NC General Statutes
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-30 (2026)
Appeals of right from certain decisions of the Court of Appeals
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NCLEGncleg.gov (official)
JustiaChapter 7A
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Except as provided in G.S. 7A-28, an appeal lies of right to the Supreme Court from any decision of the Court of Appeals rendered in a case:
(1) Which directly involves a substantial question arising under the Constitution of the United States or of this State.
(2) Repealed by Session Laws 2023-134, s. 16.21(d), effective July 1, 2023. (1967, c. 108, s. 1; 1983, c. 526, s. 2; 2016-125, 4th Ex. Sess., s. 22(c); 2023-134, s. 16.21(d).)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1,848
cases (290 in the last 5 years), 1968–2026 · leading case: State v. Grady, 831 S.E.2d 542 (N.C. 2019).
State v. Grady, 831 S.E.2d 542 (N.C. 2019). “TORREY GRADY Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 817 S.”
State v. Rankin, 821 S.E.2d 787 (N.C. 2018). “ANGELA MARIE RANKIN Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.”
State v. Todd, 369 N.C. 707 (N.C. 2017). “In this appeal we consider whether this Court has jurisdiction to decide an appeal taken from a divided decision of the Court of Appeals pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) arising from a trial court’s ruling granting or denying a motion for appropriate relief (MAR) and whether the…”
Medlin v. Bass, 398 S.E.2d 460 (N.C. 1990). “N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) (1989). Because this appeal is before us pursuant to N.”
State v. Styles, 665 S.E.2d 438 (N.C. 2008). “See N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) (2007). The Fourth Amendment protects individuals "against unreasonable searches and seizures," U.”
Wray v. City of Greensboro, 802 S.E.2d 894 (N.C. 2017). “CITY OF GREENSBORO Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.”
Steingress v. Steingress, 511 S.E.2d 298 (N.C. 1999). “" Thus, it appears the dissenting opinion in this case presents no dividing issue and is merely a vote in favor of the exercise of discretion to suspend the rules.”
Marcus Bros. Textiles, Inc. v. Price Waterhouse, LLP, 513 S.E.2d 320 (N.C. 1999). “Based on this dissent, Price Waterhouse filed a timely notice of appeal as of right to this Court pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2). At the outset, we note that although a company's "financial statements themselves are the representations of management, not the auditor," "an audit…”
State v. Benters, 766 S.E.2d 593 (N.C. 2014). “GLENN EDWARD BENTERS Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.”
Morrell v. Hardin Creek, Inc., 821 S.E.2d 360 (N.C. 2018). “Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.”
Meiselman v. Meiselman, 307 S.E.2d 551 (N.C. 1983). “G.S. § 7A-30(2). II. We note at the outset that the enterprises with which we are dealing are close corporations, not publicly held corporations.”
Applewood Props., LLC v. New South Props., LLC, 742 S.E.2d 776 (N.C. 2013). “; and URBAN DESIGN PARTNERS Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.”
— N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-30(1) — 49 cases
Peace v. Emp. SEC. Com'n of North Carolina, 507 S.E.2d 272 (N.C. 1998).
Cooper v. Berger, 822 S.E.2d 286 (N.C. 2018).
Tom Togs, Inc. v. Ben Elias Indus. Corp., 348 S.E.2d 782 (N.C. 1986).
Leete v. Cnty. of Warren, 462 S.E.2d 476 (N.C. 1995).
State v. Thompson, 508 S.E.2d 277 (N.C. 1998).
— N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-30(2) — 591 cases
State v. Grady, 831 S.E.2d 542 (N.C. 2019). “TORREY GRADY Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 817 S.”
State v. Rankin, 821 S.E.2d 787 (N.C. 2018). “ANGELA MARIE RANKIN Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.”
State v. Todd, 369 N.C. 707 (N.C. 2017). “In this appeal we consider whether this Court has jurisdiction to decide an appeal taken from a divided decision of the Court of Appeals pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) arising from a trial court’s ruling granting or denying a motion for appropriate relief (MAR) and whether the…”
Medlin v. Bass, 398 S.E.2d 460 (N.C. 1990). “N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) (1989). Because this appeal is before us pursuant to N.”
State v. Styles, 665 S.E.2d 438 (N.C. 2008). “See N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) (2007). The Fourth Amendment protects individuals "against unreasonable searches and seizures," U.”
— N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-30(3) — 5 cases
State Ex Rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Duke Power Co., 287 S.E.2d 786 (N.C. 1982).
Hendrix v. Alsop, 180 S.E.2d 802 (N.C. 1971).
State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. City of Durham, 190 S.E.2d 851 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).
State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Virginia Elec. & Power Co., 203 S.E.2d 418 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974).
State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Beatties Ford Utils., Inc., 203 S.E.2d 649 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974).
— N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-30(B)(2)(C)(1) — 1 case
State v. Byrd, 628 S.E.2d 386 (N.C. 2006).
— N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-30(b) — 1 case
State v. Harless, 584 S.E.2d 339 (N.C. Ct. App. 2003).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.