1. A period of revocation is at least thirty days and not more than one year, unless otherwise provided by law.
2. The director shall revoke for a period of one year or for a period as may be recommended by the trial court, the operator's license of an individual upon receiving a record of the individual's conviction of any of the following offenses:
a. A felony in which a motor vehicle was used in the commission of the felony.
b. A misdemeanor resulting from the operation of a motor vehicle and causing serious bodily injury, as defined in section 12.1-01-04, to another individual.
c. The making of a false affidavit or statement under oath to the director under this chapter or under any other law relating to the ownership or operation of motor vehicles.
3. The revocation of the license under this section may be beyond any time of imprisonment or court-ordered addiction treatment.
Notes of Decisions
Kosmatka v. Saf. Responsibility Div. of the North Dakota State High. Dep't, 196 N.W.2d 402 (N.D. 1972).
· cites it 6× “His license was subsequently revoked by the Safety Responsibility Division pursuant to § 39-06-31, N.D.C.C. Thereafter Kosmatka brought an action in the District Court of Grand Forks County for a show cause hearing to determine whether the revocation of his license should be…”
City of Fargo v. Bommersbach, 511 N.W.2d 563 (N.D. 1994).
· cites it 2× “If the suspension or revocation was imposed for violation of section 39-08-01 or equivalent ordinance or was governed by section 39-06-31 or chapter 39-20, the sentence must be at least four consecutive days’ imprisonment and such fine as the court deems proper.”
State v. Carmody, 253 N.W.2d 415 (N.D. 1977).
· cites it 2× “In addition, under § 39-06-31(1), NDCC, a conviction under either charge results in the revocation of a driver's license.”
State v. Sinner, 207 N.W.2d 495 (N.D. 1973).
· cites it 2× “Burson, supra , and that our statute providing for mandatory revocation upon such conviction, § 39-06-31(6), N.D.C.C., did not deny constitutional due process even though a pre-suspension hearing was not provided.”
State v. Medearis, 165 N.W.2d 688 (N.D. 1969).
· cites it 2× “Section 39-06-31, N.D.C.C., requires a mandatory revocation of a driver’s license upon final conviction of the offense of driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.”
Keller v. Paris, 207 N.W.2d 239 (N.D. 1973).
· cites it 3× “, but he may not modify a revocation arising out of Sections 39-06-31 and 39-06-43, N.D.C.C. For the reasons stated in this opinion, the order of the district court dismissing the appeal from the commissioner’s order is hereby affirmed and the case is remanded with instructions…”
— N.D. Cent. Code § 39-06-31(1) — 1 case
State v. Carmody, 253 N.W.2d 415 (N.D. 1977).
“In addition, under § 39-06-31(1), NDCC, a conviction under either charge results in the revocation of a driver's license.”
— N.D. Cent. Code § 39-06-31(6) — 2 cases
State v. Sinner, 207 N.W.2d 495 (N.D. 1973).
“Burson, supra , and that our statute providing for mandatory revocation upon such conviction, § 39-06-31(6), N.D.C.C., did not deny constitutional due process even though a pre-suspension hearing was not provided.”
Keller v. Paris, 207 N.W.2d 239 (N.D. 1973).
“, but he may not modify a revocation arising out of Sections 39-06-31 and 39-06-43, N.D.C.C. For the reasons stated in this opinion, the order of the district court dismissing the appeal from the commissioner’s order is hereby affirmed and the case is remanded with instructions…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.