NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 62-74 (2026)

Complaints by public utilities

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 62 CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any public utility shall have the right to file a complaint against any other public utility or any person on any of the grounds upon which complaints are allowed to be filed by other parties, and the same procedure shall be adopted and followed as in other cases, except that the complaint and notice of hearing shall be served by the Commission upon such interested persons as it may designate. (1949, c. 989, s. 1; 1963, c. 1165, s. 1; 2021-23, s. 8.)

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1956–1976 · leading case: Duke Power Co. v. Blue Ridge Elec. Membership Corp., 117 S.E.2d 812 (N.C. 1961).
Duke Power Co. v. Blue Ridge Elec. Membership Corp., 117 S.E.2d 812 (N.C. 1961). · cites it 3× “§ 62-73, and to furnish service to any not served, G.S. § 62-74. A utility cannot begin operation unless and until it has obtained a certificate of public convenience and necessity from the Utilities Commission.”
State Ex Rel. Utils. Comm'n v. S. Ry. Co., 118 S.E.2d 21 (N.C. 1961). “62-48 and G.S. 62-74. A 1933 Statute, Public Laws of 1933, c.”
State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Edmisten, 227 S.E.2d 593 (N.C. Ct. App. 1976). “62-73, G.S. 62-74, G.S. 62-134 (e), or G.S. 62-3(24) investigation and ordered change must be made under the umbrella of the authority given by G.”
State Ex Rel. Utils. Comm'n v. City of Greensboro, 93 S.E.2d 151 (N.C. 1956). “Moreover, in our opinion, the protest filed by the City of Greensboro in this proceeding was not sufficient to constitute such notice as is required by G.S. 62-74 in order to authorize the Commission to consider whether or not the service rendered by the petitioner was adequate…”
State Ex Rel. Utils. Com'n v. Edmisten, 227 S.E.2d 593 (N.C. Ct. App. 1976). “62-73, G.S. 62-74, G.S. *601 62-134(e), or G.S. 62-3(24) investigation and ordered change must be made under the umbrella of the authority given by G.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.