co., 420 S.E.2d 686 (N.C. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 3× “” Plaintiff prayed damages in the amount of the difference between the truck’s purchase price and its actual value at the time of sale, plus consequential damages and treble damages under *425 N.”

D.G. II, LLC v. Nix, 713 S.E.2d 140 (N.C. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “See generally N.C. Gen. Stat. § 25-2-101 (2009) et seq.”

Clean Burn Fuels, LLC v. Purdue BioEnergy, LLC (In re Clean Burn Fuels, LLC), 492 B.R. 445 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2013). · cites it 2× “N.C. Gen.Stat. §§ 25-2-101, 25-2-102. The U.”

United States v. 328 Pounds, More or Less, of Wild Am. Ginseng, 347 F. Supp. 2d 241 (W.D.N.C. 2004). · cites it 2× “Article II defines goods as “all things (including specially manufactured goods) which are movable at the time of identification to the contract for sale other than the money in which the price is to be paid, investment securities .”

Muther-Ballenger v. Griffin Elec. Consultants, Inc., 397 S.E.2d 247 (N.C. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “The sale of the scanner is a sale of goods and, thus, the sales transaction is governed by the Uniform Commercial Code, N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 25-2-101 et seq. Plaintiffs first claim is that defendant made and breached an express warranty that the scanner would completely perform…”

Gillispie Ex Rel. Troxler v. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 187 S.E.2d 441 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972). “*4 Before adoption of the Uniform Commercial Code (G.S. 25-2-101 et seq,, effective 1 July 1967), the law in this jurisdiction was that in an implied warranty of fitness did not extend to a container in which a product came from the producer.”

Kornegay Fam. Farms, LLC v. Cross Creek Seed, Inc., 2016 NCBC 30 (N.C. Bus. Ct. 2016). · cites it 2× “Laws 768 , 775–811 (codified as amended at N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 25-2-101 to -725 (2015)).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.