State v. Pointer (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). · Go Syfert
State v. Pointer (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State
v.
Pointer
85195.
Ohio Court of Appeals.
Jun 3, 2014.
Blackmon.
Published

[Cite as State v. Pointer, 2014-Ohio-2383.]

Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 85195

STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.

DENNIS POINTER DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

JUDGMENT: APPLICATION DENIED

Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR-294529 Application for Reopening Motion No. 473259

RELEASED DATE: June 3, 2014

-i-

FOR APPELLANT

Dennis W. Pointer, pro se Inmate No. 0169-139 P.O. Box 5600 Cleveland, Ohio 44101

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE

Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: Diane Smilanick Assistant County Prosecutor 8th Floor Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113

PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, P.J.:

{¶1} Dennis Pointer has filed an application for reopening pursuant to App.R.

26(B). Pointer is attempting to reopen the appellate judgment, journalized in State v. Pointer, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 85195, 2005-Ohio-3587, which affirmed the denial of a motion to withdraw a plea of guilty filed in State v. Pointer, Cuyahoga C.P. No.

CR-351032. We decline to reopen Pointer’s appeal.

{¶2} The appeal, which formed the basis of Pointer’s application for reopening, concerned a postconviction motion. Specifically, Pointer’s appeal involved an appeal

from the denial of his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. An application for reopening, brought pursuant to App.R. 26(B) can only be employed to reopen an appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence, based upon a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. See State v. Loomer, 76 Ohio St.3d 398, 667 N.E.2d 1209 (1996). See also

State v. Bronczyk, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 98664, 2013-Ohio-3129; State v. Nicholson, 8th

Dist. Cuyahoga No. 97873, 2013-Ohio-1786; and State v. Townsend, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga

No. 97544, 2013-Ohio-1653. Because App.R. 26(B) applies only to the direct appeal of a criminal conviction and sentence, it cannot now be employed to reopen the appeal that dealt with a denial of a postconviction motion to withdraw a plea of guilty.

{¶3} Accordingly, the application for reopening is denied.

PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, PRESIDING JUDGE

EILEEN T. GALLAGHER, J., and TIM McCORMACK, J., CONCUR