NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 39-23.12 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 39 CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This Article, which was formerly cited as the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, may be cited as the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act. (1997-291, s. 2; 2015-23, s. 1.)

Article 4.

Voluntary Organizations and Associations.

§§ 39-24, 39-25: Repealed by Session Laws 2006-226, s. 2(a), effective January 1, 2007.

§ 39-26: Recodified as G.S. 59B-15(a) by Session Laws 2006-226, s. 2(b), effective January 1, 2007.

§ 39-27: Recodified as G.S. 59B-15(b) by Session Laws 2006-226, s. 2(b), effective January 1, 2007.

Article 5.

Sale of Building Lots in North Carolina.

§§ 39-28 through 39-32: Repealed by Session Laws 1981, c. 358.

Article 5A.

Control Corners in Real Estate Developments.

§§ 39-32.1 through 39-32.4: Repealed by Session Laws 2017-27, s. 2, effective July 1, 2017.

Article 6.

Power of Appointment.

§§ 39-33, 39-34: Repealed by Sessions Laws 2017-102, s. 13(a), effective July 12, 2017.

§ 39-35: Recodified as G.S. 31D-5-505 by Session Laws 2017-102, s. 13(b), effective July 12, 2017.

§ 39-36: Recodified as G.S. 31D-4-403.1 by Sessions Laws 2017-102, s. 13(c), effective July 12, 2017.

Article 7.

Uniform Vendor and Purchaser Risk Act.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2015–2017 · leading case: Hoch v. Hoch (In re Hoch), 577 B.R. 202 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 2017).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Hoch v. Hoch (In re Hoch), 577 B.R. 202 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 2017). · cites it 2× “See also N.C. Gen. Stat. § 39-23.12 (“This Article, which was- formerly cited as the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, may be cited as the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act.”

Finley Grp. v. Working Media Grp. Atlanta, LLC (In re Redf Mktg., LLC), 536 B.R. 646 (Bankr. W.D.N.C. 2015). · cites it 3× “41 (“This act shall be applied and construed to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law of fraudulent conveyance among the states enacting it”), with N.C.G.S. § 39-23.12 (“This Article may be cited as the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act”), and N.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.