Embshoff v. Embshoff, 12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 236 (Oh. Circ. Ct., Hamilton 1909). · Go Syfert
Search
Embshoff v. Embshoff, 12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 236 (Oh. Circ. Ct., Hamilton 1909). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
George H. Embshoff
v.
Lillie Embshoff
Hamilton Circuit Court.
Jun 5, 1909.
12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 236
Eugene C. Pociey, for plaintiff in error., Chas. H. Jones, for the wife.
Giffen, Smith, Swing.
Published

While the case of Guenther v. Jacobs, 44 Wis., 354, sustains the contention of counsel that the demurrer to the petition should have been sustained, yet the decisions in this state lead to a different conclusion.

Alimony decreed in installments may be enforced by execution. Piatt v. Piatt, 9 Ohio, 37.

[*238] The adequacy of alimony decreed can not be collaterally drawn in question especially by a stranger to the suit. Hare v. Gibson, 32 O. S., 33.

The 'husband is not complaining, and the installments due are in legal effect a judgment, the collection of which may be' enforced by an action upon"the appeal bond, without first obtaining the consent of the court rendering the decree.

Judgment affirmed.

Same judgment in case No. 4715.