Any person who may be denied employment or be deprived of continuation of his employment in violation of G.S. 95-80, 95-81 and 95-82 or of one or more of such sections, shall be entitled to recover from such employer and from any other person, firm, corporation, or association acting in concert with him by appropriate action in the courts of this State such damages as he may have sustained by reason of such denial or deprivation of employment. (1947, c. 328, s. 6.)
§ 95-84. Application of Article.
The provisions of this Article shall not apply to any lawful contract in force on the effective date hereof but they shall apply in all respects to contracts entered into thereafter and to any renewal or extension of any existing contract. (1947, c. 328, s. 7.)
Article 11.
Minimum Wage Act.
§§ 95-85 through 95-96: Repealed by Session Laws 1979, c. 839, s. 2.
Article 12.
Units of Government and Labor Unions, Trade Unions, and Labor Organizations, and Public Employee Strikes.
§ 95-97: Repealed by Session Laws 1998-217, s. 26.
Notes of Decisions
Coman v. Thomas Mfg. Co., 381 S.E.2d 445 (N.C. 1989).
· cites it 6× “1 (1985); engaging in labor disputes, N.C.G.S. § 95-83 (1985); filing Occupational Safety and Health Act claims, N.”
Harris v. Duke Power Co., 356 S.E.2d 357 (N.C. 1987).
· cites it 6× “1 (1985); engaging in labor union activities, N.C.G.S. § 95-83 (1985); instituting an Occupational Safety and Health Act proceeding, N.”
Boesche v. Raleigh-Durham Airport Auth., 432 S.E.2d 137 (N.C. Ct. App. 1993).
· cites it 2× “, prohibiting discharge in retaliation for filing a workers’ compensation claim, North Carolina General Statutes § 97-6.1 (1983); prohibiting discharge for engaging in labor disputes, North Carolina General Statutes § 95-83 (1985); and prohibiting discharge for filing…”
Ulysses Vernon Beasley v. Food Fair of N. C., Inc., 190 S.E.2d 333 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).
· cites it 2× “” G.S. 95-83 provides: “Any person who may be denied employment or be deprived of continuation of his employment in violation of §§ 95-80, 95-81 and 95-82 or of one or more of such sections, shall be entitled to recover from such employer and from any other person, firm,…”
Willard v. Huffman, 101 S.E.2d 373 (N.C. 1958).
“95-80, 95-81 and 95-82 or of one or more of such sections, shall be entitled to recover from such employer and from any other person, firm, corporation, or association acting in concert with *526 him by appropriate action in the courts of this State such damages as he may have…”
Beasley v. Food Fair of N. C., Inc., 193 S.E.2d 911 (N.C. 1973).
“” Plaintiffs’ action for damages is based on G.S. 95-83, which provides: “Any person who may be denied employment or be deprived of continuation of his employment in violation of §§ 95-80, 95-81, and 95-82 or of one or more of such sections, shall be entitled to recover from…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.