North Dakota Century Code
N.D. Cent. Code § 32-23-07 (2026)
Review of declaratory judgment
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ND-LEGndlegis.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
All orders, judgments, and decrees under this chapter may be reviewed as other orders, judgments, and decrees.
\nNotes of Decisions
Cited in 22
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1981–2024 · leading case: Ziegler v. Meadowbrook Ins. Grp., Inc., 2009 ND 192 (N.D. 2009).
Ziegler v. Meadowbrook Ins. Grp., Inc., 2009 ND 192 (N.D. 2009). “Rather, N.D.C.C. § 32-23-07 explicitly provides that "[a]ll orders, judgments, and *786 decrees under [N.”
Nationwide Mut. Ins. Companies v. Lagodinski, 2004 ND 147 (N.D. 2004). “N.D.C.C. § 32-23-07; see also Hanneman v.”
Hanneman v. Cont'l W. Ins. Co., 1998 ND 46 (N.D. 1998). “" Applying this interpretation to the aforementioned finding, the district court ultimately concluded the Continental policy did not provide coverage because Kurry was a "designated driver" and as such, "possession and control of the vehicle" remained with Dawn Hanneman. [¶ 18]…”
Amerada Hess Corp. v. Conrad, 410 N.W.2d 124 (N.D. 1987). “NDCC § 32-23-07; American Hardware Mutual Ins.”
W. Nat'l Mut. Ins. Co. v. Univ. of North Dakota, 2002 ND 63 (N.D. 2002). “VI, §§ 2 and 6, and N.D.C.C. §§ 32-23-07 and 28-27-01. II [¶ 6] Western National argues its insurance policy with UND clearly and unambiguously excluded coverage for loss or damage caused “directly or indirectly” by flood “regardless of any other cause or event that contributes…”
Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas Ass'n v. Conrad, 405 N.W.2d 279 (N.D. 1987). “*281 The issues framed by the taxpayers are: (1) Whether the North Dakota State Tax Commissioner has the statutory authority to assess sales or use taxes upon the "plant fuel" used by the taxpayers in their gas processing facilities? (2) Whether the assessment of sales or use…”
Denault v. State, 2017 ND 167 (N.D. 2017). “The court further held the attorney general’s office acted in excess of its statutory authority and in violation of the North Dakota Constitution’s separation of powers in deciding there was an equivalent North Dakota offense and by imposing a duty to register as a sexual…”
Kuntz v. State, 2019 ND 46 (N.D. 2019). “C.C. ch. 32-23 when the court failed to address his requested relief in its order.”
Somerset Court v. Burgum, 2021 ND 58 (N.D. 2021). “2d 841 ; see also N.D.C.C. § 32-23-07 (“All orders, judgments, and decrees under this chapter may be reviewed as other orders, judgments, and decrees.”
Zerr v. North Dakota Workforce Saf. & Ins., 2017 ND 175 (N.D. 2017). “He contends the district court had subject matter jurisdiction either because he exhausted his administrative remedies or WSI foreclosed him from doing so.”
Olympic Fin. Grp. v. ND Dep't of Fin. Institutions, 2023 ND 38 (N.D. 2023). “In its order, the court held that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over both plaintiffs’ claims in the amended complaint based on the failure to exhaust administrative remedies before seeking relief in the district court.”
Ramsey Cnty. Farm Bureau v. Ramsey Cnty., 2008 ND 175 (N.D. 2008). “The court concluded Amendment # 1 was stricken in its entirety when Amendment # 2 was enacted; Ramsey County substantially complied with the statutory publication requirements and the plaintiffs were not prejudiced by the publication delay; Ramsey County did not exceed its…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.