Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 163
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 163.19 (2026)

Appeal

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
October 10, 2007
Latest Legislation:
Senate Bill 7 - 127th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

Subject to sections 163.07 and 163.09 of the Revised Code, any party may prosecute appeals as in other civil actions from the judgment of the court.

The owner may request, and the court may grant, a stay on appeal, provided that the owner posts a supersedeas bond in an amount the court determines.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1990–2022 · leading case: City of Norwood v. Horney, 853 N.E.2d 1115 (Ohio 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Norwood v. Horney, 853 N.E.2d 1115 (Ohio 2006). · cites it 24× “2005-0227 and 2005-0228, we determine the constitutionality of the provision in R.C. 163.19 prohibiting a court from enjoining the taking and using of property appropriated by the government and transferred to a private party for redevelopment, after the compensation for the…”
State ex rel. Bohlen v. Halliday (Slip Opinion), 2021 Ohio 194 (Ohio 2021). · cites it 12× “09(B)(2) does not divest the trial court of jurisdiction to proceed with the compensation trial, Ohio Power points to R.C. 163.19, which states: Subject to sections 163.”
State ex rel. Horwitz v. Court of Common Pleas, 603 N.E.2d 1005 (Ohio 1992). · cites it 9× “They do not cite any statute in support, but we assume they are referring to R.C. 163.19, which states: “Subject to sections 163.”
Schlegel v. Sweeney, 2022 Ohio 3841 (Ohio 2022). “{¶ 10} In addition to the right to an immediate appeal following a hearing on the agency’s right to make the appropriation, a property owner in an appropriation case may appeal from the final judgment following a compensation trial “as in other civil actions from the judgment of…”
State ex rel. Suburban Constr. Co. v. Skok, 710 N.E.2d 710 (Ohio 1999). · cites it 2× “Under R.C. 163.19, the trial court can require that Mentor “give adequate security for any further compensation and costs” pending appeal in order to cover any damages from a temporary loss of possession of the property pending appeal.”
State ex rel. Suburban Constr. Co. v. Skok, 1999 Ohio 329 (Ohio 1999). · cites it 2× “Under R.C. 163.19, the trial court can require that Mentor “give adequate security for any further compensation and costs” pending appeal in order to cover any damages from a temporary loss of possession of the property pending appeal.”
Bd. of Trs. of Sinclair Cmty. Coll. Dist. v. Farra, 929 N.E.2d 1105 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “In Norwood, the Ohio Supreme Court considered two issues: {¶ 15} “[T]he constitutionality of a municipality’s taking of an individual’s property by eminent domain and transferring the property to a private entity for redevelopment * * * [and] the constitutionality of the…”
Queensgate Terminals, L.L.C. v. Cincinnati, 2013 Ohio 4219 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). “{¶12} From that point on, R.C. 163.19 provides that appealing parties must follow the general rule: “any party may prosecute appeals as in other civil actions from the judgment of the court.”
Vukovich v. Youngstown, 7 Ohio App. Unrep. 251 (Ohio Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 8× “Section 163.19 of the Codified Ordinance of Youngstown, Ohio governs vacation benefits of the city of Youngstown.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 163.19(a) — 1 case
Vukovich v. Youngstown, 7 Ohio App. Unrep. 251 (Ohio Ct. App. 1990). “Section 163.19 of the Codified Ordinance of Youngstown, Ohio governs vacation benefits of the city of Youngstown.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 163.19(b) — 1 case
Vukovich v. Youngstown, 7 Ohio App. Unrep. 251 (Ohio Ct. App. 1990). “Section 163.19 of the Codified Ordinance of Youngstown, Ohio governs vacation benefits of the city of Youngstown.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.