(A) At least thirty days before filing a petition pursuant to section 163.05 of the Revised Code, an agency shall provide notice to the owner of the agency's intent to acquire the property. The notice shall be substantially in the form set forth in section 163.041 of the Revised Code. The notice shall be delivered personally on, or by certified mail to, the owner of the property or the owner's designated representative.
(B) Together with the notice that division (A) of this section requires, or after providing that notice but not less than thirty days before filing a petition pursuant to section 163.05 of the Revised Code, an agency shall provide an owner with a written good faith offer to purchase the property. The agency may revise that offer if before commencing an appropriation proceeding the agency becomes aware of conditions indigenous to the property that could not reasonably have been discovered at the time of the initial good faith offer or if the agency and the owner exchange appraisals prior to the filing of the petition.
(C) An agency may appropriate real property only after the agency obtains an appraisal of the property and provides a copy of the appraisal to the owner or, if more than one, each owner or to the guardian or trustee of each owner. The agency need not provide an owner with a copy of the appraisal when that owner is incapable of contracting in person or by agent to convey the property and has no guardian or trustee or is unknown, or the residence of the owner cannot with reasonable diligence be ascertained. When the appraisal indicates that the property is worth less than ten thousand dollars, the agency need only provide an owner, guardian, or trustee with a summary of the appraisal. The agency shall provide the copy or summary of the appraisal to an owner, guardian, or trustee at or before the time the agency makes its first offer to purchase the property. A public utility or the head of a public agency may prescribe a procedure to waive the appraisal in cases involving the acquisition by sale or donation of property with a fair market value of ten thousand dollars or less.
(D) An agency may appropriate real property only after the agency is unable to agree on a conveyance or the terms of a conveyance, for any reason, with any owner or the guardian or trustee of any owner unless each owner is incapable of contracting in person or by agent to convey the property and has no guardian or trustee, each owner is unknown, or the residence of each owner is unknown to the agency and the residence of no owner can with reasonable diligence be ascertained.
(E) An agency may appropriate real property for projects that will disrupt the flow of traffic or impede access to property only after the agency makes reasonable efforts to plan the project in a way that will limit those effects. This division does not apply to an agency if it initiated the project for which it appropriates the property under Title LV of the Revised Code.
Cleveland Bakers Union Local No. 19 Pension Fund v. State, 443 N.E.2d 999 (Ohio Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 7דR.C. 163.04. If a petition for appropriation is filed, it must contain “[a] description of each parcel of land or interest or right therein sought to be appropriated * * R.”
Weir v. Kebe, 503 N.E.2d 177 (Ohio Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 5ד3 C In part C of Assignment of Error I, appellants argue that the state violated R.C. 163.04 governing appropriation of property and R.”
Mill Creek Metro. Dist. Bd. of Commrs. v. Less, 2022 Ohio 1289 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 5ד11; and 2) that the common pleas court erred in overruling her motion for summary judgment because the complaint and the process leading up to the filing of the complaint did not follow the mandatory requirements set forth in R.C. 163.04, 163.041 and 163.05. 3 {¶2} Because we…”
Maumee Watershed Conservancy Dist. v. Buescher, 2017 Ohio 9086 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 34דAnd, per its appraisals, the District made a “good faith offer,” pursuant to R.C. 163.04, to purchase the Bueschers land for $146,234.”
City of Toledo v. Beazer Materials & Servs., Inc., 923 F. Supp. 1013 (N.D. Ohio 1996). · cites it 7ד” O.R.C. 163.04 and 163.05 provide how an agency (here the City) “lawfully exercise[s] its power of eminent domain.”
Dublin v. Beatley, 2016 Ohio 5606 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 10ד12(B)(1) motion to dismiss, claiming appellee failed to comply with the notice requirements of R.C. 163.04 and 163.041. Appellee filed a memorandum in opposition on November 4, 2015.”
Putnam Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Weis, 2019 Ohio 3720 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 16ד1 The trial court erred by refusing to dismiss the commissioners’ applications for appropriation for failure to meet the requirements of R.C. 163.04 and R.C. 163.041. Assignment of Error No.”
City of Wadsworth v. Yannerilla, 866 N.E.2d 1113 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 3דGood Faith Negotiations {¶ 18} R.C. 163.04 mandates that an appropriation may be made only after the agency is unable to agree with the owner, or if more than one, any owner, of the property in question.”
Hurst v. Starr, 607 N.E.2d 1155 (Ohio Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 2דOn December 5, 1990, ODOT filed a complaint pursuant to R.C. 163.04 to permanently appropriate a twenty-two-foot-wide strip of appellees’ front yard, which equaled ten percent of appellees’ residential property, for purposes of widening Broad Street from two to five lanes.”
Putnam Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Weis, 2019 Ohio 3720 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “1 The trial court erred by refusing to dismiss the commissioners’ applications for appropriation for failure to meet the requirements of R.C. 163.04 and R.C. 163.041. Assignment of Error No.”
Dublin v. Beatley, 2016 Ohio 5606 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “12(B)(1) motion to dismiss, claiming appellee failed to comply with the notice requirements of R.C. 163.04 and 163.041. Appellee filed a memorandum in opposition on November 4, 2015.”
Maumee Watershed Conservancy Dist. v. Buescher, 2017 Ohio 9086 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “And, per its appraisals, the District made a “good faith offer,” pursuant to R.C. 163.04, to purchase the Bueschers land for $146,234.”
Putnam Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Weis, 2019 Ohio 3720 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “1 The trial court erred by refusing to dismiss the commissioners’ applications for appropriation for failure to meet the requirements of R.C. 163.04 and R.C. 163.041. Assignment of Error No.”
Maumee Watershed Conservancy Dist. v. Buescher, 2017 Ohio 9086 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “And, per its appraisals, the District made a “good faith offer,” pursuant to R.C. 163.04, to purchase the Bueschers land for $146,234.”
Maumee Watershed Conservancy Dist. v. Buescher, 2017 Ohio 9086 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “And, per its appraisals, the District made a “good faith offer,” pursuant to R.C. 163.04, to purchase the Bueschers land for $146,234.”
Maumee Watershed Conservancy Dist. v. Buescher, 2017 Ohio 9086 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “And, per its appraisals, the District made a “good faith offer,” pursuant to R.C. 163.04, to purchase the Bueschers land for $146,234.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.