NC General Statutes
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-260 (2026)
Review of transfer matters
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NCLEGncleg.gov (official)
JustiaChapter 7A
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Orders transferring or refusing to transfer are not immediately appealable, even for abuse of discretion. Such orders are reviewable only by the appellate division on appeal from a final judgment. If on review, such an order is found erroneous, reversal or remand is not granted unless prejudice is shown. If, on review, a new trial or partial new trial is ordered for other reasons, the appellate division may specify the proper division for new trial and order a transfer thereto. (1965, c. 310, s. 1; 1967, c. 108, s. 7.)
§ 7A-261. Repealed by Session Laws 1971, c. 377, s. 32.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1971–2008 · leading case: Kitchin Ex Rel. Kitchin v. Halifax Cnty., 665 S.E.2d 760 (N.C. Ct. App. 2008).
Kitchin Ex Rel. Kitchin v. Halifax Cnty., 665 S.E.2d 760 (N.C. Ct. App. 2008). “N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-260 (2007). “If on review, such an order is found erroneous, reversal or remand is not granted unless prejudice is shown.”
Stanback v. Stanback, 215 S.E.2d 30 (N.C. 1975). “G.S. 7A-260 (1969). Plaintiff’s motion to transfer this action to district court was made pursuant to G.”
Bryant v. Kelly, 181 S.E.2d 438 (N.C. 1971). “” G.S. 7A-260. In our view, the superior court is the proper division for the trial of this case.”
Flynn v. Flynn, 485 S.E.2d 866 (N.C. Ct. App. 1997). “N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-260 (1995) provides: Orders transferring or refusing to transfer are not immediately appealable, even for abuse of discretion.”
Hopper v. Morgan, 182 S.E.2d 228 (N.C. Ct. App. 1971). “G.S. 7A-260 provides for review of a failure to transfer a cause.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.